In the Prince, Machiavelli focuses on developing virtù as an adaptive skill stating, that a prudent man should “imitate those who have been most excellent” so that he may come close to their greatness. (Mach 92) Machiavelli defines the relationship between fortune and virtù claiming, a great ruler should reap nothing from it but an “opportunity” seized to impose their desired forms upon it, dismissing all suggestions of luck. (Mach 93) Machiavelli places a rift between religious doctrine and virtù claiming, “all armed prophets were victorious” because when disbelief arose it …show more content…
However Machiavelli disqualifies this idea stating, though a man like this is not uncommon, when one is found he is unable to persuade others because “men are accustomed to living one way, and they do not want to change.” (Mach 227) Machiavelli’s meaning of virtù serves as the basis of recovery for lost political potential by simply uncovering it. By presenting history as an application that, with the right skill, can be imitated and amended to suit present situations, Machiavelli successfully reveals the key to worldly glory however; the retrieval of that worldly glory requires the collective effort of prudent