Preview

Mark Knights Cartoon Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1341 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mark Knights Cartoon Analysis
Ben Cousins Cartoon Analysis
In the cartoon drawn by Mark Knight which was published in the Herald Sun, the cartoonist expresses his opinion towards the AFL continuing to allow Ben Cousins to play football and under what conditions. His tone isn’t actually shown in the cartoon yet he expresses his tone by the sarcasm in his drawings, in a way revealing his feelings towards Cousins and the head of the AFL, Andrew Demetriou.
In Mark Knights’ drawings there are a few hidden message for example where the door is open in the background, this appeals to justice as it implies that there is always a way out for AFL players such as Ben and they will always find a way to cheat the system to get there name out of the bad books. The viewer notices this and begins to wonder what if it was someone from the local footy club; could they get away with the same thing? Do illegal drugs and still be allowed to carry on with life at the club, like its nothing. What about any normal bloke off the street if they are seen doing drugs they are automatically labeled as a “junkie” or as a “low life thug” but apparently these terms and conditions just don’t apply to those in the football world.
Also shown in the visual language of Mark Knights cartoon is the frustrated and unimpressed look of Andrew Demetriou …show more content…
This results in the reader beginning to turn against the premier John Brumby, they ask themselves if they can truly trust someone on something that they promise because once he is elected and it becomes official he could quiet easily back out of his promise. This takes me to my next argument the other views of the author upon John Brumby’s revolutionizing
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson Summary

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Changing Work Patterns
    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Changing Work Patterns

    Gough Whitlam was the first Prime Minister of Australia to be dismissed from office, by the then-Governor-General Sir John Kerr. The dismissal was the most dramatic day in Australian political history, however the causes cannot be pinpointed to just one reason. Among other minor factors, it can be determined that the dismissal of Whitlam’s government was caused by the Senate’s acts of blocking supply and breaking political conventions, and the Governor-General’s actions against convention.…

    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Australian Labor Party's 1972 Campaign
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Australian Labor Party's 1972 Campaign

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gough Whitlam Contribution
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gough Whitlam Contribution

    “Maintain your rage and enthusiasm.” (20th Anniversary: Maintain your Rage, 2014) This was the simple yet heavily implicating request left by Edward Gough Whitlam as he expounded his controversial dismissal from his position as Prime Minister of Australia. Born on 11th of July, 1916, Whitlam, who was a member of the Australian Labour Party, was known as “a force to be reckoned with” (40th Anniversary Of The 1974 Joint Sitting Of Parliament, 2014) and was a crucial figure in developing many Government schemes regarding the environment, heritage and federal legislation on human rights.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gough Whitlam
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gough Whitlam

    Gough Whitlam became Australia’s Prime minister on the 5th of December in 1972 campaigning the slogan “It’s Time”. Whitlam and his government the Labor Party the 1st one after more than two decades promised electors an ambitious package of major reform policies. These included an immediate end to Australia’s involvement in Vietnam War and an end to military conscription as well as criminal execution, Free university, A national health scheme, Aboriginal land rights, women’s rights and family law. All These Major Reform Policies were accomplished throughout his less than three years in office as Australia’s Prime minister. Edward Gough Whitlam arrived in the position keen to bring about a number of reforms and a new, progressive approach to the Australian national identity.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does a Speech Maintain Interest Through Rhetorical Treatment of Human Aspirations and Beliefs
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Does a Speech Maintain Interest Through Rhetorical Treatment of Human Aspirations and Beliefs

    Noel Pearson, one of Australia’s most influential Aboriginal leaders, delivered his speech to a highly distinguished academic audience at a time when Australia was struggling with “moral and political turbulence” regarding “guilt about Australia’s colonial history”. Pearson expresses his own thoughts on Aboriginal reconciliation and the necessary steps that need to…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    'Why Weren T We Told,' By Henry Reynolds
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Why Weren T We Told,' By Henry Reynolds

    He exposes past historians for ignoring violence, such as one who claimed ‘Australia was the only country which had been acquired by peaceful occupation’. Reynolds argues that this ignorance prevents Australians from coming to terms with their past, and his criticism is conveyed by his metaphoric classification of the omission as the ‘Great Australian Silence’. He holds that colonisation involved constant violent conflict between settlers and indigenous tribes. To support his view, Reynolds highlights the openness with which violence was admitted and discussed in the colonial era. In Chapter 9 he includes the account of a settler who wrote, ‘our best shots are after them…there will be weeping and wailing shortly’. The writer’s callous attitude to brutality reflects the ubiquitous presence of violence Reynolds wishes to portray. Consequently, he concludes in Chapter 14 that the conflict was part of an invasion process intended to ‘terrorise the indigenous peoples into acquiescence’. Reynolds links this past mistreatment of indigenous Australians to the present day social injustice they face, recalling one lawyer’s statement that ‘he could not bring himself to believe that killing a black man was as serious a matter as killing a white one’. The confession illustrates the way…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    HSC Mod B speech Intros
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    HSC Mod B speech Intros

    The purpose of PJ Keating's speech as Prime minister of Australia in 1992 was to encourage Aboriginal People and their supporters to have confidence in a future that would allow them to participate in Australian life to the same extent as other Australians.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Smith Monologue
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Smith Monologue

    “Why did I, Charles Smith have to be a Real Estate Agent?” “Why did the Australian Government lift the ‘White Australia Policy’?” “Why did Mr Papadopoulos want to sue me?” “Why didn’t I see it coming?”…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1967 Referendum: Indigenous Australia
    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1967 Referendum: Indigenous Australia

    On May 27th 1967, the Holt Liberal government held a referendum to determine whether or not two sections of the Constitution should be removed, as it discriminated against Aboriginal people. As a result, almost ninety-one percent of Australians voted ‘yes’ to alter these constitutional references. This significant event permitted the Commonwealth Government to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do You Speak American Rhetorical Analysis
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do You Speak American Rhetorical Analysis

    Humor - Humor is apparent in his section headings, “The Prince of Prescriptivists”, “Linguists Spring into Action” (MacNeil, page 307) and in the examples that he includes “In downtown Pittsburgh—pronounced “dahntahn”—the question, ‘Did you eat yet?’ sounds like ‘Jeet jet?’”(MacNeil, page 312). He uses humor to keep the audience's attention, so he can insert more sensitive and educational topics.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Maddison Argumentative Analysis
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maddison Argumentative Analysis

    Secondly, Larissa Behrendt, is another Aboriginal activist who acknowledges that the ‘dissent’ amongst Indigenous people is largely because there is still uncertainty in the community regarding the referendum. This also makes Maddison’s assumption that the recognise campaign is a hindrance to constitutional change clear. Running the campaign before a reform to the constitution was proposed meant that Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people could not communicate with the government properly and have no participation in debates. Similarly, the article…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Module B Speeches
    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Module B Speeches

    In his speech, Noel Pearson addresses the need to acknowledge the past mistreatment of Australian Aboriginals. As an Indigenous Australian politician, Pearson gave his speech at the Chancellor’s Club Dinner in the University of Western Sydney to advance equality of Aborigines. Pearson quickly introduces his purpose, “our popular understanding of the colonial past is central to the moral and political turbulence we are still grappling with as Australians”. The illustrative use of turbulence is used to highlight the prevalence of past disharmonies and he uses the inclusive pronoun “we” as a synecdoche for all Australians to unify the audience. By directly quoting authorities such as John Howard and Bill Stanner, Pearson supplements his ethos and strengthens his case by evaluating both sides of the situation. The metaphor, “cult of forgetfulness” has negative connotations in order to challenge the common social mindset regarding the recognition of the past and induce a desire for change. Pearson effectively uses a cumulative list, “You have taken from us not just our land and not just all of the icons of Indigenous Australia…” to illustrate past injustices. The diction is divisive between Indigenous and European Australians, but deliberate emphasis is placed on the past tense to suggest hope for the future. Thus Pearson…

    • 1177 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Political Cartoon Analysis
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Political Cartoon Analysis

    This primary source is a political cartoon that was drawn in 1909 by E.W. Gustin. He named it the “Election Day!” This cartoon was created to show men in America what would happen if they voted for women’s suffrage.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Visual Analysis Abortion Cartoon
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Visual Analysis Abortion Cartoon

    A closer look at the couple in the cartoon shows some clever work on the artist’s part. The woman’s unkempt hair and sharp eyebrows make her look fierce. Coupled with her toothy mouth, opened wide to protest, she looks downright scary. Surprisingly, the man to her right looks much less threatening. His baggy suit and balding head make him look more silly than intimidating. This may lead the reader to wonder if the…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics