Preview

Marx Durkheim Weber

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx Durkheim Weber
6. Critically examine the specific methods used by Marx, Durkheim, Weber for the analysis of social forces and relations in modern society.

Defining the concept of social forces and relations in modern society without assuming them as a derivatives of other sciences such as politics, philosophy, religion conclude us with the examination of them as the core foundation of classical sociological theory. Thus we will encounter with Durkeim, Marx and Weber’s conceptualization of social forces and relations in modern society.

The idea of totality is the common feature of the classical sociological theory even the philosophical backgrounds of Durkeim, Marx and Weber’s perspectives are differ from each other. Before, we must know that the main point of the totality is analyzing the total itself rather than looking at its parts, thus society itself becomes the central point of the analysis. If we develop a scheme that will focus on the key variables in analysis of Durkheim, Marx and Weber, these variables come out as psychology, nature and the religion. In the analysis of the society there are three fundamental variables: psychology, nature and religion that Durkheim, Marx and Weber emphasized respectively. Durkheim use psychology as basic assumption of his analysis, Marx use the nature and Weber use religion.

Durkheim is an important person for sociology because of his effort to establish sociology as a discipline distinct from philosophy and psychology. This effort is evident in the two main themes that permeate Durkheim 's work: the priority of the social over the individual and the idea that society can be studied scientifically. Durkheim 's concept of social facts, in particular, differentiates sociology from philosophy and psychology. Social facts are the social structures and cultural norms and values that are external to, and coercive over, individuals. Social facts are not attached to any particular individual; nor are they reducible to individual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociological theories give us different ways to look at our societies. Sociological perspectives are used as a way of looking at human behaviour and how it has an effect on the society in which we live. They are used to interpret and provide sociological explanations for how individuals act and how it affects society as a whole. The “science of society” was developed by Auguste Compte in the 19th century. However, not all sociologists share the same ideas. This assignment will be considering two sociological perspectives in detail and comparing a third. The perspectives being considered are Marxism, functionalism, which took a macro view of society, and interactionism, which took a micro view on society. and the areas being considered are…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    socio;ogy notes

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Identify and critique the sociological contributions of the following mid-to-late nineteenth and early twentieth century European thinkers: Auguste Comte, Herbert Spencer, Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This question is relevant today because the same concept of society and the relationship between the individuals within it is still something that is constantly being dealt with and thought about. Durkheims philosophy is a key staple in modern sociology because this relationship is still pertinent. The role of the individuals on society is still key because it seems that society is shaping people rather than people…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The approach that best describes Weber’s work in the study of sociology is the interpretive sociology. This method is based on people’s understandings…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim are widely recognized as the trinity of sociological theory. While these three sociologists were trailblazing social theorists who enhanced the study of human behavior and its relationship to social institutions, other, more contemporary scholars were just as innovative - one of those scholars being W. E. B. Du Bois.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each theorist comes from a different society, a different viewpoint and a different upbringing. Writers, such as Martineau, Rousseau and Maistre “provided the intellectual context for theorizing about new forms of social life and society that came to prevail first in Britain and subsequently worldwide” (Bratton and Denham, 2009:2). Similarly, “Durkheim’s sociology generates an interest in social regulation,” developed in relation to societal norms and values, which were present at the time (Bratton and Denham, 2009:20). But, it is important to recognize that not all theorists are recognized. Sometimes, we only become aware of certain views, due to the bias of the society. The theories that come to light are views that are generally related to greater societal views. Founding theorists are a “product of our constructions, the result of the translations of selected classic authors largely undertaken by white, male Anglo-Saxon scholars” (Bratton and Denham, 2009:4). This shows that ideas generated in a time period are based upon the surroundings and then selected based on a bias of what is generally acceptable for that societal…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociologists today employ three primary theoretical perspectives: the symbolic interactionist perspective, the functionalist perspective, and the conflict perspective.[2] Symbolic interactionist are mainly focused on the details. They study the symbols of society, and to them socialization is extremely important.[1] According to the symbolic interactionist perspective people often attach meaning to symbols, and then they act according to their subjective interpretation of these symbols. Though many other theorist say that symbolic neglects the macro level of social interpretation, “the big picture” [2] Functionalist perspective is an entire view through a macro view of the relationship between the parts of society; How aspects of society are functional (adaptive). They also believe that society is held together by social consensus, or cohesion, in which members of the society agree upon, and work together to achieve, whit is best for the society.[2] Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton based their work of Emile Durkheim, and all three emphasize the how structures contribute to the orderliness and stability.[1] Two of the main contributors to the conflict theory are Max weber and Karl Marx. They wrote that there will inevitably be a struggle between the powerful and the powerless. Characterized by its struggle of inequality. [1] The conflict perspective focuses on the negative, conflicted, and ever-changing nature of society. Conflict theorist challenge the status quo, encourage social change, and believe rich and powerful people force social order on the poor and weak.[2] These perspectives offer sociologists theoretical paradigms for explaining how society influences people, and vice versa. Each perspective uniquely conceptualizes society, social forces, and human behavior. [2]…

    • 318 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sociology and Emile Durkheim

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are founding fathers of sociology and outstanding sociologists who made great contributions to the development of sociology and progress of human beings. Previous studies have been done about the theories and methods of Durkheim and Weber, and their works have also been studied for many times from different viewpoints, such as the nature of human and social world, their mutual unawareness of each other and so on. However, few studies have been done to compare and contrast their thoughts and methodologies on social behavior. This essay examines Durkheim’ and Weber’s theories and methods regarding social behavior and discusses the similarities and differences between them. In the first part of this essay, Durkheim’s theory of social behavior-social facts, which is independently of individuals and have coercive power-will be presented and then the method he used-statistics and comparison--will be discussed. The second part of this work will analyze Weber’s theory of social behavior-social action, action which is directed to another human beings-and then the method-verstehen, which involves the interpretive understanding of social action-and tool-Ideal Types, imagined by scientist to compare social phenomena-will be presented clearly. Further more, I will move on to the major part of this essay, in this part, similarities such as that they both use comparison in their research, and difference between Durkheim’s and Weber’s theories and methods on social behavior such as their attitudes towards individuals, will be proposed from different aspects and perspectives respectively.…

    • 2633 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Durkheim, E. (1982) _Durkheim: The Rules of Sociological Method_, ed. S. Lukes, (London: Macmillan).…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology Quotes

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Durkheim, E. (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan. (Originally published in French in 1895).…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although, August Comte brought to light the inherent capacities of a societal science it was Emile Durkheim, through dogged effort, which raised Comte’s theory to the level of a science. What Durkheim desired to impart on the science of sociology was respect for it, as a science and that would stand alone as its own scientific method. This drive to make the sociological method a science stems from a desire to show that the ethical study of social and cultural behavior could produce…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dualism of Human Nature

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In DHN, Durkheim argues that sociology must examine what an individual consists of because it is a result of the whole society. It is this society which determines an individuals’ temperament or being. “Although sociology is defined as the science of societies, it cannot, in reality, deal with the human groups that are the immediate object of its investigation without eventually touching on the individual who is the basic element of which these groups are composed” (p.1)…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The conflict perspective views society less as a cohesive system and more as an arena of conflict and power struggles”. This perspective was founded by sociologist Karl Marx (1818-1883) and serves to introduce the concept that “inequality and specifically inequality under capitalism” exists between two main “classes” in society namely the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The functionalist perspective – another major sociological theory – was founded by Auguste Comte (1798-1857) and also includes contributions by Herbert Spencer (1820-1913) and Emile Durkheim (1858-1917). Durkheim is considered the main exponent of the functionalist perspective building on the ideas of Comte and Spencer and succeeding in entrenching the view of society as a system (according to Course Material – Introduction to Sociology pg.66). Functionalists see society as comprising distinct but interconnected parts that function together as one entity. The main view of the functionalist perspective is that society is held together by “Value Consensus” posited by Talcott Parsons (1902-1979), which suggests that, “there is a basic agreement about values which in turn work to serve the interest of the society as a whole and this achieved through the socialisation process” (according to Course Material – Introduction to Sociology pg 68). The main assumption of the conflict perspective sees human beings as selfish and self preserving that is, in constant struggle or conflict with others to maintain control and maintain control of power and resources in society. Although the functionalist and the conflict theories share the fact that social change is inevitable it is the relevance of the society and the influence it has that is the main difference between the two.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociology is the study of social behaviour. Our behaviour is patterned in certain ways and sociologists study these patterns and differences in a scientific manner. The study of modern sociology, the objective and systematic study of human behaviour and society, only began from the late 1700s onwards (Giddens, 1989, 1993, 1997, 2001). The origins of this science can be linked to the two great revolutions that occurred in Europe in the eighteenth and nineteenth century – The French Revolution of 1789 and the Industrial Revolution in the late eighteenth century. These revolutions greatly changed people's values and ideas about society and the part they had to play in it. The early sociologists, who lived during these times of great social and economic change, put forward theories and approaches to try and make sense of the changing society around them and the consequences these changes would have. In this essay I will refer to the main founding fathers of sociology: Comte, Durkheim, Marx and Weber. I will discuss their main ideas and concerns about the changing societies that they encountered.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics