Preview

Manslaughter Case in Ireland

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Manslaughter Case in Ireland
ASSESSMENT BRIEF

CRIMINAL LAW

Teacher:

Class:

Date of Issue: 23rd October 2012

Submission Details: 4th December 2012

Source: Irish Independent Newspaper, Irish Times Newspaper and the Irish Independent and Irish Times Websites.
CRIMINAL COURT CASE

DATE AND TIME OF CASE

• The criminal case I studied was the case referred to as the ‘Road Rage Killing’.

• The case was previously held in the Dublin District Court on 12th October 2010 but was postponed so the State could complete the book of evidence for the case.

• Which the trial had been held on 24th April 2012 in Dublin Central Criminal Court. This is the criminal case I have compiled all my studies through media and other law sources for the assessment brief.

NAME OF PERSONS INVOLVED

The names of the people involved in the case were:

• Defendant: Mr Karl Donohoe, a crane worker, aged 31, of Boulevard, Bealing Village, Tyrellstown, West Dublin. Originally from Fisherman’s Wharf, Ringsend, Dublin at the time of the altercation.

• Plaintiff: Directors of Public Prosecution (DPP)

• Victim: Mr Raymond Bates, a construction worker, aged 49, from Peterlee in Durham, England. (Father of 3)

NAME OF BARRISTERS, SOLICITORS AND JUDGE

The names of the people involved in the case were:

• Defendant: Mr Karl Donohoe, a crane worker, aged 31, of Boulevard, Bealing Village, Tyrellstown, West Dublin. Originally from Fisherman’s Wharf, Ringsend, Dublin at the time of the altercation.

• Plaintiff: Directors of Public Prosecution (DPP)
|
• Victim: Mr Raymond Bates, a construction worker, aged 49, from Peterlee in Durham, England. (Father of 3)

• The Judge of the Central Criminal Court Dublin who handed down the final sentence was Mr Justice Paul Carney.

• Defence Solicitor was Michael Kelly acting Mr Karl Donohoe. • Barrister who was senior counsel for defence acting Mr Karl Donohoe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Once the trials proceeded I found that the barristers and the judge himself were very understanding and direct to the defendants backgrounds and current situations when determining the reasons for their crimes. This sat well with the social work value of social reformism (Whittington and Whittington, 2006) and the belief that social and personal problems, can be explained by an individual’s place in society and the opportunities and esteem given to them as individuals. In all cases reasoning was found for their criminal behavior and probable causes in drug use. Therefore it could be said that all three defendants where given a chance in order to prove themselves as the judge handed them all suspended sentences. My personal feelings was that all three defendants where dealt with fairly and ethically. The judge treated them all as equals, showed an understanding nature and worked in an anti-oppressive…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baby P

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was lack of communication between the social workers,doctors, police and everyone else involved in the case, they were clearly not working together which eventually lead to the death of Baby P.Everyone involved in baby p's case could of done something to prevent this from happening. Peters GP was critisised for not raising concerns when he found bruising on the childs head and chest. The police were also criticised for not investigation suspicious injuries and the school peters siblings attended hadnt mentioned the difficulties they had with the mother. The social workers and managers didnt think peter was being harmed. All these agencies failed to realise the risk peter connely was at, along with the fact that the mothers violent boyfriend was living at home and could of been abusing the little boy.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the morning of Sunday 21st April 1996, a young Hobart man, Martin Bryant armed himself with three high powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition and then drove to Port Arthur. North of Port Arthur, he entered the home of a couple he briefly met as a child. Inside he started his rampage, shooting them both. Once he arrived at the Historical Site Port Arthur he ate a meal at the Broad Arrow Café. He then waited till his meal was finished to take his rifle from his bag and began to indiscriminately shoot around the crowded Cafe. Within the first 90 seconds, 20 people had died and 12 were injured. The man then moved to the adjacent car park, where he shot and killed four more people and added to the toll of injured people as well. After shooting at people in the grounds of the Historic Site, he maneuvered into his car and drove up the former main entrance road to the original toll booth. In this area, seven more people were killed in two separate incidents, during which he stole a victim’s car and abandoned his own. Driving north to a General Store, he killed another person and took one hostage then drove back to the place of his first killings, firing random shots at vehicles along the way. At the house, he continued to set fire to the stolen car and then took his hostage inside. Through the afternoon and night, shots were fired at police officers on the scene. At some point during this time, Bryant killed the hostage. When morning arrived, he set fire to the house and was captured by police as he fled. By the time the incidents had finished he had killed 35 people and injured 18. . Bryant had 72 criminal charges pressed against him and 551 witness statements were entered. After initially pleading “not guilty” to 72 charges, his plea was changed after conversations with his lawyer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole on all 35 murder charges, plus 21 years for each of the remaining counts of the indictment.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 14, 1973, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to probation for five years.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scottish Legal System

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Your final task is to investigate the roles of the Lord Advocate and the…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991 Beverly Allitt also known as ‘Angel of death’ was a newly qualified nurse who worked on the children’s ward ‘Number 4’ in a tiny hospital in Lincolnshire. She was the suspect murderer of 4 young children and attempted to murder another 9 leaving them injured mentally and physically. This is including 7 week old baby Liam Taylor who was the first series of suspicious deaths. Beverly Allitt injected insulin in around 13 children attempting overdose and murder them, this was found throughout the blood samples of baby Paul Crampton who survived the attack because he was later on dismissed to another hospital. This was over a period of 61 days of Beverly Allitt working in the hospital and it then became a recognisable pattern to care workers that children were collapsing and dying around the time Beverly was on duty.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eng4c lesson 3

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This editorial is about Jeffrey Baldwin, a little boy who was killed by his grandmother, after he was placed in her care by Children’s Aid. She had previous allegations of child abuse but no one looked into it. They ignored all the signs that could have saved this boys life.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adam Walsh Act

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The case of six-year old Adam Walsh is perhaps one that will never leave the minds of anyone initially horrified by its details. In 1981 young Adam was kidnapped from a local mall and regardless of tireless efforts by his parents John and Reve Walsh, volunteers, and law enforcement; Adam fell victim to murder. Two weeks after the boy went missing, his decapitated head was located, but his body was never found. This prompted his father John Walsh to start a campaign and legislature policy submission toward more stringent accountability for child crime offenders. “The murder transformed John Walsh's life, turning him from a middle-class hotel marketing executive into one of country's best known advocates for missing children” (Thomas, 2008).…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donald Marshall Jr

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was sometime late at night on May 28, 1971 when Donald Marshall Junior and Sandy Seale were walking through Wentworth Park. During their walk, they met up with two other gentlemen named Roy Ebsary and James MacNeil. (1) At this time they had engaged in a conversation with the two men. At some time during their conversation, Donald and Sandy attempted to pan handle them. However, Mr. Ebsary was intoxicated and didn’t take very kindly to people of a different race. He shouted something to do with being black at Mr. Seale then proceeded to stab him in the stomach. After he stabbed Sandy he swung his knife at Donald. He cut Donald's arm. Sandy Seale was admitted to the hospital and died the next day. (1)…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [ 2 ]. Doreen J. McBarnet, Conviction: Law, the State, and the Construction of Justice, London, The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1981.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This report is full of unsafe practice and people in authority have failed to protect the woman as a result of this. The unsafe practice started when the woman was just a little girl, she had made allegations against one of the perpetrators but agencies decided her mother could protect her. The agencies should have taken the allegations seriously and not assumed her mother could have protected her. They could have done things such as carrying out…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is an independent body that was set up in March 1997 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, under the Criminal Appeal Act (CAA) 1995. This body in the past was an experiment which could challenge a criminal conviction or sentence after the court process has finished and it still exists in the present in the English Legal System. This Commission can refer possible cases of miscarriages of justice to the attention of the Court of Appeal to prevent the possibility from miscarriages of justice that had occurred in cases like the Birmingham Six and the Tottenham Three. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission does not have main power to carry out investigation and instead they rely on the police for this aim; this is doubtful whether the commission is fully effective (Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. 2012-2013).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The aim of this case is to present a contemporary criminal case. The case must have occurred in the last ten years. It must be an indictable offence, a more serious criminal charge where the defendant has the right to trial by jury and has been found guilty. The analysis of the case will be carried out through the extent which the law balances the rights of victims and offenders.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays