Lost in the Mall
"Lost in a Shopping Mall"�A Breach of Professional Ethics
Lynn S. Crook
Richland, WA
Martha C. Dean
Sydney, Australia
ABSTRACT: The "lost in a shopping mall" study has been cited to support claims that psychotherapists can implant memories of false autobiographical information of childhood trauma in their patients. The mall study originated in 1991 as 5 pilot experiments involving 3 children and 2 adult participants. The University of Washington Human Subjects Committee granted approval for the mall study on August 10, 1992. The preliminary results with the 5 pilot subjects were announced 4 days later. An analysis of the mall study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations, internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall study within scholarly and legal arenas. The minimal involvement�or, in some cases, negative impact�of collegial consultation, academic supervision, and peer review throughout the evolution of the mall study are reviewed.
Key words: research ethics, false memories, mall study, autobiographical memory
[Note: Footnotes are listed at the end of the main text, before the references.]
The "lost in a shopping mall" study (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995) originated as five single-participant "pilot" experiments conducted at the direction of University of Washington researcher Elizabeth Loftus. Loftus (L oftus & Ketcham, 1994) described the study in terms that suggest that proper research guidelines were not followed in these pilot experiments. The results of the mall study continue to be misrepresented in the media in sworn testimony and in scholarly publications. The roles of mechanisms currently in place to ensure the integrity of such research are reviewed here.
EVOLUTION OF THE "LOST IN A SHOPPING MALL" STUDY
Loftus (Loftus & Ketcham, 1994) provided a revealing account of the evolution of the mall study. In August 1991, Loftus attended a
Lynn S. Crook
Richland, WA
Martha C. Dean
Sydney, Australia
ABSTRACT: The "lost in a shopping mall" study has been cited to support claims that psychotherapists can implant memories of false autobiographical information of childhood trauma in their patients. The mall study originated in 1991 as 5 pilot experiments involving 3 children and 2 adult participants. The University of Washington Human Subjects Committee granted approval for the mall study on August 10, 1992. The preliminary results with the 5 pilot subjects were announced 4 days later. An analysis of the mall study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations, internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall study within scholarly and legal arenas. The minimal involvement�or, in some cases, negative impact�of collegial consultation, academic supervision, and peer review throughout the evolution of the mall study are reviewed.
Key words: research ethics, false memories, mall study, autobiographical memory
[Note: Footnotes are listed at the end of the main text, before the references.]
The "lost in a shopping mall" study (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995) originated as five single-participant "pilot" experiments conducted at the direction of University of Washington researcher Elizabeth Loftus. Loftus (L oftus & Ketcham, 1994) described the study in terms that suggest that proper research guidelines were not followed in these pilot experiments. The results of the mall study continue to be misrepresented in the media in sworn testimony and in scholarly publications. The roles of mechanisms currently in place to ensure the integrity of such research are reviewed here.
EVOLUTION OF THE "LOST IN A SHOPPING MALL" STUDY
Loftus (Loftus & Ketcham, 1994) provided a revealing account of the evolution of the mall study. In August 1991, Loftus attended a
References: Associated Press. (1992, August 14). Analyst doubts abuse "memories." Tri-City Herald, A5. Coan, J. A. (1997). Lost in a shopping mail: An experience with controversial research. Ethics & Behavior, 7, 271-284. Ganaway, G. (1991, August). Alternative hypotheses regarding satanic ritual abuse memories. Presentation at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco. Garry, M., Manning, C., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 208-214. Goleman, D. (1992, July 21). Childhood trauma: Memory or invention? New York Times, C1. Haney, D. Q. (1997, February). Studies suggest false memories are common in everyday life. Associated Press wire, AP-ws-02-15-97, l4l6est. Klein, R. B. (1995, June). The nature of memory: An interview with Prof. Elizabeth F. Loftus, Ph.D. Verdicts, Settlements & Tactics, 15(6), 191-195. Loftus, E. F. (1992, August 14-18). The reality of repressed memories. Speech presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association. (Cassette Recording No. 92-013). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Loftus, E. F. (1996). Memory distortion and false memory creation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24(3), 281-295. Loftus, E. F., Coan, J. A., & Pickrell, J. E. (1996). Manufacturing false memories using bits of reality. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 195-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory. New York: St. Martin�s Press. Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25, 720-725. Morrison, J. (1996, December). You must remember this. George, 52. Pezdek, K. (1995, November). Planting false childhood memories: When does it occur and when does it not? Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles. Russell, C. (1997, February 25). Suggestion said to fuel "imagination inflation." The Washington Post, Z11. Secretary of the University of Washington Faculty. (Ed.). (1970, October). University of Washington handbook. Seattle: University of Washington. University of Washington Human Subjects Review Committee Application, No. 22-175-C (August10, 1992).