Preview

Mental Rotation of Images

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mental Rotation of Images
Abstract

The idea of mental imagery has always been a controversial subject in the field of psychology. Many psychologists have argued that such a concept is impossible to measure because it can not be directly observed. Though they are right about this, it is not impossible to measure how quickly mental rotations of images are processed in our brains. Subjects in this experiment were presented two shapes simultaneously, via computer screen, and asked to make judgement, as quickly as possible, as to whether the two shapes presented were the same or mirror images. Two different shapes were used in this experiment, each given as often as the other. During each trial one shape remained stationary and the other was rotated with varying amounts of 0, 60, 120, and 180 degrees. As the angle of rotation increased reaction times were calculated to see if this had any baring on the speed of the reaction. As predicted, reaction times increased along with angular disparity.

Rotation of Mental Images: Measured by Reaction Times
There are a limited number of ways to discover and understand how the human mind works and reacts to things. One can not sit and directly observe the brain and eye working together (James, Schneider & Rodgers, 1994). The concept behind mental rotation of images tries to do this by measuring reaction times as the angular disparity of an object increases. Thus, demonstrating the time it takes for the eye and brain to make a connection when presented with a stimulus. Though our experiment was solely limited to calculating reaction times to mental rotations of images, Wohlschlager and Wohlschlager (1998) took this concept one step further to see if mental object rotation and manual object rotation shared a common thought process in our brain.
Wohlschlager & Wohlschlager (1998) based their ideas for this study on a theory, most impressively demonstrated by Cooper (1976), stating that the resemblance of mental rotation to external physical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reaction time reported with our experimental results is to show how long and difficult that it took to identify the scene change.The slower the reaction time ,the more difficult to identify the scene change.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This test combines many different parts of the brain together to test the full speed of the efferent and afferent pathways. This test not only involves the occipital lobe and motor cortex but also the frontal and temporal bone which are used more for interpreting. First for sorting the cards into two piles by colors, Subject 1, 2 and 3 had faster times than the average of 48.713 seconds. While subject 4,5 and 6 experienced slower times than the average. This is because again like the reaction ruler the subjects who had a faster time had faster pathways…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humphreys, G. W. & Bruce, V. (1989). Visual Cognition: Computational, experimental, and neuropsychological perspectives. (pp. 89-101). East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The experiment tries to show that people can not only create images but also mentally transform them. They present the subjects with two 3D line-drawing of random block shapes. The subjects are asked to decide if the two images are the same object by pressing two different keys on the keyboard. In some cases the two images are the same object with one rotated by some degree. In other cases the two images are mirror images that are similar but not identical. The mirror images are also rotated sometimes. The dependent variable is the reaction time. The independent variables are stimuli that have the same shapes vs. stimuli that have different shapes, and the degree of rotation. The control conditions are the multiple trials and the selection of only correct responses. The hypothesis is that if the reaction time is affected by the degree of rotation of the images, subjects perform the task by mental rotation of the drawings because it takes time to rotate the mental images just like real images. The result shows that the reaction time is indeed affected by the degree of rotation; therefore, it demonstrates the hypothesis that people can mentally rotate images. It takes more time for subjects to react when the degrees of rotation increase. There are some methodology problems in this experiment design. First, the block-shape 3D images are hard to identify even one at a time for some people and the test only takes correct answer into consideration. The repetition of the tests may cause fatigue to some subjects and the correct answers can be generated by random clicking of images. Second, the block-shape objects are not something that we can encounter in the real life so the subjects may have to take extra effort to analyze the images. Finally, the correct answer can be derived by ways other than mental rotation. For example, you can simply just find a starting point of the block-shape images and ‘walk through’ the images to see if the two images have the same ‘route’…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A. Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, U.S.A.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stroop

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Dyer,EN.(1973).The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual cognitive and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1,106-120.…

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psych

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Course Syllabus Psychology 431 - B: Cognitive Psychology – Spring 2013 Classroom: HLSB 366 Time: TR 11:00 am to 12:15 pm Instructor Dr. Maya M. Khanna Office: HLS 331 Phone: (402) 280-3452 E-mail: mayakhanna@creighton.edu Office Hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays 1:15 – 2:00 pm and 3:15 to 3:45pm, by appointment, and by email during weekdays. Teaching Assistant Brittany Zastrow Office: HLS 324 E-mail: Brittanyzastrow@creighton.edu Office Hours: Mondays 1:30 to 2:30pm and Wednesdays 9:30 – 10:30 am Text Ashcraft, M.H. & Radvansky, G. A. (2010). Cognition. (5th Edition), Belmont, CA: Prentice Hall. Course Description This course is concerned with the scientific study of cognition. The focus will be on the research and theories that have been central to the field. Topics for the course include the history of psychology leading up to the cognitive revolution, cognitive neuroscience, attention, sensation and perception, memory, concept formation, language, computer models, decision making, problem solving, intelligence, and more. Educational Goals 1) To generate interest in cognitive psychology. 2) To advance knowledge about cognitive psychology. 3) To encourage the application of this knowledge. 4) To develop creative thinking. 5) To develop analytical skills. Learning Outcomes 1) Students will demonstrate content knowledge of key issues in cognitive psychology. 2) Students will identify and explain key components of traditional and contemporary theories in cognitive psychology. 3) Students will identify and discuss research designs (e.g., correlational, experimental) used to examine cognition. 4) Students will critically evaluate theories in cognitive psychology. Course Announcements and Postings Including Class Cancellations: Often it will be necessary to make course-related announcements outside of the class meeting time. These course announcements will be made on the Blueline2 course website, which can be found at…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Power of Habit

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages

    processes can be equally complex and wondrous. The human ability to reflect, to understand and…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case (2) is also cognitive, even though it is a physical rotation and not mental rotation like case (1) and (3) it is not fundamentally different. Since with the rotation button, case (2) displays the same sort of computational structure as case (3). The difference between case (2) and (3) is that the computational structure is spread across the person and the computer, case (2) being external while case (3) is internalised within the person. If case (3) is similar to case (1) and the rotating of the shapes is through the neural implant still counts as a cognitive process, then there is no reason of denying that the rotating method in case (2) would also count as a cognitive process, or as part of a cognitive process. As previously stated, the computational structure in case (2) is the same as case (3) and although in case (3) the computational structure is internalised within the person, nothing else of significance seems different according to Clark and…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are Faces Special?

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Bibliography: Andrews, T. J. & Schluppeck, D., Humfray, D., et al. (2002). Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin’s Vase-face illusion. Neuroimage, 17, 890-901.…

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Itier and Taylor (2004) conducted a study involving 450 gray-scale pictures including upright and inverted faces. ERP recordings showed that attention to a facial stimulus was about 25 msec faster than attention to a non-face object. Participants were able to recognise faces faster than other images irrespective of their relevance and orientation in the visual display. These results may provide evidence for specific face perception and recognition abilities in the temporal domain (Itier & Taylor 2004). Results were very similar with those presented in Caldera, Thut, Servoir, Michel, Bovit and Renault (2003) race facial study.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The goal of this paper is to focus on how gender affects what people see in optical illusions. The differences of male and female brains affect how boys and girls act and perceive the world. If there’s a difference in the vision of boys and girls then there will probably be a difference in how they see an optical illusion. Studies show that there are multiple differences in the male and female brain. There are different types of optical illusions, but this paper is mainly about ambiguous illusions because that is what will be used in the experiment. Ambiguous illusions are pictures with multiple images in them. Evidence from the brain proves that our eyes never actually play tricks on us. It’s our brains and how they perceive the information our eyes send to it. To answer the question, do boys and girls see optical illusions differently, the brain’s relationship with the eyes, the differences between the male and female brain, the differences in the male and female visual system, and how optical illusions work must be factors to understand the subject completely.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Blake, R., & Sekular, R. (2006). Perception (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill…

    • 2385 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Managing people

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    visual or relational images in our mind, such as what the classroom looks like or…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays