Preview

Mass Uprising Defeats CIA Coup in Venezuela

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mass Uprising Defeats CIA Coup in Venezuela
MASS UPRISING DEFEATS CIA COUP IN VENEZUELA
By Andy McInerney
The revolutionary process underway in Venezuela passed a decisive test over the weekend of April 13-14. Hundreds of thousands of workers and peasants across the country rose up to defeat a U.S.-backed coup attempt organized by the Venezuelan capitalist class against President Hugo Chávez.
It was a genuine victory of people's power in the first open clash of social classes in the oil-rich South American country. But the victory also lays bare the fundamental question of the Venezuelan Revolution: how to organize the popular classes--the workers, peasants, soldiers and students--to defend the revolution against further assaults by the propertied oligarchy and the weight of U.S. imperialism.
The Venezuelan Revolution, a process that opened with Chávez's election in 1998, is at a decisive crossroads. Its progress will require the international solidarity of all progressive people, especially in the United States.
CHÁVEZ AND THE "BOLIVARIAN REVOLUTION"
Venezuela is a mineral-rich South American country bordering the Caribbean Sea. It is the third-largest exporter of oil to the United States--down from the largest when Chávez was elected in 1998.
But the tremendous wealth that the oil industry generates has never impacted the lives of Venezuela's working class. More than 80 percent live in poverty. One percent of the population owns 60 percent of the arable land.
The tremendous social inequities have caused tremendous explosions of popular outrage. In 1989, the ruling class unleashed a military assault on tens of thousands of people demanding lower food prices; more than 3,000 were massacred.
In 1992, junior military officers led by Lt. Col. Hugo Chávez staged a coup attempt in solidarity with huge demonstrations against International Monetary Fund-dictated austerity measures.
After spending two years in prison, Chávez toured the country, advocating what he described as a "Bolivarian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gran Colombia also had parts of present day Brazil and Peru. Bolivar then went on to fully liberate Peru, and was then made dictator of said country.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Their ways met in Ecuador, where the unassuming and giving San Martín fell off second best. While he is respected in Argentina as a national legend, in South America everywhere Bolivar is adored just about as a divine being.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    exposed this topic to people by using pathos in his writing to appeal to a massive crowd and build his argument against violence. Chavez used experiences in his writing that nearly the entire population could relate to, death and self freedom.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flsa Analysis

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to improve their living conditions, the proletariat of the capitalist countries fought a long battle against the…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both scenarios vehemently loathe capitalism; the idea of one profiting independently with very limited interference from the government. Venezuela, a de facto Socialist nation, plainly supports the idea of the government providing numerous necessities to its citizens. Therefore, little government action in businesses is a hinderance. In Anthem, it is a similar situation; based on collectivism, society determined the occupation of citizens. These jobs consisted of products beneficial to everyone in the society, and any object not accepted by all is blasphemy. Also, both governments are in denial that their policies will bring them forward, and those who think discretely are vacuous. When in fact, these administrations’ laws are stagnating society and the citizens themselves. These leaders are essentially assuming their roles as dictators; as a result, they have the authority to enact any laws, whether they are progressive or stagnant. With this greater influence, they perceive themselves as intelligent and the right leader for the civilization; as opposed to the people themselves. It is quite evident that Venezuela and Anthem possess leaders meeting these criterias. In Venezuela, President Maduro used his power to obstruct opposition claiming his laws are ineffective and actually destructive. Also, when criticized, President Maduro made numerous excuses, stating that the administration is not the source of the issue. One country being the main target of threats: the United States of coup attempts and oil conflicts. As for Anthem, the citizens basically are unintelligent from birth. With the society brainwashing generations of their people, it resulted in people stalling in development and knowledge. Only those who “shine” in the eyes of the council will flourish in their collective civilization. Also, when Equality presented the council with electricity, they referred to the…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causes of the Venezuelan Revolution included that the Venezuelans did not want to pay the taxes imposed upon them by the French, they were opposed to Napoleon's rule in Spain, they didn't approve of the social ladder. The social ladder placed the French at the top and the Venezuelan people at the very…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unfortunately, with the inclusion of Venezuela I believe did a disservice to themselves and weakened the films argument. The lack of substance and history of why President Hugo Chavez’s administration and government consolidated power is a crucial foundation needed to be discussed in understanding contemporary Venezuela. Ignoring and neglecting the failed coup d’état in 2002 by a select individuals in the military and economic elites – funded by the United State through the National Endowment for Democracy and U.S. Aid according to the Council on Hemispheric Affairs – that lead to his removal for a few day only to be returned to power by mass citizen mobilization in the streets throughout Venezuela is vital. The fact that the hegemonic world leader would attempt to ouster President Chavez granted him rationale in many individual’s eyes for centralizing power. Totally absent from the film was this critical foundation in understanding the actions taken by then President Chavez. While the filmmakers had every right to criticize the consolidation of power by the executive branch in Venezuela the deficiency of cause for the consolidation diluted the stories legitimacy as a whole. Furthermore, many of the examples given in the film for lack of democratic government in Venezuela did not seem to be principal barriers to democracy. The lack of…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * In mid June, men working on government projects rebelled. They demanded higher pay, or else they would join the rebellion force. This revolt was crushed by the government. Their leaders were also arrested.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let Me Speak Analysis

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The military controlled Bolivia so that the people “can’t unite and form a common front” to easily manipulate individuals in believing that the people should be content about what they have because there are people who suffers even more. The reason behind the repressiveness of capitalism is that it requires individualism so that the government can exploit the people easily. Capitalism is hegemonic but has dominance over the people because of its militarized government. Chungara talks about various events where the militant rummaged their houses and disrupts the peace in Siglo XX. She talks about the time when their union leaders were “ambushed taken prisoner” because the government found out about a union assembly that is about to take place (Chungara and Viezzer, 80). Chungara also talks about the San Juan massacre that occurred on June 27, 1967 “because the government found out that there was going to be a plenary meeting of all the secretaries-general” and “the government didn’t want it to take place” (Chungara and Viezzer, 116). The San Juan massacre proves that the government does not value the human capital as well because they mercilessly kill innocent people just to prevent them from organizing and takes away their right to a better life. Although the people only want better living conditions, the government did not care enough to allow them to have a freedom to speak up about their needs. The MNR is also too greedy to spend their wealth on the people so they leave them in scarcity. Domitila is against capitalism because of its manipulative and violent…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism was sweeping across Latin America during the 20th century and acted as a stand to Capitalism and the United States. According to John Chasteen, a professor of history at the University of North Carolina, says this about Latin Americans adopting Marxist-ideas, “to adopt Marxism meant basically one thing: to side with the weal and impoverished masses against the rich minority and the US multinational corporations.” Latin America was fully influenced by imperialism and their society was shaped by imperialism especially by the United States. Vladimir Lenin was the one who realized that, “capitalism had reached a state unforeseen by Marx, the stage of imperialism.” Lenin recognized that imperial capitalists, “had seized much of the “backward” world from which they [the capitalists] extracted “super profits.”” Therefore, Latin Americans were primarily concerned with ridding themselves of the imperial powers that plagued their lands since the Spanish colonial times. Latin America used Leninism-Marxism as a way of escaping their imperial past and as a way for continuing into the future. This paper will attempt to rationalize Leninism-Marxism as it developed in Cuba and Argentina, it will look towards autonomism as an alternative to Capitalism and Marxism, and it will acknowledge the US and how their views of Marxism skewed their actions in Latin America, especially in Cuba.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Castro’s revolt in Cuba was the ultimate eruption of Cuba’s history of U.S influence and control and “crystallized dissatisfaction with the status quo” (Brands 25). Consequently, Castro’s spread of the “foco” was partially a response to the anti-imperialism and “yankeephobia” that characterized Catro’s public discourse. The ideals that pervaded Cuba rapidly spread to Cuba’s neighboring countries, eventually making of Cuba an example for Latin America: “we Costa Rican campesinos also want a Revolution like Cuba’s”. (Brands 25) Castro and Guevara’s visits to Latin American universities in 1959 and 1960 also resulted in a successful spread of the revolution amongst the rising student class, influencing university students in both Argentina and Mexico. Cuba’s revolution also played a crucial role in fractioning regional politics of several countries including Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. Whilst both right and left parties were present in such countries, political parties in decline or marginalized by the main local ideologies were now tempted by the uprising “foco” that Cuba was promoting. (Brands…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | *Caballero’s rule weakened because Republicans were politically divided due to different ideologies; communists vs. socialists who believed revolution should be postponed, anarchists who believed war could only be won through revolutionary policies. *Terror tactics to control increasing population led to resistance*’May Days” street fighting: communists and socialists vs. anarchists enhanced disunity…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I am convinced that the truest act of courage, the strongest act of manliness, is to sacrifice ourselves for others in a totally nonviolent struggle for justice. To be a man is to suffer for others. God help us to be men.” Chavez believed that the best way to protest is to do it nonviolently. He was willing to sacrifice himself and went on a 25-day hunger…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many believe that children in their infancy are supposed to be concern about their own small problems. They are not supposed to worry about politics or other grown up matters. Venezuelan children are the exception to that belief. I am a Venezuelan who grew up knowing and caring about my country’s politics. I was always aware of all the scandals and new ideas the president was part of. How could I not be? My mother, who worked in Venezuela’s biggest oil industry, was one of the many he fired on live TV. I was only five at the time, but I was very much aware of all the pain and distress he caused in my whole family. Slowly, as I grew up, I started paying more and more attention to the strange character Hugo Chavez was. The way of his speech,…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay deals with one of the most fascinating subjects in social and political sciences – revolutions – and focuses specifically on the causes of these dramatic episodes in human society. John Dunn (1989) believes that the questions of what causes revolutions to occur and what revolutions mean cannot be separated from one another. Hence, before addressing their causes, it is necessary to first clarify the meaning of revolutions. In this essay, instead of formulating a new scholarly definition of ‘revolution’, I will use this term to refer to the large-scale movements which lead to changes in power relations on both the political and social levels, i.e. political revolutions and social revolutions.…

    • 5649 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics