Preview

Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform
Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform
Andrew Foguth
Davenport University

Abstract The use of mandatory minimums within our judicial system is not winning the war on drugs. This country needs drug law reforms to turn the tide on the war on drugs, and minimize their impact on our society. This comes from rehabilitation programs that are more effective and less costly for our government.

Introduction
Our country has gone to extremes to try and win the war on drugs. There is no evidence to show that they have made any real impact in ending or even lowering the use of drugs in this country. In1986 the federal government enacted mandatory minimum drug sentences. These laws force judges to comply with a minimum prison sentence based on the nature of the drug crime. By doing this, the federal government has tied the hands of our judges to use their judgment depending on the case. Their argument for this is it will deter people from committing drug crimes in the future. My argument is that we are treating an addiction which needs both medical and psychological help to resolve, not longer prison sentences.
Argument for Mandatory Minimums
In 1986 mandatory minimums were enacted to put an end to the cocaine and crack epidemic that was going on in our nation’s inner cities. The focus was if they could apprehend the drug kingpins and lock them away for many years in prison, they would lose their realm of control of the drug world. The reality of the situation is that many gang leaders are in prison today, and have just as much control over the drug trade as they did when they were free men. Many say that the laws have inadvertently become a racial problem within this country. Laws on mandatory minimum sentences are much harsher on crack than cocaine. Since crack is predominantly used among African Americans within this country, they received much harsher punishments than cocaine



References: 12 Step Program. (2008). Retrieved September 21, 2008, from Treatment 4 Addiction: http://www.treatment4addiction.com/recovery/12-step-programs Mandatory Minimums Walters, J. P. (n.d.). Drug Policy Information Clearing House. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from ONDCP: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/factsht/crime/index.html Walters, J What is Cocaine? (n.d.). Retrieved September 21, 2008, from Drug Rehabs: Connecting People With People Who Can Help: http://www.drug-rehabs.com/cocaine-rehab.htm Whats Wrong with the War on Drugs

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    As an American who is privileged enough to live in a wealthy community, attend a good school, and not have to worry about where my next meal will come from, many of my country’s most pressing issues aren’t problems I’m faced with on a daily basis. However, many Americans are uninformed and subsequently overlook one such issue, unaware of the harmful effect it has on their lives. The “it” in question is mandatory minimum sentencing policy. While most people assume these laws have no affect on anyone excluding the person being sentenced, in reality, the effects of mandatory minimums are far reaching. Aside from the prisoner and his/her family, the tax dollars or hard-working citizens are used to pay for the extended prison stays of thousands of fellow Americans. A whopping 67% of them are nonviolent drug offenders, according to a U.S. Sentencing Commission Report to Congress. It is imperative that the American government abolishes mandatory minimums because they have an…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly there are several issues of Mandatory Minimum sentences. Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The biggest complaint about mandatory minimum sentences is that they are unfair. A judge does not have the authority to tailor the sentence to the specific facts. Therefore, someone who was an unimportant part of a drug conspiracy might be stuck with the same minimum sentence as someone who was the ringleader behind the crime. Mandatory sentencing laws also do not allow plea bargains, so even if the prosecutor…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even with this cut it would only drop the prison rate by 14 percent and would still leave the United States leading with the number of Incarcerations. Another vital argument is that when drug abusers are required to have prison time that it gives the court an opportunity to give fair prison time such as the harsher the crime the longer the sentence and it also guarantees that the prisoner can do no more harm to others in society. This is a very important factor of the opposing argument because many people fear for their safety and the safety of others, and if they can guarantee that safety they will. Opposers would also state that punishment is clear to criminals that what they have done was wrong, but rehabilitation shows mercy and some criminals might not learn from their actions. Also you can never really tell when rehab has worked with an abuser, so some might believe they were okay and then end up relapsing, and some might had never been okay and relapse. These are the important opposing arguments, but these arguments are not taking a stand to solve theses issues that America is facing daily, monthly,…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.(2014), “mandatory sentencing was passed in the 1980s, by U.S. Congress and many state representing two bodies with yearnings that it will the settled jail terms to those arraigned particular infringement, much of the time drug offense”. Rather, this cruel sentencing adversely, packing the penitentiaries with low-level transgressors at a higher cost to taxpayers. As indicated by Paul Larkin and Evan Bernick (2014), “mandatory minimum sentences have not eliminated sentencing disparities because they have not eliminated sentencing discretion; they have merely shifted…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minimum mandatory sentences have been established since the inception of our criminal justice system. However, these laws have gained much-needed attention as of late due to the ripple effect it has caused relating to the war on drugs. The war on drugs have been going on since the 1980s, but the use of these laws have created bigger problems in poor communities. These laws have hindered the progression of families and communities. Minimum mandatory sentences are not an effective tool in combatting the issue of controlled substances abuse and trafficking and should be repealed.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance their studies have shown that although around 20,000 drug offenders have been sentenced to mandatory minimums in Massachusetts alone, rate of drug abuse and addiction has not declined. Their argument stands that if mandatory minimum sentences are repealed then that drug offenders should be sentenced like any other case in which someone breaks a law. A judge should look at the person’s criminal history, their involvement and severity of the crime committed, the danger that the person could be to society and if the person needs professional help, such as psychiatric care or drug treatments (FAMM). Mandatory minimums take the role a judge plays out of their…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prison-Industrial Complex

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The War on Drugs and mandatory sentencing laws have also created an increase in prison population, which in turn, make more profits those invested in it. These laws are designed to increase the likelihood of offenders going to prison and staying there for a long time, and they all hit hardest in low income and minority communities.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is simply ineffective and inappropriate for states to focus only on new drug legislation. Twenty-three states have recently repealed drug penalties, including revision or even elimination of mandatory minimums, reclassifying what constitutes a drug offense, revising sentencing enhancements (being convicted of the same crime twice results in harsher penalties the second time), modifying sentencing guidelines, establishing gender-specific pre-trial assessments, and authorizing risk-reduction sentencing (Gelb). Unfortunately, as these 23 states lowered their penalties, 14 states both…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tough On Crime Mentality

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “tough on crime” mentality, as discussed in class, can be dangerous. On the surface, it sounds good. It is an admirable goal to have to eliminate crime and “clean up the streets,” but there are issues with the execution. One issue with the “tough on crime mentality” is that it takes a complex social phenomenon and offers a simple solution, mandatory minimum sentencing. Mandatory minimum sentencing takes away from the complex nature of crime by suggesting harsh sentences for all. Often, harsh sentencing is not always what is needed. Some offenders do not need to be in prison for 25 years on drug charges, some offenders need not be in prison at all. But with the “tough on crime” mentality taken on by many politicians, the laws in place sentence everyone extremely harshly.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I learned more about the War, I realized that drug prohibition causes more societal harm than good, and it is possible for people to use recreational drugs responsibly. We must admit defeat in the War on Drugs, before one of your family members, or friends, or your significant other is arrested and sent to prison for a non-violent drug offense, probably facing a harsh minimum sentence of a couple years and a felony hindering their post-release…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being thrown in jails and institutions has proven over the years to be an ineffective treatment of substance abuse. Clearly there is an issue with the judicial system and its policies regarding addiction. Although the legal system has clear guidelines for punishments, it is still left to the addict to seek out resources to rehabilitate from drugs. Everyone should be very concerned by the staggering statistic of 129 deaths a day from drug overdoses. American’s should not ignore the fact that it is unlikely that drugs will disappear from this country all together, as has been the goal of the government since 1914. Luckily there is harm reduction and rehabilitation which have proven to be effective in other countries, such as Portugal according to statistics from the Drug Policy Alliance. When Americans are found by authorities in possession of drugs they are thrown in jail to be punished by the outdated system. There is little evidence that these punishments are discouraging individuals from repeating the same behaviors. Americans are turning their heads from to this issue instead of talking about what could be done to keep the numbers from rising. Let America live in the solution and not just sit in the problem.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug war

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is outrageous, this is the reason why the war cannot be won because innocent people are arrested for taking these drugs instead of the people who are making them and supplying them. New York Times Author, Dan Baldacci quoted " With less drugs, it allows the people and economy to grow in a positive direction. Less homelessness, dependency, crimes, and jail sentencing would be the direct result of tougher drug policies. If we are serious about a war on drugs, then we have to subject them to regulations and controls that minimise as far as possible their ability to do harm.” I think he is absolutely right because with prevention comes it makes goals easier to tackle.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Drug Be Legalized?

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drug legalization need to be executed because drug wars are of little avail. These drug wars have been spending too much citizen 's money with only a little pay back. Government should not continue wasting the money pointlessly with the hope that “we could actually hold drug use level or see it decline” (Johnson 283) one day in the future inasmuch as this money should be used to decrease the other crimes too for the benefits of all residents but not only for the junkies who actually embarrass the country. Though government claims that the drug wars work according to the increasing rates of captured people who relate to drug, we can see that the money spending on it increasing too. For instance, the federal government spend one billion dollar to arrest few hundred thousand people in late 1970s but nineteen billion dollar…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays