Preview

Machiavelli: a Cynic?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
660 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli: a Cynic?
Many writings argue that human kind is born capable of evil things or that they are born either good or evil. Machiavelli argues simply that man is self-centered and only after self preservation. He argues that mankind is immoral and greedy. His opinions are apparent as he states, "It may be said of men in general that they are ungrateful, voluble, dissemblers, anxious to avoid danger, and covetous of gain," in the eighteenth paragraph of The Prince. These thoughts and views have gained him the title of a cynic. More than a cynic however, Machiavelli is but a realist. Machiavelli feels that mankind is selfish and only exemplifies good qualities from fear of punishment, or when it is to benefit them. One can easily discern Machiavelli's views on this matter from his statement as he argues that it is better to be feared than loved. "Love is held by a chain of obligation which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purpose; but fear is maintained by a dread of punishment which never fails." This is evident today through the structure of two main outlines that greatly shape our lives and develop our world views: our justice systems and religions. Religion and cultural laws always seem to model somewhat after one another. This is an affirmation of the power that fear holds. People greatly fear the religious repercussions of immorality; thus governments tend to take advantage of such a tool and incorporate the same thoughts and ideas into their laws. The two play hand in hand in directing the actions that mankind plays out. When found in a threatening situation, it is only human nature to survive. One would lie, cheat, steal, or hide in order to alleviate the threat. If one were to feel as though they could commit crimes at will, what would stop them? Laws are placed in our world to maintain order amongst all that exist with each other. In the same way that laws instill order, they also instill fear with the promise of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli asserts, “... of men generally; they are ungrateful, fickle, feigners and dissemblers, avoiders of danger, eager for gain” and that men are “treacherous and would not keep their promises to you.” Do you agree with his assessment of people? Explain.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s most famous book, he writes to prospective “new princes” on how to be as successful as possible, without taking into account the morality of any of the actions. For example, in chapter 15, he writes that “it is necessary for a prince, if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to not be good, and to use it and not use it according to necessity” (Machiavelli 93). In addition, he also believed that men were generally to receive misfortune as they “[were generally] ungrateful, fickle, hypocrites, and dissemblers, evaders of danger, lovers of gain” (Machiavelli 101). He believed that during good times, man would likely seek to be friends with fellow neighbors but that in times of adversity, they would only seek out their own well being and be selfless even if one had previously given them a favor. For this reason, he supports the fact that a prince is better off being feared than loved showing pessimism in the nature of humans. He writes, “Love endures by a bond which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present” (Machiavelli 106). Machiavelli supported keeping people in fear to better control them.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli spoke of a balance between good and evil. "In actual fact, a prince may not have all of the admirable qualities listed, but it is necessary that he should seem to have them. Indeed I will venture to say that when you have them and exercise them all of the time, they are harmful to you; when you just seem to have them, they are useful. It is good to appear merciful, truthful, humane, sincere, and religious; it is good to be so in reality. But you must keep your mind so disposed that, in…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Hobbes, causing harm without a cause creates an environment where a certain type of war thrives: cruelty (Hobbes 1996, 101)…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He debates virtue of mercy versus virtue of cruelty. He concludes that virtue of cruelty is better than the virtue of mercy and bases this argument on what helps the people. He states that it is better to be feared than loved, but only if the prince can inspire fear in such a way that he avoids hatred. “It is much safer to be feared than loved...That prince who has founded himself entirely on their words, stripped of their preparation, is ruined; for friendships that are acquired at a price and not with greatness and nobility of spirit are bought, but they are not owned and when time comes they cannot be spent. And men have less hesitation to offend one who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared; for love is held by a chain of obligation, which, because men are wicked, is broken at every opportunity of their own utility, but fear is held by dread of punishment that never forsakes you.” (Machiavelli, 66) This is important because it justifies why a prince must be feared rather than loved. A prince must not rely purely on man’s words, for they are never true. According to Machiavelli, men are wicked and they will break their word at every opportunity they get. Love is held by commitment which cannot be depended on because it is not trustworthy. One might say and act as though they are committed, however, they may be thinking otherwise and because men are evil, they will…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Niccoló Machiavelli, famous Italian political philosopher and author of The Prince, was the first to develop the idea that political morality differs from and is not bounded by the usual ethical norms and insists that power is the decisive factor in political life. Within The Prince, Machiavelli blames earlier political writers for having discussed republics and principalities that have never been seen or known to exist in reality and for concerning themselves with how men ought to live instead of how men actually live. Because Machiavelli bases his arguments on inherent human character, he argues that people are undependable by nature and maintains that it is better to be feared than loved if a union of the two is…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli answers his own question through his ideas of what makes a successful ruler. He argues that a prince is much safer being feared than loved. Machiavelli says “...for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails." (Machiavelli 99). He says that being loved creates opportunity for being taken advantage of and being feared doesn't fail. Bringing fear to his people with cruelty would make them united and loyal. Most people who are fearful of any authority fear punishment, so they are more inclined to not cross the line of disrespect. Without a doubt, being loved is more desired from the people and has a greater value compared to being feared, even though the perks of being feared can make a leader successful.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince Seminar

    • 2799 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Machiavelli sees humans as fundamentally evil. Even though he does point out some good attributes of humans, he gives more reason to believe that they are evil. In Chapter 15: Of Those for Which Men And Especially Princes Are Praised or Blamed, he states qualities that make somebody good or evil. “Someone is considered a giver, someone rapacious; someone cruel, someone merciful; the one a breaker of faith, the other faithful; the one effeminate and pusillanimous, the other fierce and spirited; the one humane, the other proud; the one lascivious, the other chaste; the one honest, the other astute; the one hard, the other agreeable; the one grave, the other light; the one religious, the other unbelieving, and the like” (Machiavelli, Page 61-62). Because of the qualities he listed above, I feel as though Machiavelli has a pretty good sense of what makes up a good and bad person. During this time period, people mainly saw evil in those who did not follow the Church, such as the Jews who were blamed for the Black Plague. Machiavelli touches on some of these qualities when he says “the one a breaker of faith, the other faithful...the one religious, the one unbelieving.” If you were a follower of God and followed the Church, then you were considered morally good. However, Machiavelli understands that a person can not possess all of the traits that make up a good person. He says, “I know that everyone will confess that it would be a very praiseworthy thing to find in a prince all of the above mentioned qualities that are held good. But because he cannot have them, nor wholly observe them, since human conditions do not permit it…”(Machiavelli, Page 62). In this quotation, Machiavelli is outright saying that humans can not be good because they can not…

    • 2799 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, arguably the finest political theorist of his time, wrote in his famous work “The Prince” that a ruler use any methods available to him to maintain stability, for even though some methods might seem abusive and purely attempts toward staying in power, in reality they benefit the people because the ruler manages to maintain stability which is all the people could ask for. If another country is about to attack yours and your people are at risk, would you even hesitate in bribing the other country's ruler or diplomat to prevent escalation? True, the ethics are questionable, but being that the ends are so positive, it would be futile to look at it otherwise. Plain and simple, the means are irrelevant if the ends are positive enough to trump them. Machiavelli defends these conclusions using both explicit and implicit language.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Aristotle's writings on man, The Prince and Nichomachean Ethics respectively, and the management thereof contain divergent ideas of how man should act and reason. They have a similar view of the end: greatness, but the means which the two philosophers describe are distinctly different. Machiavelli writes about man as mainly concerned with power and self-assertion, while Aristotle desires a society of individuals, of honorable men. An excess of the power seeking Machiavellians and an undeniable scarcity of genuine individuals have created a contemporary society so out of touch with its own humanity that it desperately needs an application of Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    to offer to the well being of the state, Machiavelli was quick to mock human…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Nature and Power

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thomas More optimistically describes human nature. He depicts that man by nature is good-willed and conforming. He believes that human nature can be improved. Therefore, if the governing power is to be removed then man would be a less hostile force. Niccolo Machiavelli, on the other hand, describes human nature negatively. Man is untrustworthy, ungrateful, greedy and lying. Machiavelli suggests that man will never change and that one will always attempt to overcome the other. Power and authority is implied in the very essence of Machiavelli’s work. It is tied in with the greed and selfishness.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Niccolò Machiavelli (1469 –1527) was an Italian historian, politician and philosopher based in Florence during the Renaissance. He was a founder of modern political science, and more specifically, political ethics. He wrote his masterpiece, The Prince, which is sometimes claimed to be one of the first works of modern political philosophy in which the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics