Preview

Management

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Management
As one of the oldest and most popular approaches to management thought, Henri Fayol's (29 July 1841–19 November 1925) theory holds that administration of all organizations—whether "public or private", or "large or small" requires the same rational process or functions. This school is based on two assumptions; first, although the objective of an organization may differ; for example, business, government, education, or religion, yet there is a core management process that remains the same for all institutions. Successful managers, therefore, are interchangeable among organizations of differing purposes. Second, the Administrative management process can be reduced to a set of separate functions and related principles.

It has rightly been said by some scholars that “perhaps the real father of modern management theory is the French industrialist Henri Fayol”. 1916 he published “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. It was translated and republished in English in 1929. In 1949 His book was published in USA and from then his ideas became famous. In the world, his book left a permanent mark on managment thinking.

A successful industrialist, Fayol headed a steel and coal combine in France. He is now considered the father of the Universal process or Operational management or Administrative management theory, because he made universal generalizations about management based on his keen insight and practical management experience. As opposed to Taylor, Fayol endeavors to deal with “classical administration.” He focuses his attention on the enterprise as a whole rather than on a single segment of it. He pioneered the concept of viewing management as being made up of functions, and his work supplied a comprehensive framework from which management could be studied and developed. He also repeatedly emphasized that his principles apply not only to business but also to political, religious, philanthropic, military and other undertakings.

Industrial Activities

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I intend to investigate both of these men, who are prolific names within management and organisational theory, and have some contrasting views, but also some similarities and development on Fayol’s theories. I will look at the pros and cons of each argument, and the similarities, then explain my view on the more effective management style.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Fayol’s legacy and to be able to generalize from it, it is necessary to familiarize reader with it. As an early management practitioner and theorist, Fayol has been credited with laying the foundations upon which contemporary management theory and praxis has been built (Pryor and Taneja, 2010). He is best remembered for a three-fold contribution to management thought.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The task: Henri Fayol presented his analysis of the management function in 1916 and it has largely been…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fayol 's perspective of the overall success of an organization was to include the formulation of goals, strategies and plans and to work through others to ensure that these activities were implement. These principles also had to be supplemented and supported by discipline and anticipation (Wren, 1995; 2001). Fayol also believed that management could be taught and was concerned about improving the quality of management (Schermerhorn, Campling, Poole and Wiesner, 2004, p.98).…

    • 1748 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Classical management theorists such as Henri Fayol and F.W. Mooney were concerned with the problems of practical management, drawing on military and engineering principles, creating a pattern precisely defined jobs and organised in a hierarchal manner. (Morgan 2006)…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was one of the first theorists to define functions of management in his 1916 book “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Henri Fayol theorized that these functions were universal, and that every manager performed these functions in their daily work.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Management

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The essay will endeavor to provide an insight into how Fayol’s basic principles of Classical Management Functions are indeed useful in describing managerial work. In the last (20th) century, the role of managers in business becomes more diverse as the number of tasks in which businesses were involved in significantly grew in quantity and complexity. As a result there was an increased interest in the most effective and efficient method of management. This led to the development of different management theories, which included classical management functions which one (1) could argue led to management being defined as the process of organizing tasks through employees to make sure that goals and objectives are met efficiently. (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter 2006, p. 9).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Posdcorb by Henry Fayol

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Management consists of the functions given below. It is based on Henri Fayol's thinking on the functions of management.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David George Case Study

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: 1. Daniel A. Wren, Arthur G. Bedeian, and John d. Breeze, The Foundations of Henri Fayol’s Administrative Theory, Management Decision, 40(9): 906-918, 2002…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of administrative management was introduced by Henry Fayol (1841-1925) and focused on the management process and principles of management. He created a functional approach to management and argued that management is a universal process that consists of planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fayol was a key figure in the turn-of-the-century Classical School of management theory.He saw a manager's job as:…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before the functions were cut down to only four, Fayol’s theory of management was seen to be most effective in any working environment. According to Fayol, planning must forecast the future and always expect the unexpected. Organizing should provide the structure of the organization and recruit, evaluate, and train all personnel. Commanding or leading as an effective manager is to provide supervision and inspire the inferior to work towards a common goal. Coordinating means that managers must match the procedures and activities performed by the company. To coordinate is to make sure that make sure that each activity of the organization complement each other. The last function or element is to control, this means that a manager must make sure that everything is within the organizations plan.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was a French mining engineer and director of mines who developed a general theory of business administration and one of the most influential contributors to modern concepts of management. When 19 years old he started as an engineer at a mining company "Compagnie de CommentryFourchambeau-Decazeville" in Commentry. By 1900 the company was one of the largest producers of iron and steel in France and was regarded as a vital industry.[1] Fayol became managing director in 1888, when the mine company employed over 1,000 people, and held that position over 30 years until 1918. In 1916 he published his experience in the book "Administration Industrielle et Générale", at about the same time as Frederick Winslow Taylor published his Principles of Scientific Management Theory Fayolism Fayol's work was one of the first comprehensive statements of a general theory of management.[2] He proposed that there were five primary functions of management and 14 principles of management[3] Functions of management to forecast and plan to organize to command to coordinate to control (French: contrôler: in the sense that a manager must receive feedback about a process in order to make necessary adjustments). Principles of Management Division of work. This principle is the same as Adam Smith's 'division of labour'. Specialisation increases output by making employees more efficient. Authority. Managers must be able to give orders. Authority gives them this right. Note that responsibility arises wherever authority is exercised. Discipline. Employees must obey and respect the rules that govern the organization. Good discipline is the result of effective leadership, a clear understanding between management and workers regarding the organization's rules, and the judicious use of penalties for infractions of the rules. Unity of command. Every employee should receive orders from only one superior. like from top to bottom in an organization. Unity of direction. Each group of…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics