marketing plan
AgBioForum, 7(1&2): 70-75. ©2004 AgBioForum.
Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the
Developing World
Kynda R. Curtis
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of
Nevada, Reno
Jill J. McCluskey
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University,
Pullman
Thomas I. Wahl
IMPACT and School of Economic Sciences, Washington State
University, Pullman
Worldwide consumer response toward food products made from genetically modified (GM) ingredients has been largely negative. However, the majority of the previous studies on consumer attitudes towards food products were conducted in developed countries in Europe as well as Japan. The small number of studies conducted in developing nations obtain different results from those of the developed world. This paper considers the motivations for consumer attitudes towards GM foods in developing nations. We conclude that the generally positive perception towards genetically modified foods in developing nations stems from more urgent needs in terms of food availability and nutritional content. Additionally, perceived levels of risk may be smaller due to trust in government, positive perceptions of science, and positive media influences. This is contrary to the smaller benefits and higher perceived risks found in many developed countries, and hence, the rational for low or nonacceptance of GM foods in those countries.
Key words: biotechnology, developing nations, genetically modified foods.
Introduction
The use of genetically modified (GM) ingredients in food products has been highly controversial. Consumer attitudes toward GM food products are largely negative in many of the developed countries in the European
Union as well as Japan. Consumer skepticism in these countries is usually attributed to the unknown environmental and health consequences of genetically modified crops. Such consequences include, but are not limited to, unanticipated
Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the
Developing World
Kynda R. Curtis
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of
Nevada, Reno
Jill J. McCluskey
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University,
Pullman
Thomas I. Wahl
IMPACT and School of Economic Sciences, Washington State
University, Pullman
Worldwide consumer response toward food products made from genetically modified (GM) ingredients has been largely negative. However, the majority of the previous studies on consumer attitudes towards food products were conducted in developed countries in Europe as well as Japan. The small number of studies conducted in developing nations obtain different results from those of the developed world. This paper considers the motivations for consumer attitudes towards GM foods in developing nations. We conclude that the generally positive perception towards genetically modified foods in developing nations stems from more urgent needs in terms of food availability and nutritional content. Additionally, perceived levels of risk may be smaller due to trust in government, positive perceptions of science, and positive media influences. This is contrary to the smaller benefits and higher perceived risks found in many developed countries, and hence, the rational for low or nonacceptance of GM foods in those countries.
Key words: biotechnology, developing nations, genetically modified foods.
Introduction
The use of genetically modified (GM) ingredients in food products has been highly controversial. Consumer attitudes toward GM food products are largely negative in many of the developed countries in the European
Union as well as Japan. Consumer skepticism in these countries is usually attributed to the unknown environmental and health consequences of genetically modified crops. Such consequences include, but are not limited to, unanticipated
References: Beech, H. (2002, November 4). China’s next cultural revolution. Burton, M., Rigby, D., Young, T., & James, S. (2001). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. Curtis, K.R. (2003). The industrialized global market for processed potatoes: Contracting, westernization in Asia, and biotechnology. Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University. Frewer, L, Howard, C., & Shepherd, P. (1998). The importance of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic Grimsrud, K., McCluskey, J.J., Loureiro, M., & Wahl, T.I. (2003). Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., & Wang, Q. (2001). Plant biotechnology in the developing world: The case of China (REAP working paper) Hoban, T.J., & Kendall, P.A. (1993). Consumer attitudes about food biotechnology (1995). Consumer acceptance of potatoes that have been genetically modified through biotechnology James, C., & Krattiger, A. (1999). The role of the private sector (brief 4 of 10) Curtis, McCluskey, & Wahl — Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World AgBioForum, 7(1&2), 2004 | 75 Jenkins-Smith, H., & Bassett Jr., G.W. (1994). Perceived risk and uncertainty of nuclear waste: Differences among science, Pachico, D., & Wolf, M. (2002, July). Attitudes toward genetically modified food in Colombia Population Reference Bureau. (2002). Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.prb.org. Kirsten, J., Gouse, M., & Jenkins, L. (2002, July). Bt cotton in South Africa: Adoption and the impact on farm incomes Pray, C.E. (2001). China. In C.E. Pray & K.O. Fuglie (Eds.), Private investment in agricultural research and international technology transfer in Asia (ERS agriculture economics Li, Q., Curtis, K.R., McCluskey, J.J., & Wahl, T.I. (2002). Consumer Attitudes toward Genetically Modified Foods in Beijing, China Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2002, July). Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level, environmental, and welfare effects. Lindell, M.K., & Earle, T.C. (1983). How close is close enough: Public perceptions and the risks of industrial facilities Rissler, J., & Mellon, M. (1996). The ecological risks of engineered crops. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Lusk, J.L., Daniel, M.S., Mark, D.R., & Lusk, C.L. (2001). Alternative calibration and auction institutions for predicting consumer willingness to pay for nongenetically modified corn chips Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D., & Hurd, B. (1990). The effects of risk beliefs on property values: A case study of a hazardous Nelson, C.H. (2001). Risk perception, behavior, and consumer response to genetically modified organisms Nielsen, C.P., Robinson, S., & Thierfelder, K. (2001). Genetic engineering and trade: Panacea or dilemma for developing countries. World Development, 29(8), 1307-1324. Sunstein, C.R. (2002). Beyond the precautionary principle (Olin Working Paper No Swinnen, J.F.M., McCluskey, J.J., & Francken, N. (2003, August). Verbeke, W., Ward, R.W., & Viaene, J. (2000). Probit analysis of