Preview

Melian Dialogue

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Melian Dialogue
Kavon Nowroozi
Honors English 10
20 November 2012
Freedom vs. Survival in The Melian Dialogue The Melian Dialogue, written by Thucydides, is an account of the confrontation between the people of Melos and the people of Athens. Melos was a small island off the southeastern coast of Greece that tried to remain independent and neutral during the Peloponnesian War. The Athenians wanted to gain control of Melos in order to intimidate the Spartans. The theme of freedom vs. survival is evident throughout this dialogue, as the Melians do not want to succumb their freedom to the Athenians, whatever the price. The Athenians doggedly try to convince the Melians that they will not be able to survive on their own, but the Melians refuse their offer. Their steadfastedness is characteristic of a phenomenon seen throughout history. When people posses enough hope and courage, they are inspired to fight for their freedom, even when their survival is not guaranteed. The Melians were fiercely independent people who valued their freedom highly. "If we submit at once, our position is desperate; if we fight, there is still hope that we shall stand secure" (28), were the words of the Melians. There is a great sense of unity among the people, and although they are part of just a small island, it is evident that they share a sense of hope. Hope can be thought of as a sense of optimism. Together with courage, it drives people to fight or stand up for their beliefs. Usually in life, people who have hope are among the most successful people, because they are not willing to give in to ideas they don't believe in. The Melians do not in any way consider themselves any less superior than the Athenians, even when they are told that, "the most successful people are those who stand up to their equals, behave properly to their superiors, and treat their inferiors fairly." The Melians know that the Athenians have a stronger army, and more resources, but they are not intimidated. They are told

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pericles, being the man of approved “wisdom and eminent reputation,” was chosen by the state to administer an appropriate eulogy. He begins his Oration by commending all those who contributed their lives to defending the Athenian Empire. Quickly after his appraisal, Pericles transitions into glorifying the democratic institutions in which Athens was founded upon. “And if our more remote ancestors deserve praise, much more do our own fathers, who added to their inheritance the empire which we now possess, and spared no to be able to leave their acquisitions to us of the present generation.” (2.36, PG. 112) Pericles continues by describing how democracy not only exhibits freedom in government, but also in ordinary life, which in turn allowed the public to pursue means of…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After consultations with its allies, Sparta sent a deputation to Athens demanding certain concessions, such as the immediate expulsion of the Alcmaeonidae family including Pericles and the retraction of the Megarian Decree, threatening war if the demands were not met. The obvious purpose of these proposals was the instigation of a confrontation between Pericles and the people; this event, indeed, would come about a few years later. At that time, the Athenians unhesitatingly followed Pericles' instructions. In the first legendary oration Thucydides puts in his mouth, Pericles advised the Athenians not to yield to their opponents' demands, since they were militarily stronger. Pericles was not prepared to make unilateral concessions, believing that "if Athens conceded on that issue, then Sparta was sure to come up with further demands". Consequently, Pericles asked the Spartans to offer a quid pro quo. In exchange for retracting the Megarian Decree, the Athenians demanded from Sparta to abandon their practice of periodic expulsion of foreigners from their territory and to recognize the…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydides, a known historian during the time, described and analyzed the motives of the infamous Peloponnesian War. The war was between two powerful city-states: Athens and Sparta. The conflict arose due to excessive power. The Athenians were optimistic that they were the driving force that led Greece and all of its city-states. Specifically, the historian focuses on the funeral oration presented by Pericles. Pericles, ironically, doesn’t display sorrow but displays comfort and proud of what each individual has contributed to Athens. For Pericles, it wasn’t about the tragic fatalities but about courage and patriotism. Pericles believes in Athens and knows that this city-state possesses many freedoms and opportunities for success and peace.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maigread Monologue

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Both our parents clapped loudly. Mother was beside herself. She had cried all through the song. I hadn’t seen her cry since my father died. “That was beautiful, Maighread—absolutely beautiful, you two,” said my mother tearfully.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Athens’ quest for a great empire, they planned to dominate their lesser foes, add to their empire, and show their strength; these pursuits brought them to the city of Melos. Melos was a small island in the Aegean Sea and a colony of Sparta, but they where a neutral state; they were not allied with either side. They had not been involved in the Peloponnesian war as of yet, and did not plan on getting involved. Then, Athens came, demanding surrender and tribute, but Melos chose to resist, rather than submit. Athens believed that because they had might on their side, that they also had the right to conquer weaker city-states (“The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”).…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They also fell noticeably short of their own military ambitions and perceptions. They boasted that they were more than strong enough to hold their own and that their “diplomacy” of promising freedom for those who submitted to their rule could win over any hostile outsiders. Yet, in their attempted “negotiations” with the Melians, the Athenians essentially admitted they could not accept neutrality because they were afraid of looking weak in the eyes of their subjects. In a sense, the Athenians admitted their shortcomings right to their enemies’ faces. A stable empire with a truly strong military would not possess such a fear, at least not to the extent that its policies would revolve around that fear. Furthermore, the Melians pointed out that the Athenians’ rationale and strategy were fairly absurd: they should instead allow the Melians and others to remain neutral. By being aggressive conquerors, the Athenians will only create more bitterness, anger, and resentment among their subjects, and thus invite more hostility from their subjects and outsiders. The Athenians, letting their pride come first, rejected this argument and refused to consider the possibility of a friendly yet neutral…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He proclaims, “In proof of this it may be noticed that the Lacedaemonians do not invade our country alone, but bring with them all their confederates.” (DWP, p. 58). But we see stark contrast to Pericles speech when the army of Athens arrives at Melians shores and orders them to surrender to Athens although Melians wanted to remain neutral and join neither the Spartans nor the Athenians. But the Athenian army simply dismisses the Melians request to remain independent and neutral and instead forcefully drives them out of their territory. This egotistical act of Athenians towards Melians obliterates Pericles claims of liberality. And even further the main argument that Athenians use in conquering Melians is in irony with Pericles speech which reads as such, “ And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do….” (DWP, p. 62). If Athens and Athenians were in fact just and fair, as Pericles claims then the latter part of the argument where they say, “and shall leave it to exist for ever after us” (DWP, p. 62) should have been done away with.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Pericles began the war, the strategy was for athens to stay behind the walls (not to fight the Spartans on land – in funeral speech) – Spartans are better fighters…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates next confronts the charge in which he is detrimental to society. Meletus still on the stand gets asked by Socrates how he can be detrimental to society if he himself actually is apart of society. Why would he voluntary hurt himself as he regards this as foolish as no person in there right mind would cause harm to themselves. Socrates then goes on to point out one who unintentionally does harm as Meletus suggested should be taught on how to not do harm instead of just being punished for…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is due to the high regard the ancient Greeks held for their language. The regard for their language is demonstrated in a speech by Nicias, an Athenian general, to his troops before facing impending defeat, in which he acknowledged their allies as Athenians, not due to similarity in origin, but rather their sharing of language placing them at equal prestige (Thucydides, Book IV, chapter XXIII). One of the finest examples of the artistry of Thucydides’ craftsmanship of speeches, is the speech given by Pericles, an important Athenian politician, at a public funeral, after the first year of the war. This speech is among the most celebrated of the ancient Greeks, due to the inclusion of a passionate tribute to the fallen and glorification of Athens and the polis’ causes. Within the glorification of Athens, he emphasized the sophistication of Athens and their aptitude for art of the mind. The first reference is towards the beginning of the address with these words, “Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighboring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves.” These references continue throughout including, “Further, we provide plenty of means for the mind to refresh itself from business,” and “In short, I say that as a city we are the school of Hellas, while I doubt if the world can produce a man who, where he has only…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mercutio Monologue

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After I had went to have a walk around Verona, my own company is becoming mundane.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whenever there is an argument or war there is always differences between both parties involved. In order to understand the causes of the Peloponnesian War, we must look at their differences. One of the main differences that the Athenians and the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is due to them, that the struggles of war have commenced. Recently we have dispatched envoys to the island of Melos with the supposed intentions of negotiations. These citizens of Athenian convictions have reported to us the intentions of the Melians. I quote the segment of their speech that detailed their reasoning of the negotiations with the Melians concerning power “of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An account of the Athenian Mitylenian Debate from Thuycidides’s History of the Peloponessian War illustrates how the democratic process impedes decision-making in…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays