Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Martial Law

Good Essays
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Martial Law
What started the martial law?

It all started from bombing in Plaza Miranda. The 1971 Plaza Miranda bombing occurred during a political campaign rally of the Liberal Party at Plaza Miranda in the district of Quiapo, Manila on August 21, 1971. It caused nine deaths and injured 95 others. The injured Party's campaign rally was held to proclaim the candidacies of eight Senatorial bets as well as the candidate for the Mayoralty race in Manila. As a crowd of about 4,000 gathered to hear speeches. Two hand grenades were reportedly tossed on stage. Among those killed instantly were a 5 year old child and The Manila Times photographer Ben Roxas. Almost everyone on stage was injured, including incumbent Senator Jovito Salonga (Liberal Party), President Gerardo Roxas and Sergio Osmeña, Jr., (son of former President of the Commonwealth of the Philippines, Sergio Osmeña).
The election was cancelled because of the bombing in plaza Miranda. Which made President Ferdinand Marcos to declare Martial Law and continue to rule Philippines.

The Martial Law

By definition, Martial Law is the temporary superimposition of military government over civil government. This military-run government is put into place in the event of war or serious national emergencies. During such times, the military and its accompanying superiors take over the executive, legislative and judicial functions normally delegated to the civil government by virtue of its constitution. As a consequence, the writhabeas corpus, or the right of an individual in custody to be brought to court to determine whether such incarceration or imprisonment is lawful, may be suspended indefinitely. This suspension of individual rights denies the person due process of law.

My Reflection:

When we speak of Martial Law, the first thing that comes to our mind is the former President who installed it, Ferdinand Edralin Marcos. In truth, we blame this person for the failure that was martial law. Still, there are some who stand steadfast in defending martial law as the best thing that ever happened to the country.

It's been 41 years since former president and dictator Ferdinand Marcos signed Proclamation No. 1081, placing the entire Philippines under Martial Law. According to my reading and understanding, he did it to save the Republic and to create what he called a "New Society. In other words, Martial Law is the ultimate solution to curves growing problems in criminality. For me, Martial Law wasn't the best thing in the world that happened to the Philippines. Martial Law during the time of Marcos wasn't declared to restore peace and order. Nor was it declared to do good for the country. Money and power is the only thing that can be heard. Nobody can be respected! Marcos used several events to justify Martial Law.

I also disagree that Martial Law was ultimate solution to curve growing problems on criminality. There is criminality due to poverty. And it just seems that crimes could be minimized if not eradicated or being eliminated during Martial Law because there is no press freedom, no due process, and etc. It may not solved poverty but yes, it does “minimized” criminality. The only problem of having Martial Law was the people in authority are the ones abuse their power to implement the rules of law. Whether we have or we don't have Martial Law, the corruptions will remains and the poverty will keep growing because the population keeps booming. Some people say that Martial Law was imposed for the good of the Marcoses and their cronies, just to keep them in wealth. Cronies started to get richer and richer. What the cronies want, the cronies get. Imagine what more the case of what Imelda wants, Imelda gets. And the military started it’s countless cases of human rights abuses, military cruelty and oppression was at its finest hours.

Martial Law that time was like this, anybody could be picked up at anytime for any reason by the military or the police. If you protested against the government, you were labeled as "communist" and you were summarily arrested. People that time was afraid to speak out. There are lots of people who suffered human rights violations that saw thousands of life damaged, destroyed, or lost. Some of them were the victims of salvaging. (Filipinos who just disappeared from the face of the earth). With Martial Law, those hardheaded people that doesn't want to follow the rules of law will hide themselves and only those in the military has a power to do what ever they want. Coming up with the idea of every Filipinos who will join the military in order for them to have a safety net incase there well be war among them. It seems so funny, but that's the reality.

For me, the advantages of Martial Law during Marcos time is the people were disciplined when he declared Martial, less car accidents at night because of the curfew, there was law and order during the martial law,

Disadvantages, is the death of democracy. Marcos used several events to justify Martial Law. The declaration had made people be mute for a moment. Suspended the civil rights and imposed military authority in the country. There is no freedom of the press. The rights of the people to speak and share their opinion in that current situation was totally denied and deprived. Stronger military power, which cause harm to the civilians. Tens of thousands were arrested and imprisoned without court charges, thousands were tortured and hundreds summarily executed. What with everybody scared that complaining to the courts would not do anything to help. People were dying and justice is nowhere to be found.disappear. Disregarded all rights of the people. Life itself has no value during the Martial Law, people started to be missing, missing people turning up dead. Institutions and businesses that are owned by oppositions are confiscated, no matter how many generations of the same families have owned them.

But the spirit of justice had been awakened in the Filipino people once more. Like their forefathers or ancestors before them who rallied against the tyranny of the Spanish rulers, the people united in a common cause. Once again, the Filipino people united against insurmountable odds to overthrow the dictator Marcos. The revolution had been realized. The power of the Filipinos is not in physical form, it is a binding spirit which unites them for a common cause.

My generalization, as the time goes by, Martial Law remains a permanent scar in our collective consciousness as a people. Martial Law? It will never do good for this country. I say it because the Philippines cannot have a leader without selfish people around with selfish interest at the back of their minds . Yes, we can probably say that the leader may have good intentions, but the people around him, his relatives, his friends, his cronies may have other interests in mind.
If martial law is declared right now, I do not believe the country can do anything to prevent it, much less oppose it! But i am sure Filipinos will not live everyday living a life run by a dictator.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In times of war, laws are silent. Throughout every war there are legal issues that are brought to the table. These issues decide the fate of our country. The government must act fast to protect its citizens. Inter arma silent leges may seem unconstitutional but we deem it necessary because in the end, it comes to our benefit. Laws should be silent in times of war because it saved our union from falling apart, it allowed America to receive vital information, and allowed the united nations to win World War Two.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlawful Arrest

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This study will examine the shift in its implementation in the United States from 1863-2015. And how its change has conspired against civilian life. People have failed to recognize how its declaration can affect civilization, leading to the increase in unlawful detainment of citizens and non-citizens. Yet even so has made considerable contributions to settle disputes. Its regime has reconstructed the use of authority in society in addition alleviate complications in time of distress. Its implication can be based off existing exploitations and can undergo a change at any time. If we continue to believe that martial law efforts only improve social functions, we’ll never fully understand the larger question of how it its declaration has impacted the rise in an unlawful arrest of citizens in the United states from…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During times of war the role of the president’s is responsible for martial law. The military plays a role in the martial law because it is too make sure everything is governed correctly. Habeas Corpus is established so that a person can know what their charge is. However, if the defendant claim is denied the Supreme Court will take control over the trial. The United States has being the target of several terror attacks. Habeas corpus is an important civil right that should be given to those accused of committing acts of terror.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benigno Aquino, Jr.

    • 3586 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Benigno Simeon "Ninoy" Aquino, Jr.[2][3][4][5] (November 27, 1932 – August 21, 1983), was a Filipino Senator and a former Governor of Tarlac. Aquino, together with Gerry Roxas and Jovito Salonga, formed the leadership of the opposition to the government of President Ferdinand Marcos. Shortly after the imposition of Martial Law, he was arrested in 1973 along with other dissidents and incarcerated for seven years. Aquino was permitted to travel to the United States for medical treatment following a heart attack. He was assassinated at the Manila International Airport in…

    • 3586 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -Discovery of katipunan (Aug. 19,1892)-Dr. Jose Rizal was killed by the Spaniards in bagong bayan or luneta park (December 30, 1898)-Philippine Independence (June 12, 1898)-death of President of Ramon Magsaysay (March 17, 1957)-The assassination of Senator Ninoy Aquino (August 21, 1983)-Proclamation of Martial Law by President Marcos on September 21, 1972…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything started from on 1st October 1965, at 03.30 am, a rebel group which was called PKI did rebellion movement. This group was led by Letnan. Kolonel. Untung. They kidnapped Letnan. General. Ahmad Yani, General. D. I. Pandjaitan, Mayor. General. Soetoyo, Mayor. General. Soeprapto, Brigadir. General. S. Parman, and Mayor. General. M. T. Haryono. They were the leaders of the army. There was no reason to be really appropriate and valid why they were killed. Furthermore, the generals were kidnapped and killed to be called as Heroes of the Revolution.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a documentary I watched Garcia (1997). He said that 1969, elections came around when Marcos run for his second term, and that was the dirtiest, fraudulent ever. When that election came rise in dollar out bared. That was the most expensive election. On 1971 after the Plaza Bombing, Filipinos don’t have trust, due to disappointment to Marcos. Marcos opponents in that election won that’s Liberal party in which people who became the victim of Plaza Bombing. On 1972 all of the people contradict to Marcos or his enemies were arrested by police and the military. Including Benigno Aquino became his mortal enemy. Many people arrested. Nobody knows what is happening because all of the media controlled by Marcos all you can hear is just music. The government set Plebiscite to produced new constitution but soon he realized that he might lost because all people are in favor for Benigno and Diokno so he changed it to voting through raising hands, even kids were allowed to vote and then they will going to ask, who wants free food, because of poverty many people will raised they’re hands. Marcos did consult to Richard Nixon about his…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In EDSA I people were protesting about an election fraud supposedly done by Ferdinand Marcos during February 1986. EDSA I lasted five days from February 21-25 1986. Many of Corazon Aquino’s devoted followers were angered because they were not able to vote due to the fact that their names were deleted from the registered voter’s list. Members of the Commission on Election left work because they were offended that Ferdinand Marcos was demanding that he should be the winner. After Ferdinand Marcos left his position, he went to Hawaii.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy vs. Martial Law

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first leader, who established the first Martial law regime was Governor-General Ramon Blanco, next was General Emilio Aguinaldo, then Former President Jose P. Laurel and last was one of the known dictators of the Philippines, Former President Ferdinand Marcos. He justified that it is because of the large threats of communist and Muslim rebels unto the country. Once in effect, it covered the entire republic on September 21, 1972. It was announced to the public two days later. The GNP of the country on that regime, increased at $11.5 billion by 1980. From the declaration of Martial law, the US President gave $2.5 billion for economic aid and bilateral military of the country. Everyone has a curfew on that time. Everyone shouldn’t be caught outside their residences from 12 o’clock midnight to 4 o’clock early morning. Or else, the cops will put you in jail, but will release you the next day. Depends on how heavy your mistake is. Marcos was very strict in that time. He started increasing the rates and prices in the market. Even the smallest mistake can lead you to a punishment. But the crimes lessen because…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People Power Revolution

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "People Power" redirects here. For current and former political parties, see People Power Party (disambiguation).…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orapronobis

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the story, it was Marcos’ regime when the foreign priest was shot by the so-called orapronobis just because of complaining on what they are doing. At the time martial law ended, our country became democratic and people were non-violent with the lead of Corazon Aquino. That is what everyone thought. But the film just showed me that it is not. It is just orapronobis had been considered vigilantes so the church and the government do not really interfere with their laws and acts even they still kill innocent people. Innocent or rebel, it is still not right to just arrest someone without any proof who they really are as a citizen. Many families had suffered for the loss of a relative especially Jimmy who had been an ex-priest, ex-rebel and advocate for Human Rights, whom his ex-girlfriend back then together with his son got inhumanely killed by Commander Kontra.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the aftermath of the 1986 revolution that dismantled the Marcos regime and led to the nullification of the 1973 Constitution, a new constitution was drafted and ratified. The 1987 Constitution provides in Article III, Section 19 (1) that:…

    • 8765 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martial Law

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, during Marcos’ second term, Martial Law was born. This fateful event marks that start of a change in Philippine History, and has therefore affected the lives of many Filipinos. This also exhibits the greed and want of Marcos for power and control over the country. When someone says Martial Law, the first thing that comes to most people’s minds is the unceasing violence. Activists and protesters were captured and tortured to death. Violence was all around the country during that time. Anyone who seeks to bring down the legitimate power of Marcos was either captured, tortured or sentenced to death. It could even be done all at the same time. The Martial Law clearly and obviously violates the right of the people to life and liberty. Surging events such as the Plaza Miranda Bombing, and Ninoy Aquino’s death were reported under the rule of Martial Law. During this time, the military has the control. Civilian supremacy was under the military.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even after the martial law, social movements still existed because the basic issues remained ignored by the state. Post-Martial Law period was a transition between the authoritarianism to democracy. Therefore, they are challenged to find ways on how to take advantage of the resources available under the new political dispensation. The three dominant social movements in this era are the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), New People’s Army (NPA) and National Democratic Front (NDF). There came a coalition between these three and with other organizations to have a greater force because according to Morales, “no single organization could win power legally and govern effectively alone and for itself.” CPP-NPA-NDF continues to be part of social movements that are influenced by the concept of revolution. They wanted to sweep away the current social and political institutions in order to attain the desired development. In order to address this, they identify the political opportunity structures and other strategies which could help them in the pursuit of democratization. First, was creating a broad coalition front based on the people’s concerns. It was an easier way to gain support from the people who are the ones that are greatly affected with the issues like sudden increase on prices of basic commodities. These are the peasants, workers and the urban poor. Second is through electoral politics. This was given impetus by the party-list system which allotted the maximum of three seats in the House of Representatives. It was a strategy to intervene in the decision-making of the government. These social movements also had taken advantage of the developing information and communication technology. This had helped them to communicate effectively and have enhanced the mission of the social movements.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.”Shooting the rapids”in Pagsanjan Falls is one experience tourists would not like not to miss.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays