manager
International Journal of Business and Social Science
Vol. 2 No.10; June 2011
How Democratic Leaders Empower Teachers Job Satisfaction? The Malaysian Case
Cheah Lee
Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah
Aziah Ismail
Naser Jamil Alizydeen
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia
11800 Penang, Malaysia
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how democratic leaders work to empower teachers job satisfaction. The present follow-up study uses the naturalistic qualitative and exploratory approach. Semi-structured open-ended interviews were conducted on three schools, selected from the 97 school which participated in the previous study. In each school selected for the present study, individual interviews were conducted with the principals and the selection of randomly 10 teachers from each sample school. Participants were asked to describe critical incidents related to their principals’ leadership and their sense of empowerment. The findings of this study revealed that there are some common attributes of principals that contribute to the successful empowerment of teachers in schools. They include amongst others: upholding participatory and collaborative management; relations-oriented and established trusting relationship; on top of that, these leaders also possess the attributes of transformational leadership, such as individualized consideration, idealized influence and intellectual stimulation.
Key words: Democratic Leadership, Empowerment, Job Satisfaction
1. Introduction
Researches on both effective school and school improvement advocated that today‟s school reform agenda requires a style of leadership different from the traditional top-down, hierarchical, bureaucratic and autocratic style. Due to the increased complexity in the educational system, it becomes probable that no one individual has all the knowledge, skills, and abilities that would enable him/her to accomplish all of the leadership functions. Thus a more dispersed
Vol. 2 No.10; June 2011
How Democratic Leaders Empower Teachers Job Satisfaction? The Malaysian Case
Cheah Lee
Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah
Aziah Ismail
Naser Jamil Alizydeen
School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia
11800 Penang, Malaysia
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how democratic leaders work to empower teachers job satisfaction. The present follow-up study uses the naturalistic qualitative and exploratory approach. Semi-structured open-ended interviews were conducted on three schools, selected from the 97 school which participated in the previous study. In each school selected for the present study, individual interviews were conducted with the principals and the selection of randomly 10 teachers from each sample school. Participants were asked to describe critical incidents related to their principals’ leadership and their sense of empowerment. The findings of this study revealed that there are some common attributes of principals that contribute to the successful empowerment of teachers in schools. They include amongst others: upholding participatory and collaborative management; relations-oriented and established trusting relationship; on top of that, these leaders also possess the attributes of transformational leadership, such as individualized consideration, idealized influence and intellectual stimulation.
Key words: Democratic Leadership, Empowerment, Job Satisfaction
1. Introduction
Researches on both effective school and school improvement advocated that today‟s school reform agenda requires a style of leadership different from the traditional top-down, hierarchical, bureaucratic and autocratic style. Due to the increased complexity in the educational system, it becomes probable that no one individual has all the knowledge, skills, and abilities that would enable him/her to accomplish all of the leadership functions. Thus a more dispersed
References: Abdullah.A. S. (1994). Reevualation school management system. Paper presented in Seminar Zero Defect Penang State Level Bajunid, I. (1997). National Education Pathway. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership. Barth, R.S. (2000). The Teacher Leader. Providence, RI: The Rhode Island Foundation. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research & Managerial Applications (3rd Ed.) Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1991). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. R. (1994). Empowering Teachers: What Successful Principals Do. California: Corwin Press, Inc. Blaze, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership: From Control to Empowerment Blazé, J., Blazé, J., Anderson, G.L., & Dungan, S. (1995) Democratic Principals in Action: Eight Pioneers. Campbell, P., & Southworth, G. (1992) Rethinking Collegiality: Teachers‟ views. In N. Bennett, M, Crawford & C Court, M. (2003). Toward democratic leadership: Co-principal initiatives. Int. J. Leadership in Education, April-June, 2003, Vol Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H. & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading Schools in Times of Change. DeBlois, R. (2000). The Everyday Work of Leadership. Phil Delta Kappan, 82(1), 25-27. Fullan, M. (1988). Change Process in Secondary Schools: Towards a more Fundamental Agenda. University of Toronto: Mimeo. Gronn, P. (2003). The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Hallinger, P., & McCary, C. (1990). Developing the strategic thinking of instructional leaders. Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 89-107. Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micro politics of teacher collaboration. In Blasé, J. (Ed.) The Politics of Life in Schools: Power, Conflict and Cooperation Harris, A., & Day, C. (2003). From singular to plural? Challenging the orthodoxy of school leadership in Bennett, N., & Anderson, L Harris, A. (2001). Building the capacity for school improvement. School Leadership and Management, 21(30), 261-270. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership: a new orthodoxy? In Davies, B. & West-Burnham, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Mamat, I. (2001). School Principalship: Leadership Issues Kuala Lumpur: Budiman Group Sdn. Bhd. Hamid.J, A. (1999). The changing role of school leadership in the context of educational change in Malaysia. Johnson, S.M. (1996). Leading to Change: The challenge of the new superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E.R., & Miles, M.B. (2000). Teacher Leadership: Ideology and Practice. In The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1992) The principalship in an era of transformation, Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3), 77-88. Ramaiah, A.L. (1995). The need to increase the performance of the school leadership Journal of Educational Problems Riley, K., & MacBeath, J. (2003) Effective leaders and effective schools. In N. Bennett, M. Crawford & M. Rizvi, F. (1989). In defense of organizational democracy. In J. Smyth (Ed.) Critical Perspectives on educational leadership Sergiovanni, T.J. (2000). Leadership as stewardship: Who‟s serving who? In The Jossey Bass Reader on Educational Leadership Sergiovanni, T.J. (2001a) The Principalship: A reflective practice perspective (4th ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Sergiovanni, T.J. (2001b) Leadership: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer. Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starrat, R.J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Silva, D., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the Doors: Locking and Unlocking Possibilities for Teacher Leadership West Burnham, J. (2003). in Davies, B. & West-Burnham, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Wheatley, M. (1992). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco: Bennet-Koehler. Wood, P.A., (2005). Democratic Leadership in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Yahya, Z. (1999) Transformational leadership and excellence of the school. Journal of Educational Management & Leadership