Preview

Machiavelli And Fear

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli And Fear
According to Machiavelli’s, if you cannot be both loved and feared, then it is better to be feared than loved. This is the second quality that Machiavelli gives advise that will make a good ruler. Every prince would want to be considered merciful, though he should be careful not to mismanage this clemency of his. Machiavelli point out how Cesare Borgia was cruel, yet he was able to provide peace and order to the Romagna. Therefore, no prince should mind being called cruel for what he does to keep his subjects united and loyal. Machiavelli believes that a prince should make examples of punishing a few, by creating some fear to his subject that will prevent disorder, which is better than having entire community unrest. And it would be impossible
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: How To Become A Prestige Prince
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli: How To Become A Prestige Prince

    The goal of being feared by the enemies but not hated by the citizens. Machiavelli gave two examples of circumstances two princes were viewed but achieved to maintain in their countries. Along the lines he said, Cesare Borgia was reputed cruel but by unifying Romagna to order, he was more merciful than letting the people of Florence suffer cruelty by factions. In this way, disregard the thoughts of being a cruel leader as to keeping his subjects in check. “ And for a new Prince, of all others, it is impossible to escape a name for cruelty, since new States are full of dangers. Wherefore Virgil, by the mouth of Dido, excuses the harshness of her reign on the plea that it was new, saying:- ‘A fate unkind, and newness in my reign Compel me thus to guard a wide domain.’” cited by Machiavelli. As follow a new prince can be excused to be harsh in new times to the land, after acknowledging so make sure not to take property from citizens or people for the anger of possession taken is far greater than killing their father. Doing so, a new prince will not be hated by its people but be feared by his…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis
    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince: Christian Humanism

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione
    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli vs. Castiglione

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    (Strength of argument): For Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should be feared than loved by the people and he specifies, “..a wise prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that which belongs to others; he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said” (Jacobus 47). However, in this case, his argument can be flawed and turned against him. (Tempering the Position): Although Machiavelli does a really great significant job of using logic, reason, and history to convince his readers the proper way a prince should rule; however, he didn’t imply support to show how a prince to avoid being hated by his people because, he too knows, that there will be some people who will learn to hate one from their actions they perform. (Conversation): As a matter of fact, I have experienced a situation similar to what Machiavelli doesn’t want to happen. I am not at all a prince, but I have had people hate me for my beliefs, my attitude, or my actions. There was this one time where this girl began to grow this hatred towards me just because I kicked a pit-bull so he wouldn’t bite this little 6-year old I baby sat. My intention wasn’t to harm the dog, but it was the only way to buy me some time to be able carry the boy back inside my house safely. Even though this act I committed was considered animal cruelty, I had to do it to save the child. However, the girl still went against me on this action, so there goes to show that people can hate someone else because of how they see and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli

    Essay #15 Machiavelli believed that a leader should possess the ability to heroically and decisively for the good of their country. Machiavelli’s suggestion that a ruler should be like a lion and a fox was fairly true in Europe. Machiavelli uses a lion in comparison to a ruler because he thought a king should be strong and maintain an honest image. He also uses a fox as a symbol to show how a ruler is deceitful.Catherine the Great of Russia and Elizabeth I of England were both like a lion and a fox through their way of handling problems that they confronted during their reign. Elizabeth I of England and Catherine the Great of Russia were both good rulers who had policies against peasants/serfs, foreign countries,and religion. Catherine the Great of Russia had a strong army as well as Elizabeth I of England only difference was that Elizabeth I of England tried to avoid war but secretly encouraged Francis Drake to destroy Spanish fleets. Catherine the Great of Russia used her wisdom to decide when to use her powers to benefit Russia.Catherine the Great of Russia was like a lion because she suppressed the revolt of serfs which made her look strong. Peasants serfs tried to revolt but were not successful due to Catherine the Great of Russia. Another thing that made Catherine very powerful was the Russian military. She gained a large portion of Poland by leaving conquered Danubian area. Catherine the Great of Russia was like a fox because she controlled the nobles. She had earned the nobles loyalty by giving them control of the serfs. Thanks to the support of the nobles Catherine the…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible and The Dynamics of Fear
    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Crucible and The Dynamics of Fear

    The worst thing one has to fear is fear itself. In Arthur Miller’s play, fear infiltrates the everyday lives of the people of Salem by disturbing many citizens and causing some of them to resort to lies and dishonesty to deflect criticism of their character. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, fear changes a girl’s true nature and power thirsty men begin to crumble at the thought of losing their influence and position in Salem.…

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Julius Caesar And The Prince
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarities Between Julius Caesar And The Prince

    Machiavelli’s treatise responds to the instability and vulnerability of Florence as it faced infighting and external threats following the collapse of the republic where Machiavelli held a vanquished position. The Prince is written with a blunt direct style, free from the ‘unnecessary ornamentation’ in order to plainly represent in the same way he wishes the Medici to rule. As a result of the political context, Machiavelli’s work warns that if a Prince ‘tries to be good all the time’ he will ‘come to ruin among the great number who are not good.’ Machiavelli stresses the necessity of pragmatism as he opposes the laws of man incorporate “living with integrity” with the beast disregarding these principles by thinking “little about keeping faith”. Machiavelli also suggests the people are the foundations of a principality since a Prince ‘who builds his foundations on the people is a man able to command and of spirit, is not bewildered by adversaries, does not fail to make preparations.’ The collective listing of conditions exhibits the difficulty of maintaining stability. Thus, Machiavelli’s Prince is a Sisyphean character as he constantly toils to defend his principality and uphold rule whilst establishing foundations to be inevitably destroyed. The weak nature of power lies within the absence of expansion beyond the foundations which is also a discreet criticism of the futility of the elite ruling class at maintaining stability. Thus, the bleak and barren landscape depicted in Machiavelli’s The Prince is a symbolic representation of the instability within Renaissance Italy and the ineffectiveness of power in establishing enduring political…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    In addition, one of the main points that Machiavelli pushes through out his book is the use of force and fear. It is noted that force is a great way for a Prince to become "strong, secure, and respected"; and he links this force with the devastation that he talks about in seizing and securing a state. Another strong point to give in this argument against Machiavelli wanting a just ruler is the fact that he writes about a Prince seizing a state with "evil means"; he writes that "cruelty can be used well" and gives examples of rulers who had done so previously, and also that if a ruler uses evil means in his acquisition of a state they must decide how much injury or evil they wish to inflict. Machiavelli feels as though in seizing a state cruel acts are a must at first to get the people under control, but eventually he feels the people will forget, and forgive and understand why the acts committed were done. The last point to note is that Machiavelli says that a Prince does not need to be moral or ethical but virtuous and wise; a virtuous and wise prince will be able to keep the population in control, keep the military controlled, and by being virtuous and wise he able to do good for…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty
    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    According to Hobbes, causing harm without a cause creates an environment where a certain type of war thrives: cruelty (Hobbes 1996, 101)…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Influence
    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli Influence

    Machiavelli never thought about how big of an impact and influence, The Prince would be. However, as history tells the work becomes a major part in the Renaissance and becomes one of the most influential works at that time, and becomes the most famous work from Machiavelli, in fact more famous and influential than all of his works put together. During the Renaissance, the reformation came from ideals or theories of political and social issues. Machiavelli played and participated in very involved roles inside the government, from aid of government to officials and also being the leader of a small militia. While reading The Prince, it’s very evident to find that Machiavelli is writing in a tone of telling how to and how not to rule in his eyes,…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    "But fear restrains men because they are afraid of punishment, and this fear never leaves them. Still, a ruler should make himself feared in such a way that, if he does not inspire love, at least he does not provoke hatred. For it is perfectly possible to be feared and not hated." (Machiavelli, 52) If there were no consequences for bad behavior, people would have no reason to act any differently. It is not that punishment in itself creates hatred, but it is how the people are punished that will determine the fear or the hatred they have for their ruler. For example if one is caught stealing and then punished by having to serve some time in jail, that would cause them to fear you and to abide by the law. On the other hand if the punishment were death it would cause the people to hate the ruler for being so un-just and immoral. When a ruler becomes hated they lose all respect and control over the people, for they will reach a point that they can no longer endure the cruelty and rise against you. "Indeed, one of the most effective defenses a ruler has against conspiracies is to make sure he is not generally hated. For conspirators always believe the assassination of the ruler will be approved by the people." (Machiavelli, 57) When people feel as they have been oppressed and abused for to long they will revolt and not think twice about getting rid of the ruler they are discontented with. For once…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lead with Example

    Respect, the most important quality a leader should have, is the basis for any relationship whether it is between friends or a ruler and his people. The prince depicted in Machiavelli’s work has no respect for or from the population and this solely is his major flaw. Machiavelli states, “Spending the wealth of others does not lesson your reputation but adds to it; only spending what is your own is what hurts you”. In order to gain the respect he must forge relationships, sacrifice what is his own and respect the lives of his people. It is seen through his methods of war that he spends the lives of his people frivolously sending them on missions where the fatalities are extremely he high due to the fact he has no care for the population as long as his position is protected from outside enemies . The prince grew up rich, privileged and oblivious to the hardships faced by the…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More