Preview

Locke and Hobbes: Cause of Religious Toleration

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1970 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Locke and Hobbes: Cause of Religious Toleration
Locke and Hobbes Cause of Religious Toleration
Kevin Kang
Professor Bartlett
Section Leader: Alexander Duff

Historically, Locke’s treatment of toleration was one riddled with religious change, religious turmoil, and political changes that were shaped largely by religious tensions. This was a time when religion, specifically the Christian Church, became fractioned and led to widespread war and death in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Locke’s Letter on Toleration promoted separation of church and state, arguing that each institution has legitimacy and power in certain areas. The state exists to protect people’s interests, and can use force to protect these interests. However, the state will not be able to coerce its people to believe in a certain religion. In Leviathan, Hobbes provides ideas that support Locke’s toleration of religion. Hobbes belief in the state of nature, state of war, and covenants helps to paint a clearer picture of a world without religious intoleration. Locke’s plea for tolerations is one of religious toleration in general but more specifically toleration among Christians. Locke speaks out against Christians whom “deprive (men) of their estates, maim them with corporal punishments, starve and torment them in noisome prisons, and in the end even take away their lives…”(Letter p.24). This type of intolerance is itself intolerable because it violates many mandates that should characterize a true Christian. The mandates of charity and meekness are violated, and those who have committed these aggressive and violent actions against others are in themselves hypocritical. These people are usually careless about their own virtues, imposing on others something they don’t practice. According to Locke, instead of looking into others moral salvation, they should practice looking into their own moral salvations as well as the salvations of family and friends. These same people are spending time and effort on trivial things like doctrinal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his lifetime Locke published three works: A Letter Concerning Toleration, Two Treatises of Government and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, the latter being the most influential. A Letter Concerning Toleration was originally published by Locke’s friend without his knowledge. In it, he expresses his views on religion and how the only way to a peaceful society is through freedom of religion. He reasons that unrest comes from a ruler forcing one religion on all people rather than letting people choose what they believe.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [3] Fred Anderson, Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the fate of Empire in British North America 1754-1766,(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, February 11, 2000; London: Faber and Faber, 2000).…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    His very influential, “Letter on Tolerance” was written to appease highly violent social and religious disagreements. He wrote this in response to the horribly bloody Catholic vs. Protestant wars, the Inquisition, civic and religious persecution, and his first hand experience of persecution when he was in exile in Amsterdam. These epidemics cannot be compared to the civil, yet still important, modern debates. Locke explained that his use for tolerance was that it took away cause for hostility, helped those were believed differently to gain trust and acceptance, to live peaceably with one another, and it also helped to separate the church and state. Locke says that the state’s responsibility is entirely and only secular: to protect the public good and to provide peace and security. (Locke, Letter Concerning Toleration). Tolerance is a mentality that can be good, and was meant to bring peace and stability, but more often than not, it is used as an excuse to shut people down and cut off any controversial topics. It is used so there is never a point where there are people who are uncomfortable. Sometimes people do not want to hear the truth because it contradicts their beliefs and they like to stay comfortable in their actions. Tolerance can be good in some ways. Locke meant for toleration to be a way that violence between opposing religious, social, and racial groups would be…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exegesis of Thomas Hobbes

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes was an Englishman who wrote the Leviathan during the English Civil War in the 17th century. Naturally Hobbes spends chapter five, and most of the Leviathan describing how to avoid internal conflict. Hobbes argues that by using logical reasoning and eliminating disagreement a state can avoid internal conflict. Hobbes begins chapter five with a definition for reason and the operations that are involved. Hobbes continues his explanation of reason by describing the proper use of reasoning and how absurdity arises. He elaborates on errors and absurdities, explicitly their causes. Hobbes ends chapter five with his description of the connection between reason and science.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs. Locke

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Locke, John, and C. B. Macpherson. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 1980. N. pag. Print.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two of the great political theorists of their time. They both provided wonderful philosophical texts on how our government should govern us. This paper will show the largest differences and some of the similarities between Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government. Although they do have some similarities, Hobbes and Locke have different views on most of their political arguments, and I will expand on their differences on the state of nature, government, and social contract.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an absolute monarchist that believed human beings were organisms that were in constant motion, and needed to have some sort of authority or restraint, so they could be stopped from pursuing any selfish act. In contrast to John Locke were he believed in a democratic rule and constitutes that human nature was identified by reason and tolerance. The political ideology that Hobbes obtains is precise regarding the following points: people are naturally born with rights but must give up any right to the monarch so in return they receive protection, humans are naturally wicked, cruel, inhumane and selfish, no individual can be trusted to govern themselves and cannot maintain order, and the main purpose of a government body is to implement law and order. It is normal to be in a state of war knowing the reality of human nature, being in constant conflict amongst…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Gauthier, D. (1969) The Logic of ‘Leviathan’: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke is arguing that even though God created matter; out of all the matter there is that can produce material things; those material things do not know God exists. Material substances as well as ourselves are not made to last eternally. Therefore, a person should not find satisfaction in materialistic things. Another part of Locke’s argument that I noticed is that a person cannot rely on these things to please God. Matter is constantly changing into different forms; while God does not.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are humans naturally good or evil? I will mention two philosophers with two different thoughts on this. Hobbes believed we are all naturally evil and should be contained. Locke believed humans are reasonable and can rule themselves. I think humans are naturally evil, but Locke brings up some valid points as well.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Protestant Ethic declares that human mindset is based on reason. In addition, this Ethic describes that people are capable of being individuals while also contributing to the collective welfare of a given society. Weber notes that they key characteristics of the Protestant Ethic are a growing skepticism of authority, money and industry, rationality, individualism and investment Although at times unaware, many great thinkers who constructed legal documents after the spreading of the Protestant Ethic used this opinion to formulate their own arguments. For example, Locke’s “Second Treatise of Civil Government” contains his analysis of human nature. While keeping “individuals” in mind, Locke proposes certain regulations necessary for a functioning government. Locke’s treatise is primarily a reflection of the Protestant Ethic and its correlation to administration. “The Second Treatise of Civil Government’ discusses a nation of peace and safety, a society based on equality, and a country that with all of its individuals still maintains a sense of unity.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays