Preview

A Man For All Seasons - More vs. Rich

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Man For All Seasons - More vs. Rich
English Essay - A Man For All Seasons

Comparing Thomas More vs. Richard Rich

In his preface to the play, Bolt calls More "a hero of selfhood." More refuses to

sacrifice his self, which he defines by his moral conscience, even as he sacrifices his life.

Robert Bolt tries to represent his characters in the form of symbolism turns out to

be a major force driving the action of the play. Characters are motivated by More's

reputation as a moral man, not by More's individual characteristics. Perhaps, in fact,

More stands for being perceived as a saint or a moral man. Throughout the play,

characters such as Rich view More as a representative of a concept rather than as a

person. His consent is important to the king and to Norfolk because it would make them

feel and appear moral. Chapuys - a character in the play sees More as an upstanding

moral and religious man, and Chapuys takes comfort in the fact that the virtues More

represents contradict the king's actions.

Though More was much later sainted for his refusal to swear an oath to king

henery's supremacy to the pope, Bolt does not depict More as someone who ascribes to

religious dogma of any sort. As a hero, More is more existential than religious, because

he looks inwardly for his motivations and does not rely on any external ideals to guide his

speech and actions. In fact, More's morals are continually shifting, and he surprises

Chapuys and other characters with his sharp wit and unexpected pragmatism. . If an ideal

agrees with his conscience, More will do his best to live up to it; if not, he will discard it.

Richard Rich symbolizes the tendency to succumb to the temptation of wealth and

status. Rich and are the same in one aspect because they are both hero's however rich

Rich is a Machiavellian hero. This means he is someone who seeks to advance himself

politically and socially, whatever the cost. Despite his selfishness, Rich reveals his

humanity when he wrestles with his own conscience while

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hale Tragic Hero Essay

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    well. He is noble but flawed, has a specific downfall, and gains knowledge from it; he is a…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Masculinity - Cloudstreet

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * he has not merely constructed characters that are binary opposites of traditionalist archetypes. Instead, he embraces their historical value and carefully constructs his characters to reflect this. However, to a greater extent, through his style, point of view and use of symbolism and language, they come to exemplify…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “like a man chiefly accustomed to look inward, and to whom external matters are of little value and import, unless they bear relation to something within his mind” (56).…

    • 1859 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion there are many themes throughout the play. Revenge, Guilt, and Integrity. Guilt makes people feel a certain way, Revenge makes people act a certain way and Integrity makes people…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jane Eyre Ap Question

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Choose a play or novel in which such a character plays a significant role and show how that character's alienation reveals the surrounding society's assumptions and moral values.”…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More is a man who lived by God and his morals. Being exceedingly educated, he had a way with words and reason. Thomas More was never a fool, but a hero because he held his morals, beliefs, and will high. Wikipedia describes a hero as “in the face of danger and adversity or from a position of weakness, display courage and the will for self-sacrifice that is heroism for some greater good of all humanity.” Beliefs are more important than life, because a person should not live a lie or be untrue to themselves. Although, More did die, he died a good man. He believed in God and knew he had no reason to do wrong. There could have been many opportunities for Thomas More to speak his opinion, but he stood strong and remained silent. Few people live this way, because they put apparent goods ahead of real goods. For example, Richard Rich another character of the play lived off of apparent goods. He wanted and only desired money and power, resulting in being greedy; he did not live by any morals. Yes, I would do the same as Thomas More in an analogous situation. I would not comprise any of my beliefs, values, or morals when being put under pressure. I would want to die honest and truthful to myself and under God just like Thomas More. Thomas More was a not selfish man and he always strived to do the best he could. Inclusion, Thomas More’s death was tragic, but inspiring because he never gave up and accepted the truth.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crucible Outline

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the character is unchanged, describe a scene from the end of the play that shows that this same adjective applies…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Interpretive Essay

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Christian virtues are lacking in the Common Man’s role of the steward. The Common Man’s character, the steward, disrespects Rich by the snubbing manner of which he speaks to Rich. Likewise, when he spies on Thomas More he is being disloyal and dishonest. (pp. 40-42) Furthermore, the steward exhibits greediness by spying on More for Richard Rich, Thomas Cromwell, and Signor Chapuy in exchange for money. (pp.40-42) In addition, pride is conveyed towards Rich by the steward when he behaves as if he superior over Rich. (pp.104-105) Vices are seen in the steward’s behavior.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    were was and her

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    which you explain how the character can be viewed as morally ambiguous and why his or her moral…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Writing and Mrs. Gonzalez

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Think of one character that makes a decision in the play. Identify the decision, explore the character’s motives, and evaluate the effects of that decision.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He starts abusing and scolding himself for that, and by doing so exhorts himself to action of taking revenge, which should be, for him, a be all and end all, as a revenge hero. The earlier mentioned line spoken by the captain also forces him to think about the sense of honour, and he concludes that one should…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later on in the first play his character changes. He is presented as a disheartened, wretched man. This is shown in the line:…

    • 782 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Austen believes that wealth is not a stable indicator of rank. Austen describes why wealth should not determine rank by using characters of different ranks such as George Wickham, Lady Catherine De Bourgh, and Charles Bingley, who also all possess different character traits. Through George Wickham, a man who was born of a lower rank, and who was given a fortune which he squandered, Lady Catherine De Bourgh, a vicious, wealthy Benefactor, with much pride, and Charles Bingley, a wealthy man of the upper class whose wealth has not brought him greed but has kept him sincere and humble, Jane Austen demonstrates that wealth is not a reliable indicator of rank and therefore sedulity and benevolence should determine…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    understand a person until you consider things from his point of view­” (PDF pg 30) …

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude I did not expect the Pope to have such a negative opinion of such a pious man. However, I did expect the French embassy to state poor things about Henry as at the time they visited Henry still held French land.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays