Preview

Medicine and Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1072 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medicine and Law
On February 11, 2003, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the State of Arkansas could force death row prisoner Charles Laverne Singleton to take antipsychotic drugs to make him sane enough to execute. Singleton was to be executed for felony capital murder but became insane while in prison. "Medicine is supposed to heal people, not prepare them for execution; a law that asks doctors to make people well so that the government can kill them is an absurd law," said David Kaczynski, the executive director of New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty .
There are many arguments in this passage. The first argument is this passage is “medicine is supposed to heal people, not prepare them for execution”. The premise is “medicine is supposed to heal people, not prepare them for execution” and the conclusion is “medicine shouldn’t kill people”. The second argument in this passage is “a law that asks doctors to make people well so that the government can kill them in an absurd law”. The premise is “a law that asks doctors to make people well to kill them” and the conclusion is “the law is absurd”.
This passage depicts many issues occurring in America today. Although, the prisoner Charles Laverne Singleton was convicted to the death penalty, using doctors and medicine to execute him is wrong. Medicine was created to heal people from disease and prevent illness. Doctors became physicians to support people, save lives, and educate individuals to increase their quality of life. When doctors graduated from medical school they took an oath to help save lives. Participating in an execution goes against the laws medical ethics and everything a physician stands for. Arguments for this passageway may include the amount of money it takes to keep the prisoner in jail, lethal injection is a less violent way of execution, and a doctor is the most qualified person to give a lethal injection. Although, keeping convicts in jail costs a lot of tax payers’ dollars, there are other
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gp Practitioner Killed 250 Patients: Article Analysis
    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gp Practitioner Killed 250 Patients: Article Analysis

    Associate Ltd (2005) article show that in 1971 a Gp Practitioner murdered 250 patients over a 27 year period in practice. The author believes that the event that occurred in the article contradicts the legal law of rights to life because the Gp deprived 250 patients of unlawful violence and death (Libadmin 2010). It could be argued life is sacred; every individual has a right to preserve their own life and therefore is wrong to end another’s regardless of ethnic or cultural differences (rsrevision 2015). Homicide act (1957) questions the rights of life as it creates a double effect whether it is ethical right if a patient complies with ending their life. For example, patient wanting death through overdose or pain relief, we are unable to know…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sell Vs United States Case Study
    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sell Vs United States Case Study

    Singleton had been sentenced to death in 1979. As he began to deteriorate mentally in 1987, he exhibited paranoid and delusional symptoms. He was diagnosed with schizophrenia. Medication was necessary to control these symptoms. Ten years later, he expressed distorted beliefs and that he was going to kill a physician and the president. Because of his dangerousness, the Medical Review Panel agreed to force medication on him under a Harper involuntary medication order. The Due Process Clause allows them to do so since he is a seriously mentally ill inmate who may be a danger to himself and others and it may be in his best interests. In 2000, he had a petition filed for habeas corpus contesting that the state could not make him competent with medication and then have him executed. His petition was denied by the district court because they found “no evidence in this record that the actions and the decisions of the medical personnel involved were in any degree motivated by the desire, purpose or intent to make Mr. Singleton competent so that he could be executed”. The appellate court had two questions to answer, (1) was he competent to be executed before execution of the forced medication order? They found that he wasn’t competent enough to understand the punishment…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kevorkian Assisted Suicide
    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kevorkian Assisted Suicide

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jack Kevorkian
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jack Kevorkian

    I think that one of the biggest miscarriages of justice that I witnessed in my lifetime was that of Dr. Jack Kevorkian receiving a 10 to 25 year sentence for wanting to help end the suffering of a helpless human-being. Dubbed "Dr. Death" by the media frenzy that followed the actions of the controversial physician, he received this sentence for helping to end the life of 52 year old Thomas Youk, who was fighting a hopeless battle with Lou Gehrig's disease. Dr. Kevorkian set up his "suicide machine" in order for the person to knowlingly and voluntarily disperse the chemical concoction that would end the suffering of the victim his family. Although Dr. Kevorkian assisted in the death of 35 people, it was the Thomas Youk case that brought national attention and thus the wrath of the criminal justice system of the state of Michigan. Similar to phsycian-suicide is the issue of both voluntary and involuntary active euthanasia. Both of these involve carrying out the death of another human being, who either knowingly or unknowlingly makes that decision. What makes the case of Dr. Kevorkian different is that he met with all of his patients and recorded the fact that they were coherent and able to make their own decision about the ending their life. I am guessing that when the Thomas Youk story aired on 60 Minutes in 1998, it brought national scutiny and a mockery of the laws in the eyes of the Michigan criminal justice system. I wanted to better understand this concept the particulars about this case and what the overwhelming public opinion on the topic was nationally and within the state of Michigan.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Singleton v. State
    • 272 Words
    • 1 Page

    Singleton v. State

    Singleton vs. state is a trial in which the morality of executing a prisoner with a mental illness is being delved into. Charles Singleton committed a murder in his early twenties, and was sentenced to death by the state of Arkansas. However, after the appeals process had died down, Singleton began exhibiting the signs of the dreaded mental disorder schizophrenia. Due to federal law explicitly stating a prisoner with a metal illness cannot receive capital punishment, Singleton was removed from death row. After being put on proper medication, Singleton’s symptoms were under control. Thus, a state judge agreed that the execution could be performed.…

    • 272 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Weeds vs. Flowers
    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Weeds vs. Flowers

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a firm believer in physician-assisted suicide, giving his patients the dignity and respect that they deserved in making this last major decision for their life and how they wanted to end it. His patients thought of him as a hero because he aided them in their major time of need, and they felt very comfortable with him because they didn’t have to worry about feeling awkward when bringing up this method of help. The family members of Kevorkian’s patients were ultimately happy that he provided such ease to their loved ones, and showed nothing but care and respect for those individuals. This decision is a heavy burden to bear because of the feelings that the majority of people feel is wrong and immoral. Dr. Kevorkian was convicted of second degree murder in 1999 because of assistance with euthanizing one of his patients Thomas Youk, who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease in 1998. He was provided with financial support by an organization called “The Hemlock Society” for his lawsuit, and they also referred patients to him for their aid in finding a caring physician that would end their suffering.…

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Awakenings Project
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Awakenings Project

    1. The abuses at Bainbridge Hospital reflected a broken system at that time. Any person who was deemed untreatable was put into a “garden”- where people were treated like flowers that were simply “watered” and “fed” every day. The attitude of the people who worked at the institution was of people who had accepted the system’s failures as a way of life; they did not strive for change, they simply “went with the flow.” Dr. Sayer introduces a number of attitudes that can be seen in modern care facilities. For example, his unfailing persistence in not giving up on patients who he believed had a chance at life. These patients had been immobile for decades, with countless people telling him that they would never get better. By believing in their cognizance and their persistent awareness of their surroundings, Dr. Sayer creates the hospital environment of today, punctuated with the idea that all patients should have the chance to have the best chance in life. He never gave up hope. However, Dr. Sayer also faced many different obstacles in attempting to treat his patients. For example, he needed to first overcome the mockery of his fellow coworkers. The doctors and nurses who worked with him did not understand his desires to pursue what seemed like a meaningless waste of time. However, in doing so, he gave life back to people who would have otherwise been trapped forever, in a state of permanent limbo. Later, he also faced the crisis of dosage with his “patient zero”, Leonard. Would he cross the line and illegally dose Leonard without the consent of the pharmacist? In doing so, he achieved success. However, he had to do so by compromising the laws set by society. Moreover, he had to muster funding for the drug for all the patients that had been affected at the institution. He could have given up after the head of the hospital told him that it was simply too much money, but he persisted in his efforts and was rewarded with enough funding for…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong: Article Analysis
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong: Article Analysis

    As a doctor, you swear to an oath that is to provide lifesaving medical care and to try and extend life comfortably, the best way you can. In “Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Always Wrong” Ryan T. Anderson states why a physician assisting in a terminally ill patient’s death is ethically and morally wrong. This article that I chose was published on Newsweek on March 26, 2015, but first appeared on The Daily Signal. As the article describes what and how this particular approach works, it goes in great detail to explain why it should not even be an option for physicians.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty In Nebraska
    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Death Penalty In Nebraska

    In the article “The Federal Government Plans To Seize Nebraska’s Illegal Execution Drug Shipment When It Arrives In The U.S.”, author Chris McDaniel writes about a letter from the FDA explaining that Nebraska next shipment of execution drugs would be illegal. As well, the repeal of the death penalty that happened in the Nebraska legislature. The death penalty is a dividing issue in the United States because the ongoing debate over its constitutionality. In this debate over its constitutionality, I side against the death penalty. I am against the death penalty because if exonerating evidence surfaces after a prisoner is executed there is no way to fix it. Also, I question the appropriate method for execution with the issue of cruel and unusual…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Euthanasia Ethically Wrong

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay

    Even though many believe that Physician assisted suicide should be legalized because it allows one to make their own choice of when to die, as well as dying with dignity. It also allows better care because of all the rules and regulations. Doctors also need to learn to handle the fact that they helped someone die. That is something that can be difficult to accept and sometimes gets to be too much for the doctor to handle. They also need to be able to handle the situation…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Physician Assisted Death
    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Physician Assisted Death

    himself does not make killing right.”(NYLN) The doctors are not killing the patients. They are…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mentally Ill Executions
    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Mentally Ill Executions

    Forcing death row inmates to take medication to be sane enough to execute, is a legal, moral and ethical debate that will continue for a long time. "In 1986, the United States Supreme Court decided Ford v. Wainwright, holding that the execution of the mentally incompetent violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. A prisoner cannot be executed unless sufficiently competent to understand the…

    • 3139 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    medical law project
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    medical law project

    1. Under HIPAA, are you legally allowed to view this patient’s medical information? Why or why not?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia: Death and Healthy Mental State
    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthanasia: Death and Healthy Mental State

    Sub-point 2: These doctors sole purpose of killing them is to stop their suffering and anguish.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics