Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Maximilien Robespierre, the Incorruptible Leader

Powerful Essays
1849 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maximilien Robespierre, the Incorruptible Leader
George Washington's chopping of the cherry tree to the Holocaust of Adolf Hitler, historical figures are remembered for their actions as heroic or demonic. Maximilien-Francois-Marie-Isidore de Robespierre, the chief architect of the Reign of Terror and a bloodthirsty revolutionary democrat, was one such man that is now known as the incorruptible leader. Robespierre played a vital role in the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution. The Reign of Terror was a filtration to purge the streets of France of the enemies of the Republic, as Robespierre claimed. Instead, the Reign proved none other than a ruthless mass murder of the enemies of the Republic that was enjoyed as entertainment by the Republicans.

Maximilien Robespierre was born in Arras, a small provincial capital of Artois in France, on May 6, 1758. Jacqueline-Marguerite Carraut, daughter of a brewer and mother of Robespierre, died giving birth to her fifth child. Robespierre's father, Maximilien-Barthelemy Francois, then left his four children (one having died at child birth) under the care of relatives, leaving Robespierre almost an orphan at the age of eight.

Robespierre's talent of speech became evident in his youth when Robespierre was chosen to address King Louis XVI. It is said that when Robespierre finished his Latin oration, King Louis smiled at him. Robespierre would later make numerous speeches, supporting the equality of the people, claiming that "freedom of the press goes hand in hand with freedom of speech.(Rude 21)" Being popular among the commoners, Robespierre was one of the first to speak in favor of granting suffrage to all citizens. This shows that once Robespierre put his mind to something, he would remain dedicated to it and would stop at nothing to reach his goals. It is rumored that he also kept a copy of The Social Contract by his bedside, showing that Robespierre was as determined and faithful as those who keep a copy of the Bible by their bedside.

In 1765, Robespierre attended college at a local college in Arras, but was later transferred to the famous college of Louis-le Grand in Paris after people saw how intelligent he was. In Louis-le Grand College, Robespierre studied philosophy and law, coming under the influence of Jean Jaques Rousseau's theories of democracy and deism. This influence gave Robespierre his ways towards virtue and civic morality. When corruption spread throughout the French government, Robespierre refused to be affected by bribery or corruption. When he was elected deputy, he was exposed to millions of francs daily, yet he wasn't even tempted to take a single franc that he didn't work for. For Robespierre's honesty and trustworthiness, he earned the nickname "The Incorruptible."

After attending college, Robespierre joined the Breton Club, later the Jacobins, in May of 1789. Later, Robespierre became the head of the Jacobin Club and was appointed to the Committee of Public Safety, a committee that was created to spread the belief that the government is kind to the people, while, in truth, Robespierre was killing people by the thousands. During the Reign of Terror, Robespierre cared for no man. When the time arose, Robespierre condemned the once greatly respected King Louis XVI and his wife to the guillotine without hesitation. To Robespierre, "the right of punishing the tyrant and the right of dethroning him are the same things, (Rude 34)" in which Robespierre's statement justified the execution of Louis XVI as rightly done as overthrowing a tyrant.

With his ambition, Robespierre cared less for his friends and family, believing that he would always have the support of the people. Like Caesar, Robespierre tries to hide his ambition, as in his speech in the Jacobin club on April 10, 1791, "as if I were so foolish as to wish to destroy the type of government that best accords with the interests of a great people...jealous of the government of Poland. (Carr 156)" Robespierre wanted power and the support of the people; therefore he made numerous speeches about equality and freedom. As war broke out in France, Robespierre remains unconvinced that monarchy would be revived. Robespierre made a speech on May 17, declaring that war "was both an irrelevance and a diversion, and a course that had little hope of success. (Rude 158)" Robespierre's statement shows that he values the State more than he values the lives of the people.

Robespierre had always kept the belief that the Royals and the King were enemies of the revolution and people. In response to the war, Robespierre gave a speech as a warning, in which he sated "What does it avail us to conquer the kings if we are conquered by the vices that lead to tyranny?(Rude 163)" Robespierre argues that whether war leads to victory or defeat and its threat towards liberty. According to Robespierre's argument, victory in a war may present a greater danger than defeat.

Robespierre never changed his mind so drastically that he came to total rejection of a single idea. Robespierre revealed himself as a man of Enlightment in his speech on May 30, 1791, in which he sated that "the death penalty is fundamentally unjust...it is not the most effective penalties.(Loomis 246)" Robespierre stated that the death penalty would increase the amount of crimes instead of decreasing it. The guillotine was made to strike fear in the people, instead it cause revolts and unjust murders. As a prediction of the Reign of Terror, in which many were killed in public, Robespierre said that if people were tortured and murdered in public, "they will pervert in the citizens' minds all idea of what is just and unjust,(Loomis 246)" which would result in terrible prejudices and cause the people to turn against one another. The horror of a crime diminishes when its only punishment is another crime, daring others to commit more crimes. This results in a rise in the count of crimes. During the Reign of Terror, the only punishment for a crime again the revolutionaries was the loss of one's head, which caused the amount of people sent to the guillotine to increase.

Robespierre never despised the King nor had he loved the King. What Robespierre hated was the crime that Louis has committed. In Robespierre's speech on December 3, 1792, Robespierre stated that he abhors the law stating death penalties are legal as a punishment for a crime and that it is a crime to sentence a person to death. Robespierre then explains that death penalties "can be justified only in cases where it is necessary for the security of the person or the state.(Rude 165)" Robespierre saw the Kings as a threat to the State, so Robespierre declared that "Louis must die in order that our country may live.(Carr 137)" Robespierre stated that Louis was an exception that was allowed to be put to his death, but the Reign of Terror was more than just that.

Even the government was in danger of having its head chopped off if it showed any ill-will towards the Republic. In the summer of 1792, the enemies of the people were few, but during the Terror, assassins, intriguers, and traitors to the Republic's cause increased dramatically. Robespierre had believed that "to the enemies of the people it owes only death.(Carr 138)" The people are the Republicans, in which their safety are offered by society, and the remainder of the people are considered criminals and are sentenced to death. Though royalists and conspirators are not Republicans, they are considered strangers, rather than enemies, to the Republic. Robespierre tried to contain the thrist for blood of the Republicans in his statement, "cursed is the man who dares to inflict on the people the terror that is intended for the people's enemies!(Rude 167)" Unconsciously becoming a "cursed man" himself, Robespierre attempted to speed up the procedures of the Revolutionary Tribunal dealing with the enemies of the Republic; but for many of his colleagues, Robespierre showed mercy, believing that they were merely misled.

Robespierre had a sense of timing. He chose the right moments to carry out policies that had been agreed upon earlier by the State. Robespierre justified his means in his speech of February 5, 1794, that wisdom of the government is shown when "it should take careful note of circumstance, seize the right moment, and choose the means.(Rude 167)" Seizing the right moments is a type of tactical leadership, in which the timing is crucial for maintaining the support of the people.

Robespierre was a persistent watchdog of the revolution. He believed that once he lets down his guard, old ideas and habits would be revived and threaten the stop the Revolution and force it back to base one, the beginning. Robespierre warned the people in his speech on February 1794, "weakness, vice, prejudice are so many sign-posts leading back to monarchy,(Carr 201)" which states that old habit die hard. Unless these old habits are uprooted, they would cause chaos and destroy the Revolution from within. Robespierre sought to create an equal society, in which all Republicans had equal amount of both wealth and property to contain the new ideas. He suggested to "let the maximum of wealth be fixed...let no citizen own more than one workshop or...shop.(Loomis 189)" In addition to these restrictions, the limit to the amount of tools one can own was set too. This shows that Robespierre wanted a classless society in which all people were identical to one another, in terms of wealth and power.

Maximilien Robespierre is a memorable historical figure. His deceitful ways of killing many people, most of them which were probably innocent or didn't deserve the death that they received, ruined his good reputation. Robespierre is revealed as a potential tyrant seeking more power, though he hated other tyrants; but the fact that Robespierre was once an incorruptible leader proves Robespierre as strong willed and determined. By only remembering Robespierre's leadership skills and determination, not at the lives of the people that he destroyed, it shows that Robespierre knew what the people needed and how to keep his rule over the people. Many people after the French Revolution blame Robespierre for the lives lost during the Terror, but Robespierre is really a good man. Robespierre had spent most of his lifetime spreading the idea of revolution and equality for all, repaid only with death. It is said that people are remembered mostly for the bad things they do, not for their good qualities. Maximilien-Francois-Marie-Isidore de Robespierre is one such example.

~~~~

Carr, John Laurence. Robespierre the force of circumstance St. Martin's Press: New York, 1972

Loomis, Stanley. Paris in the Terror: June 1973- July 1794 J. B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia and New York, 1964

Rude, George. Robespierre Protrait of a Revolutionary Democrat The Viking Press: New York, 1975

"SWL" Maximilian Marie Isadore Robespierre. 20 Feb. 2004

"Who2?" MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE * Politician. 20 Feb. 2004

"Steven Kreis" Maximilien Robespierre, 1758-1794 20 Feb. 2004

"Richard Moore" Maximilien Robespierre French lawyer and politician 1758-1794 20 Feb. 2004

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a moment in french history that began in 1793 and ended a year later in 1794. The Reign of Terror was just like how its name sounded; terrifying. Robespierre began the reign of terror the moment the french king, Louis XIV, was guillotined. He claimed that the only way to go through with the french revolution was to rid France of all their enemies and potential threats by beheading them at the guillotine. People may wonder if the Reign of Terror was even justifiable, stating that the French Revolution would have gone through successfully without it, but in all actuality the Reign of Terror was justified by France’s internal and external conflicts along with newer humane methods of ending people’s lives.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Robeson

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Born on April 9, 1898 in Princeton, New Jersey, Paul Robeson was the youngest of five children. His father was a runaway slave who went on to graduate from Lincoln University, and his mother came from a family of Quakers who worked for the abolition of slavery. His family was familiar with hardship and the determination to rise above it. His own life was no less challenging.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ideals of the French Revolution were "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity," but the methods that were used to fulfill these goals were complicated. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were guillotined because of Maximilien Robespierre. He thought that “Liberty could not be secured unless criminals lose their heads”. Napoleon Bonaparte, a Revolutionary hero, seized control of the government in France in 1799, he was looking to bring peace to the French people by ending the Revolution. For this to be done, he had to be in complete control like a monarch or a dictator. However, the French people still wanted to have some of the privileges they had during the Revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized and united French society, yet supported the ideals of French Revolution.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the start of the French Revolution in 1789, the revolutionaries who felt the monarchy was tyrannical exclaimed the timeless words of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. It was on these tenets that the revolution began and ironically only four years later a man of great strength would take control of France and begin the Reign of Terror, this man was Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the mastermind of the Reign of Terror. He was the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, the executive committee of the National Convention, and the most powerful man in France (“History Wiz”). To avert the possibility of a counter-revolution, the guards would send people to the guillotines with no remorse. Evidence was rarely needed to prove that the citizen was against the revolution; suspicion was enough to classify someone as the enemy. Robespierre prospered with the help of the Jacobins, who were the most radical and ruthless of the political groups formed in the wake of the French Revolution.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reign of Terror was a violent and savage part of the French Revolution. The…

    • 666 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1794 Maximilian Robespierre was experiencing the negative repercussions of his creation. The French revolution changed the order of society and it came with a price. Prince Louis the 14th grandson Louis Capet married at age of 15 years old. The prince lacked of experience and social skills and leadership. The wedding was a political union between Austria and France. Marie Antoniette was 14 years old and was not interested in politics. Four years after the wedding Prince Louis the 14th dies leaving the throne to Prince Louis the 16th. He was not ready for the responsibility; he was only 20 years old.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror started with the onset of the French Revolution, and during this period of time anyone thought to be an enemy of the revolution was executed. Document 6 shows a picture of a public execution occurring with thousands of people watching. The primary method of execution was by guillotine and during the Reign of Terror this gruesome contraption took the lives of over 16,000 people over the course of 9 months. The Reign of Terror finally ended with the execution of Robespierre in 1794. When Napoleon seized power in 1799, many citizens saw it as a good thing. They believed France needed a strong leader, and Napoleon filled that description well. Napoleon believed that “To have good soldiers, a nation must always be at war.” (Document 8). He was a very strong military leader, and he always looked to achieve more military conquests. He won lots of crucial battles for France and was remembered as a great war…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre states, “What is the goal toward which we are heading? The peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality.” (Bienvenu, p. 1, para.1) The laws that have been passed by the royalty that are meant to bring long lasting righteousness, are laws that are recognized; these laws are not written any where but in the essence of all individuals. Robespierre was elected as the representative of the National Convention and joined a political club called the radical Jacobin party. Being apart of the Convention and the Jacobins, Robespierre took over the administrative power of the Republic. Because the Jacobins believed that France was in need of change and restructuring, and Robespierre was now the head of the Convention, he can develop such change. By doing so he argues that in the land, the use of ethics must be replaced with the use of pride, proposition for traditions, self-regard for arrogance, magnificence for narcissism, prestige for money, and immorality of the sovereign for virtues and the phenomenon. He believed in democracy and the Republic of virtue. He felt that in order to set the basis of democracy within the people, the merge of both ending the war of independence and oppression must take place in order to put an end to the revolt. The essences of the Republic are virtue and equality. He explains how it is the development of virtue and the maintenance of equality that creates the Republic. Therefore, it is embraced or founded by an individual. He believed that the quality of being an admired government would be an advantage in gaining the trust of the citizens in order to create a strict and rigorous government, “…be trustful towards the people and severe towards itself.” (Bienvenu, p. 2, para. 2) Robespierre states the strengths and weaknesses of this theory: the strength being the triumph of truth rather than dishonesty, and the rights of the community’s interests than the private. The purpose…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren't necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people's enemies by terror. Robespierre also mentions that a popular government in revolution evolves from virtue and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: "virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless." He says, "the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself." In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of despotic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot may govern by terror his brutalized subjects and subdue by terror the enemies of liberty. Even though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and ruthlessness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and ultimately led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn't necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face more…

    • 366 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror began because of the growing suspicion of common people supporting the nobles, and the monarchy. The first victim of this historic era was King Louis XVI, and he was most certainly not the last. Nine months later, Queen Marie Antoinette was too executed by the guillotine. The people were bound to their homes in fear of being accused of committing an offence, leading to arrest or death. Police spies were present all over Paris arresting both guilty and innocent, executing them because of pure suspicion. Some individuals were imprisoned or executed for having been wealthy, or talking to other people outside of their homes. (Doc. 6) This event ended with the beheading of Robespierre, one of the founders of the Reign of Terror, because suspicion became too disorderly and was destroying France as a whole. This mark in French history had to occur in order to show the nobles and the monarchs that they ( the people) weren't going back to the old society, where they had no say and were under unruly law. The founders of the revolution had to instill fear to ensure that the government wouldn't revert back what once…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robespierre Thesis

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, also known as Maximilien de Robespierre, was born on May 6, 1758 in Arras, a city in France approximately 162 kilometers north of Paris. Robespierre was the oldest of four siblings, and his mother died when Robespierre was six years old. Shortly thereafter, his father left him, leaving his maternal grandparents to tend to the four children. The Robespierre family was a member of the Third Estate, which consisted of anyone in France that was not a noble and not a member of the clergy (administrators of the Roman Catholic Church). However, Robespierre earned a law degree from the Parisian Lycee (School) Louis-le-Grand, proving that he was a member of the highest class of the Third Estate.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Robespierre and the Terror” by Marisa Linton, Maximilien Robespierre is foremost depicted as a heartless monster that terrorized the people of France during the 1790’s. The article states facts about Robespierre starting with his birth in 1758, his “Reign of Terror” and ultimately ends with his death by beheading. Though Robespierre was an active revolutionary that represent common people, his radical ideas and hofficic actions inevitably scarred France’s history so he will forever be an infamous figure. Towards the end of the article, however, Linton sheds light on the idea that one person, by themselves, is not capable of this destruction; rather the people in their entirety are to blame. Instead of accepting the anarchy they…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays