Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Max Weber

Satisfactory Essays
474 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Max Weber
Weber was one of the early 20th century writers who was 'arguing with the ghost of Marx'

There are four major themes in his study of society

1. Religion and Class as the key dynamic factors that influence society.
He agreed with Marx that 'class' as 'political economic power' was a major factor in the historical development of 'modern society' However he disagreed that 'class' was the only institution that dominated the development of modern society. Weber believed that cultural factors, especially religion, were also important. However, Weber didn't argue that religion was the cause of Capitalism but that Protestantantism and Capitalism fitted together and developed in interaction with each other. So he did NOT argue that religion 'created' capitalism.

2.Class and Inequality:Class, Status and Power
2.1 Whilst he also agreed with Marx that ownership of capital or labour separated the two major classes of society, he also argued that social inequality in modern society was more complicated than this.
2.2 He argues that differences in the amount of social power, or STATUS differences (that is the amount of admiration or respect we have) are also important aspects of inequality in modern societies..
2.3 He argues with Marx too about political power. Weber believed that modern society was dominated, not only by owners of capital, but also by those with political power. He includes here elected politicians but also (and especially) people who have bureaucratic power. He sees bureaucracy as the major of basis of power in modern society.

3.Bureaucracy. and Rationality
He argued that modern society is distinguished from pre modernism by the way we think, feel and operate in the world. For Weber the key contrast is that we privilege rational thiinking above traditional thinking. Bureacracies are the most important social institutions creating and perpetuating modern society because they are predominantly based on rationality. 'what works most efficiently' not 'how did our fathers do it' is the major guide for modern organisations. - in education, health, politics, and business.

4. The importance of 'meaning' and 'action'
Sociologists should study not just the objective aspects of society ie. 'what we do'. but should address the meaning of behaviour...'why we act. He puts 'behaviour' and 'meaning' together in his concept of 'Action Research'

In conclusion. Weber argues that 'Rationalism' rather than 'Capitalism' is the key to interpreting modernity. However he sees both advantages and disadvantages in Rational Modern societies.

Modernity creates greater efficiency, wealth and justice, but modern people, he said, are also at risk of becoming: dehumanised., becoming ......

'Specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart'
Source(s):
There are lots of general social theory texts around and books specifically about Max Weber. I generally use British or Australian texts but a good, easy-to-understand US one is by Cuzzort and King called 'Twentieth Century Social Thought'.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Weber became a Law Lecturer at the University of Berlin in 1891 and in his early writings he did a work on Roman Agrarian History. It is observed through his work that he was a man who was affected by his spiritual and mental health at the time of writing his work. This can be clearly seen in 1897, which was a fatal point in his life, as he suffered by a nervous breakdown, following his father’s death. It took him about 5 years to recover from it. When he recovered he started writing with much eagerness and on 1904-1905 he issued his most popular piece of work that was named “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” (PSCE). They were two articles that caused great controversy and they demonstrate the relationship between Protestantism and economic ethics of the modern capitalist environment during the 17th century.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in Australia

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Weber: Believed class position > determined by person's skills/education rather than by their relationship to means of production. Marx & Weber agreed social stratification was undesirable, however where Marx believed stratification would disappear along with capitalism/private property. Weber believe solution lay in providing "equal opportunity" within competitive/capitalist system…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Max Weber disagreed with Marx’s claim that economics is the central force in social change.Weber believed that religion was the central force of social change. His conclusion came from him contrasting the Roman Catholic and Protestant belief systems. “Roman Catholics, he said, were taught that because they were members of the only true church, they were on the road to heaven. This made them comfortable with traditional ways of life.” (Henslin, pg. 8). While Roman Catholics followed their system, protestants undermined the spiritual security of its followers and motivated them to embrace change. Protestants that were under the Calvinist tradition didn’t even know if they were saved until…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classic sociologist Max Weber was strongly influenced by Marx's ideas, but rejected the possibility of effective communism, arguing that it would require an even greater level of detrimental social control and bureaucratization than capitalist society. Weber developed the three-component theory of stratification and the concept of life chances. Weber supposed there were more class divisions than Marx suggested, taking different concepts from both functionalist and Marxist theories to create his own system. Weber claimed there are four main classes: the upper class, the white-collar workers, the petite bourgeoisie, and the manual working class. Weber's theory more closely resembles theories of modern Western class structures embraced by sociologists, although economic status does not seem to depend strictly on earnings in the way Weber envisioned.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His discussion of the spirit of capitalism relies extremely heavily on the writings of Benjamin Franklin. Weber's characterizations have indeed been attacked by some, and he has been criticized for not relying on more quantitative surveys. This section also suggests that Weber's attitude toward the modern capitalistic system is undecided. He talks of an "iron cage" to describe the situation of individuals in the modern world (Weber 5). They are trapped in a larger system of institutions and values that define their opportunities in life. While capitalism needed ascetic Protestantism in order to become powerful, once it gained that power it took on a life of its…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third theory is the Bureaucratic theory. Max Weber who is credited for the theory believed that Marx had ignored the social and political fact of modern times. He had the idea that the large government agencies and other bureaucracies were the true starters and holders of political power.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also had influences that shaped the way in he thought of and saw the world one of them being Marx because he always found ways to either agree or disagree with Marx’s theories, an instance of this is when both theorists are arguing about class. Similar to Marx, Weber saw class as economically determined. He believed society was split between owners and laborers. Status, on the other hand, was based on noneconomic factors such as education, connection, and religion. Both status and class determined an individual’s power, or influence over concepts. Unlike Marx, Weber thought that these individuals understanding of one another and the world they formed the base of a stable society. For weber a rational society is one built around logic and efficiency rather than morality or tradition. To Weber, capitalism is entirely rational. Although this leads to productivity and merit-based success, it can have adverse effects when taken to the extreme. Weber was also unlike his predecessors was more interested in how individuals experienced societal divisions than in the…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article presents Weber’s argument regarding social stratification in contrast to Marx’s. In his discussion of his theory of social stratification, he outlines three ways in which society is divided: by class (economically), status (socially) and by party (ideologically). He argues that the individual identity is not determined by the class identity, and that status and party identities often cross class divisions.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical sensitivity is essential as sociology is focused upon the mechanisms of change and the discipline's scope extends to societies of the past and future. Max Weber's work in explaining the nature of authority both in our own and other societies would have been difficult without…

    • 1888 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology 100

    • 3219 Words
    • 13 Pages

    * Economy- economic analysis: fundamental difference is that class, status and power according to Weber is far more complex than how Marx sees the world. Status means that people could be respected even before wealth.…

    • 3219 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Vs Weber

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The analysis of capitalism allows a researcher to learn a great deal about the different ideologies from countless sources based on experiences though time in many different countries. Two great theorists Karl Marx and Max Weber both have a scope on capitalism and what perpetuates it through which their own experiences and ideas appear. The ideology of capitalism between these two caries within it certain similarities, but while Marx strongly opposed capitalism and expected a revolution, Weber establishes a different look into structure and saw a better system where to perpetuate bureaucracy and capitalism are the pillar of efficiency.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx Research Paper

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    many of Marx’s beliefs have come to pass. The idea of two economic classes competing for…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health and Social Class

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Weber’s writings show that there are other aspects apart from class and how they strongly influence people’s lives and this allowed a more flexible basis than Marx provided in order to analyse stratification.…

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics