Preview

Ls102: Introduction to Law Unit 4 Kaplan

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ls102: Introduction to Law Unit 4 Kaplan
Unit 4 Assignment

ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Alisha Ricketts

LS102: Introduction to Law

Professor Stephen Renick

Kaplan University

May 21, 2013

The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Conduct so that American lawyers can know the basic standards of legal ethics and professional responsibility. There are certain rules that would be most important to lawyers, and also for law firms. Rule 1.6 of the model rules involves confidentiality of information, and it is a vital rule to follow when dealing with a client that may-be guilty. Rule 1.9 of the model rules deals with the duties to former clients. Then there is rule 1.16 of the model rules deals with declining or terminating the representation of a client. (American Bar Association, n.d) When it comes to law firms the most important rules of professional conduct would include rule 5.4, rule 5.6, and rule 5.7. Rule 5.4 involves the professional independence of the lawyer. Rule 5.6 deals with the restrictions on the right to practice, and rule 5.7 involves the responsibilities regarding law-related services.

Rule 1.9 includes the duties to former clients, and after the termination of a client-lawyer relationship, a lawyer has certain continuing duties with respect to confidentiality and conflicts of interest and thus may not represent another client except in conformity with this Rule. (ABA, n.d) The provisions of this Rule are for the protection of former clients and can be waived if the client gives informed consent. This rule is important for lawyers because they still have an obligation of confidentiality to their former clients, and the lawyer cannot reveal anything the former client had said unless the client gives consent to do so. The former client cannot be an example for the new client, and cannot be treated the same as the former client was.

Rule 1.6



References: Fails as Lawyers Declare the Legal Profession is Not for Sale! The Berkeley Electronic Press. Retrieved on May 19, 2013, from:http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1263&context=elders Shely, L The Shely Firm, PC, Scottsdale, Arizona. Retrieved on May 19, 2013, from: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/pubs/Shely.authcheckdam.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Final Exam

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1) Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I corrected your cover page – all I had to do was center the five lines on the cover page and delete some spacing between the lines. Citations are not correct, spacing is a problem, basic keyboarding problems with a space before a period at the end of a sentence and a space before a comma within a sentence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Example of Irac

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first relevant ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) is Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information). Rule 1.6(a) prohibits a lawyer from revealing information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by (b) where a lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary. The second RPC to be considered is Rule 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation). Rule 1.16(a)(1) prohibits the continuing representation of a client when the representation will result in a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Finally, we must consider RPC is Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal). Rule 3.3(a), (b) and (c) prohibit a lawyer from making a false statement of material fact or law to a court and from failing to disclose a material fact necessary to avoid assisting the client in a criminal or fraudulent act. Rule 3.3(c) also prohibits a lawyer from knowingly offering false evidence.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lesson 2

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7. The paralegals should be familiar with the ABA model of professional conduct because paralegal need to cunduct as professional and resposnable just like attorney does.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    intro to law

    • 2838 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The introduction to law enforcement is about the code of ethics. How you should follow the code of ethics and it should represent everything and officer should be. As an officer everyday we have to make sure that Laws are being followed. Also the ethical dilemmas in police discretion so that no police officer is seeking a change in law to match their own personal views on any issue.…

    • 2838 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    study notes

    • 17427 Words
    • 70 Pages

    CFA Level 2 – LOS Changes 2012 – 2013 Topic Ethics Ethics Ethics LOS 1.1.a describe the six components of the Code of Ethics and the seven Standards of Professional Conduct 1.1.b explain the ethical responsibilities required by the Code and Standards, including the multiple sub-sections of each standard. 1.2.a demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct by applying the Code and Standards to specific situations Ethics 1.2.b Ethics 1.3.a Ethics 1.3.b Ethics 1.3.c Ethics Level II – 2012 1.4.a…

    • 17427 Words
    • 70 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Rules

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Background * Introduction—nature of profession * Preamble, scope 2. Law governing lawyers and lawyer discipline—fundamentals * 1.1—competence * 1.2—scope, direction * 1.3—diligence * 1.4—communication w/ clients * 1.6—confidentiality * 1.15—holding property * 5.4—professional independence * 5.5—unauth’d practice of law; multi-jxn practice * 8.1—bar admission * 8.3—obligation to report other’s misconduct * 8.4—misconduct--violating MRPC is violating 8.4 * 8.5—choice of law provision Lawyer as professional 3. Responsibility for another lawyer’s conduct * 1.2—scope of rep’n * 2.3—evaluation for use by 3rd party * 5.1—attorneys supervising other attorneys * 5.1a is firm mgmt.; 5.1b is supervision * 5.2—subordinate attorneys * 5.3—supervising non-attorneys * 8.3—reporting ethics violation 4. Taking a case * 1.5—payment agreements * 1.18—prospective clients * 1.16—withdrawal * 1.2—scope * 1.8—personal conflicts—incl payment arrangements * 1.6 * 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 5.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Paper

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most controversial cases in American law is Roe v Wade, a decision impacting abortion laws in America. In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that a woman has a right to have an abortion anytime in the first trimester and can have an abortion in the second trimester under stricter conditions regarding the facility the abortion is performed in and the physician who performs the procedure. The decision angered many states because they previously had laws prohibiting abortion because many people at the time found it unsafe and immoral. The court defended its decision based on the 14th amendment, which gives a woman a fundamental right to “personal, marital, familial and sexual privacy” that is “protected by the bill of rights” (Baird 34). Fundamental rights, like freedom of speech, can only be taken away if the state has a compelling argument to take the right away. If a right is not deemed fundamental, the government only has to have a “rational scheme to achieve collective good” (Tribe 10). The most common example of this is driving; a right, which the government can take away for bad eyesight or not following traffic laws (Tribe 10). Since a woman’s right to privacy is fundamental, the court had to find a compelling argument to take the right away. In the past, abortion has been illegal because the government determined that protecting a woman’s health from unsafe procedures, discouraging illicit sexual acts, and protecting prenatal life were compelling arguments that could be used to take away the right to privacy. In today’s society, the court needs to consider similar compelling arguments. The court should find protecting the potentiality of life and the damage abortion can cause to women’s physical and emotional health as compelling arguments that can be used to overturn the decision of Roe v Wade and make abortion illegal in America.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Test Notes

    • 3245 Words
    • 57 Pages

    1 – Partnership Ownership Changes & Liquidations - Heading Chapter 14: Partnership Ownership Changes & Liquidations 3 – Partnership Dissolution - #1 • Dissolution is a legal termination • UPA § 31 & 32: – admission or withdrawal of Pr results in Pp dissolution • When act of dissolution occurs, Prs may – continue business as new Pp or – liquidate 2 – Partnership Dissolution - Heading Partnership Dissolution 4 – Partnership Dissolution - #2 • Remember dissolution is not liquidation • Dissolution – Pp legally ends • Liquidation - winding up of the Pp’s business affairs 1 5 – Admission of Partner - Heading Admission of Partner 6 – Admission of Partner - #3 • Assume new GP gives money/property directly to existing Pp • New GP is promised a % of Pp capital • When: promised share of capital = capital contribution Then no problem • E.g., Assume New Pr contributes $10K and is promised share of Pp capital = $10K: D. Contribution (e,g, Cash) C. New Partner, Capital 7 – Admission of Partner - #4 • When incoming Pr contributes property worth more than new Pr’s share of Pp’s capital  2 possible reasons: – Pp’s net assets worth more than their BVs; or – Pp is worth more than sum of its net assets (GW) $10,000 $10,000 8 – Admission of Partner - #5 • When an incoming Pr contributes property worth less than share of Pp’s capital  One of two reasons: – Pp’s net assets are worth less than their BVs; or – Incoming Pr is contributing more than the FMV of contributed net assets (GW) 2 9 – Admission of Partner - #6 • When FMV of new Pr’s contribution ≠ new Pr’s share of Pp capital  Pp can use on of two following methods: – the Bonus method; or – the GW method •…

    • 3245 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is also the case that the lawyer has divided loyalties - owing a duty to the court while at the same time owing a duty to the client. On occasions, these duties will be in conflict. In these cases, the lawyer is obliged to fulfil his or her obligations to the court. This is not generally understood by clients, or by some lawyers who carry the notion of the duty to the client too far and engage in practices that are unethical and that go to defeat the interests of justice. Making an allegation of fraud in circumstances where there is no evidence to support the claim is an example. Other examples include deliberately delaying proceedings, perhaps in order to force a settlement from the opposing client who is concerned about increasing costs; or issuing writs without their being any proper legal or factual foundation.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rules of ethics

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    rules of ethics are not found in one place. they are scattered throughout other law such as, evidence code, probate code, business and profession, state court rules, federal court rules. they are not the same as morals! Professional responsibility rules are not about being "good." Professional responsibility rules are about acting legally. important: the law counts; personal morality counts less. Where to find those rules. State has codified rules of ethics (made into codes) State probably modeled its rules of ethics after the sample written by the ABA (49 states used the model) ( not CA) websites, the rules change. lawyer rules probably have rules that specifically extends the lawyers rules of ethics to paralegals. Rules of ethics include. rules regulating how one becomes a lawyer. Rules regulating disciplining lawyers. Rules setting forth the minimum standards of permitted behavior. Potential disciplinary penalties. Rules of ethics are fairly concrete, written, statutory, rules, adopted by each state ( and federal jurisdictions), expanded upon and explained by case law. most of the rules do apply to paralegals. Ex. lawyers and paralegals must keep client secrets confidential. lawyers and paralegals have a duty to keep fair time sheets. Ex. lawyers have a duty to surprise their paralegals. some states allow lawyers to accept referral fees. Lawyers advertising is highly regulated. Lawyer ethic rules come from 1900-ish. ABA wrote a sample and state used the to write their own laws.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In theory the doctrine of binding precedent means that judges declare what the existing law is. However many people think that judges actually make law, especially in the High Court of Australia.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction to Law

    • 12945 Words
    • 52 Pages

    Introduction to Law I.BASIC CONCEPTS............................................................................................................... 3 1.WHAT IS LAW?......................................................................................................................... 3 Do' s and DonÆts .................................................................................................................. 3…

    • 12945 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    introduction to law

    • 1228 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Common Law systems, the law continually evolves in addition to being amended by laws passed by the legislature. If a higher court has previously interpreted a statute in a particular law this cannot be overridden by a lower court-the decision of the higher court is a binding precedent. And common law is based on precedent and has been used since before the time when laws were first written down. This system of justice was developed in England and is still being used in Australia, most of Canada, England, India and the United States, except for the state of Louisiana. Judges, who are asked to interpret written law, make decisions, which are then used as precedents for future cases. The Canadian province of Quebec and Louisiana in the United States operate under the civil law system.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal ethics

    • 63142 Words
    • 253 Pages

    CANON 8 – A lawyer shall conduct himself with courtesy, fairness, and candor toward his professional colleagues and…

    • 63142 Words
    • 253 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics