Preview

Machiavelli/King Comparison Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli/King Comparison Essay
Niccoló Machiavelli, in The Qualities of the Prince, gives the qualities a prince should have to

maintain his power, or for an aspiring prince to acquire the throne. Martin Luther King, as a leader

in the African-American Civil Rights Movement, did not aspire to the throne but to freedom and

justice for the African-American community. In this context, he wrote Letter from Birmingham Jail

which was addressed to the clergymen who had previously sent him a letter that criticized his

protestations. This letter can be in some points compared to Machiavelli's treatise. Those points are

the notions of love and fear; that of integrity; and the notion of war.

Is it better for a leader to be loved or feared ? According to Machiavelli: "one should like to be

both one and the other; but since it is difficult to join them together, it is much safer to be feared

than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking." This judgment is based on the fact that men

are not trustworthy, and that they will harm you if you do not make them fear you. Machiavelli

then comes to say that a way to make people fear you, and thereby respect you, is to be cruel: "a

prince must not worry about the reproach of cruelty when it is a matter of keeping his subjects

united and loyal". But King, facing a 'Machiavellian' government that used violence and fear against

black protestations, chose pacifism over violence in his protestations against segregation: "We need

emulate neither the do-nothingism of the complacement nor the hatred and despair of the black

nationalist. For there is the more excellent way of love and nonviolent process." This shows the

contrast between King's belief in the power of love and his trust in men's against Machiavelli's

belief in the power of fear and his distrust in men. But on the other hand, although King's pacifism

relieved his oppressor from the fear of a physical harm, the fear of a social

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince and Discourses, Niccolò Machiavelli talks in great length, and seems to endorse, power, deception, and cruelty. There is one passage in particular that I found to contradict Machiavelli’s viewpoint on dominance and to support the fact that he is perhaps a classical republican. The way Machiavelli praises Rome in Chapter 2 of Discourses shows that he believes there is a way to make the system work without a “prince” being feared by his subjects.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He used metaphor when he referred to drinking to together as white and black, he said “ “Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred”, King meant that we can’t let the fact that the world is so deep in hate control how we will live…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He emphasizes that although everything Hitler did, murdering millions of Jews, cruel scientific experiments, etc., was legal, but it was morally and humanlly unjust just. "It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. But I am sure that if I had lived in Germany during that time I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. King by this statement, portrays his calling within the grounds of segrigation, which is bacisally that no matter if it is illegal, no matter how much trouble or even if there is a high probability of his life being lost,that he would stand up against segrigation, like a salmon going against the un-just river of…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being taught to notice and respond to injustices King fought for everyone to have equal…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of king itself supplies the bearer with too much power for which one man can hold. "All Men are created equal." He had none that denied him of any of his wants and desires, whether personally or politically. A ruler must only be able to derive their "Powers from the Consent of the Governed," of which the king had none. Wise rulers must surround themselves with those they trust. The best rulers truly represent their people.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout our nation’s history, African Americans are consistently and involuntary forced to stand as an omnipresent representation of inferiority. Starved of a Negro consensus, white men—mostly European—began persecuting them and exalting their supposed mediocrity. Hundreds of years after this tenet hit America, an exceedingly astute preacher named Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. exemplified himself as the backbone of the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-1900s. Notwithstanding the omnipotent fear plaguing the Negro community, Dr. King apprehends the vindictiveness of classifying the black men and women as inferior and engenders a movement. One hundred years after the passing of the Emancipation Proclamation, Negros still encountered perilous suppression.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From his letter, I agree with Kings’ argument and ideas in civil disobedience, as a method to eradicate injustice. He elaborates his point of view on the issues that matter most to the community at large. Kings philosophy entails to having a common ground for peace among the diverse races in our current society, and freedom of speech, in order to express ourselves without fear of prosecution. King’s memorable quote, Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, shows the significance of having the same level of authority everywhere, for the sake of equality. King actions made everyone realize the need of having fair treatment without discrimination, and abolishing racism which was, and is still challenge to the minorities. Since the goal of philosophy is autonomy, individuals have the freedom to decide on themselves on what they believe in and use their own reasoning to act and do the right thing that would benefit the society at large. This enables a society to choose what is right for the majority and no to benefit the people in…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a Country to Do?

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    specific qualities that such a man must posses if he wishes to be my king, here in this issue…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning Of Cold War

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. What did Prime Minister King mean when he said, “It is vital to the defence of freedom to maintain… military strength on the side of freedom?”…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is important for a prince to know how to do wrong and apply this knowledge or not depending on whether or not it is necessary.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him?…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays