Preview

Menendez Brothers

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1120 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Menendez Brothers
Legal and Ethical Case study
The Menendez Brothers
Jessica Armenta

The Legal and Ethical issues

The legal issue here is a double homicide. The two young men, Lyle Menendez and Erik Menendez, were accused and later convicted of killing their parents. On the night of the murder, their parents, Jose Menendez and Kitty Anderson, were at lying on the couch asleep when their two sons came in and shot them both dead with shotguns. The shot guns were purchased several days before, showing premeditation. The boys purposely chose to murder their parents on a night when their maid was off work, displaying special legal circumstances “lying and wait.” Due to these “special circumstances” the Menendez brothers were eligible for the death penalty. The brother’s defense was that they were sexually and psychologically abused by their mother and father for years. The brothers painted a picture of how controlling and abusive their father was and that their mother was emotionally and mentally unstable. The brothers never mentioned a word about the alleged abuse before the trial started, not even to their psychotherapist Dr. Jerome Oziel. The boys said that they feared their parents were going to kill them and they acted upon it by killing them out of fear. The prosecution claimed that the boys were selfish and that their motive was greed because they were not going to put into their fathers will. There are a few pieces of evidence that really make the brothers story hard to believe. One is the 911 call where the boys acted like they were upset that “someone killed their parents.” Two, after their parents were dead the young men spent approximately one million dollars of their parents money on over indulging themselves. Three, the tapes that were retrieved from their psychotherapist contained their confession. In these tapes they threatened his life if Dr. Oziel turned them in. The Menendez brothers had two trials, both in which they plead not guilty. The first one ended

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since nothing like this happened prior the criminal code was very narrow on the sentencing for murder, this actually allowed changes to happen within the criminal code. Which would make sense given the circumstance. Before this situation everyone that was convicted with murder, didn’t have a legit reason as to why the person’s life was taken. In my opinion people just kill because they have problems within themselves of out of hate for the person. But in this situation there was a somewhat positive reason to why a life was being taken.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All three of the boys should have been charged for what happened the night of January 18th. Weather they be charged for being there and taking place at the night of the murder or providing weapons. Using the evidence that was at the crime scene could have clearly helped Miguel Martinez receive a smaller sentence, and justify putting the other two boys in jail as well. I also believe that the police and maybe even the DAs office could have tampered with the evidence being lost or…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    O. J. Simpson Case Summary

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Colley Jr. was an ordinary man with little money and no fame. He shot and killed his wife, Amanda Cloaninger-Colley and her close friend, Lindy Dobbins on August 27, 2015. He fled from the police but was later arrested and found guilty of both murders. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were found murdered outside of Simpson’s condo. Her husband, at the time, was the very famous and very wealthy professional football player Orenthal James Simpson, also known as O.J. Simpson. He fled from the police and was arrested. Simpson was the key suspect in both murders, but after a lengthy trial, he was later exonerated on all charges. How could this wealthy man not get charged with murder, when he was clearly the perpetrator?…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defense believed Casey acted as if nothing had happened when Caylee drowned, due to the events that occurred in her past. Casey was supposedly molested when she was younger by her father, though there was no evidence. The defense said that because she had learned to keep that a secret most of her life, which was what made her keep her daughters drowning a secret as well. The prosecution on the other hand, believed she did it because she wanted her former life back. Casey Anthony had Caylee when she was 22 years old. At that age, people are learning through the actions they make. Adulthood was thrown in her face when she had Caylee. She did not get to experience the life her friends were now having. Therefore, in Casey’s mind the only way to get back the life she wanted was to kill her daughter. Weeks after her daughter goes missing, she goes back to this lifestyle, which in itself is a motive to eliminate her…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was stated that the prosecution was not able to present neither a murder weapon nor an eye witness at the trial. They also brought up that the DNA evidence could have been contaminated while in the lab. The way in which the victims were killed was consisted with those related to drug crimes, since they allegedly befriended a person that owed money to Columbian drug traffickers. Most importantly, OJ Simpson was physically unable to commit a crime of that sort because Ronald was a young man that would put up a fight, while OJ was a middle-aged man that suffered from chronic arthritis. Lastly, the single dark glove found t the crime scene was unable to fit OJ’s…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Oj Simpson Book Report

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Their deaths astonished the public and it was even more shocking that O.J. Simpson was the primary suspect. People didn’t want to believe it, but the information the news reporters were giving was too legitimate not to believe. Throughout the confession, O.J. repeatedly declared himself not guilty of the murders. That was the first thing he wanted to put out along with suggesting the reader to leave everything they knew about this case to the side. Then, he introduced himself. He began talking about his ex wife, Marguerite, and their two children, Arnelle and Jason. Their marriage, after ten years started falling out. He…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mirabal Sisters

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Time of the Butterflies is a book about a family of sisters that fight to take back their right of freedom in the Dominican Republic. The Mirabal sisters grew up in a prosperous family and were well cultured and educated women at a time when most women did not obtain a good education. It is important to know what the Mirabal sisters did for their country and how their past actions still affect and impact the people today in the Dominican Republic. To win this freedom, the Mirabal sisters had to give up their well-being, give up their childhoods, and give up their lives. Julia Alvarez, the author of the book, takes the readers through these sisters’ journeys of fighting against their dictator Trujillo, and the many adversities while…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmett Till Questions

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The jury ruled the two men as not guilty. Even after the two men admitted to killing the boy, no one went to jail after the prosecution.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This proves to me that Harris was a fake and trying to hide his emotions; Harris only got emotional when it was him who was dying; this tells me that he only cares about himself. Harris must have thought that if the families were there to see him die then they might have forgiven him. Instead, by using the word ‘deny’ it shows that he hasn’t realised how much pain he actually caused. I believe that the families had the right to watch him be executed because they needed the justice for the death of their children. Some people may say that everyone has the right for a private death because they believe it is more enlightened. I think that not everyone deserves to die privately because not everyone is civilised; Harris was not a civilised man.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: Nine young black boys riding in an open train car were involved in a fight. When the fight ceased, two white women claimed the black boys raped them. Once the boys got off the train in Scottsboro, Alabama, police picked them up and placed them in jail. The men appeared in court, frightened, and unrepresented. The defendants were charged with a capital offence and therefore had the right for counsel to be appointed to them by the court. However, the court decided to call on the lawyers from the surrounding area. Of course no lawyer came to their defense. The day before the case, on April 6, a lawyer took their case. Because he was not able to prepare an adequate defense 8 of the 9 defendants were convicted and sentenced to death.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rubout Argument Analysis

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Here, we must answer both possibilities with an if-then argument. If (1) was true, then constitution-wise, it’s unquestionably wrong. This one can go a long way. First, the judge didn’t ask for their opinion for justice. In fact, the two we’re still going to have a trial. And by the new law—the death sentence has been, so to speak, rubbed-out. For if they killed the two for moral reasons like vigilantes would reason-out, then again it’s still wrong for no one has the right to put the law in his/her own hands.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Founding Brothers

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My favorite chapter was the chapter about the duel. The duel was my favorite chapter because the duel seemed never ending and exciting. The chapter began with background information about Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr family lives. After the background information is passed, the chapter goes into great detail about the duel. Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton were not friends. Hamilton helped Thomas Jefferson defeat Burr in the Presidential election. later on when Burr was Vice President, he ran for governor in New York. Hamilton had such a great influence on his home state that Burr lost the election to be governor. Burr had challenged Hamilton to a duel because of some offensive comments from Hamilton. Ultimately, Burr had severely wounded Hamilton, who died days later. According to the chapter, two shots were heard, Hamilton died but Burr claims he never shot at Hamilton. So because Burr denies shooting at Hamilton, it makes you think what really happened? This chapter was my favorite because it actually forced me to think about what really happened with the two shots heard.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The juvenile and adult court system often times try to lump people that commit similar crimes together, it is not always a “fair trial” as promised by our declaration. If my neighbor was to murder his parents for whatever reason, and I was to do the same, we would be both looked at as two horrible kids who did the unthinkable act of patricide, not why.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Mercy Definition

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It should not make a difference to what color one is, where they are from, or how rich they are, they deserve a chance for a fair trial. However, it will not change for a long time because we live in a corrupt system that revolves around who has the most money at the end of the day. McMillian was assigned a lawyer who did not care what happened to him and barely tried because he was not rich and did not grow up in the best community. I am not saying what McMillian did was right, but I am saying that he did not deserve the death penalty. He lived a hard life and was only trying to create a new better one.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the song, it had all been decided before hand. The District Attorney (D.A.) was “[practicing] all his lines in the mirror.” He knew what the outcome was going to be, and so did everybody else. They must’ve all “read the morning paper, The headline [read] “the man hangs” but the jury doesn’t.” The D.A. doesn’t have to say anything to convince the jury over- a hung jury is an undecided jury-they agree with what the newspaper says. The man is already hung. Just like in TKAM, Tom Robinson had no chance to win. But even if some of the jury isn’t convinced-Mr. Cunningham-the Prosecutor can just “pay to close it like a casket.” Even the witness is payed off he is, “Too well dressed for the witness stand” AKA he just got new clothes. Hmm, maybe a new paycheck?? The defendant has no chance, he either “[Hangs] on a rope, or bated breath.” The death penalty will be served, or the suspense will end him. Game over. To add to the injustice of this case “The press prays for whichever headline is worse.” The accused has nothing going for him. The jury, either they get payed to vote against him, or they agree with the Prosecutor. The witness already got payed off to say the ‘right’ thing; and the press just doesn’t care-unless it will help them sell papers. That dude couldn’t catch a break. The 5 minorities arrested had DNA proof-DNA that is I believe 100% accurate, they were innocent and no amount of arguing could prove it another way-yet they still were convicted. Tom Robinson had the 1930’s version of DNA proof, yet he stood no chance at being…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays