Local and Regional Forces
Section B. Is local diversity a product of regional forces, local forces, or both, and how might we know?
In ecology, the change in species diversity across space and time is one of the oldest studied subjects, however the underlying causes of many diversity patterns is under much debate (Field et al. 2001; MacArthur, 1972; Rosenzweig, 1995). How does diversity arise (Erwin 1991)? How is diversity distributed in space (Dean et al. 1997, Fonseca et al. 2000)? And how is diversity maintained (Lande, 1988)? Are three fundamental questions that ecologist look to answer. Early studies focused around the role of competition in determining diversity at local scales, today however it is emphasized that many factors on top of competition, such as dispersal, predation, variation in the physical environment, and historical factors, influence diversity patterns across a range of scales (Rosenzweig, 1995).
According to MacArthur (1965) local dynamics happened quickly compared to regional dynamics and so due to the filling of ‘niche space’, communities would be ecologically saturated with species. This led to the conclusion that historical/biogeographic process like speciation and extinction rates could be dis-included when explaining local diversity. This resulted in local ecological processes being a default belief for terrestrial community ecologists. In contrast to this ‘Niche theory’, where diversity is limited to local factors, MacArthur & Wilsons (1967) equilibrium theory of Island Biogeography considers that local diversity is thought of as a chance of events of immigration and extinction, determined by regional processes. The conflict between the two theories simultaneously explaining community structure at different scales was referred to as ‘MacArthurs Paradox’ (Schnoener, 1983) and is still debated today.
Communities are assembled through a series of filters, representing historical and ecological constraints on arrival and survival of local
In ecology, the change in species diversity across space and time is one of the oldest studied subjects, however the underlying causes of many diversity patterns is under much debate (Field et al. 2001; MacArthur, 1972; Rosenzweig, 1995). How does diversity arise (Erwin 1991)? How is diversity distributed in space (Dean et al. 1997, Fonseca et al. 2000)? And how is diversity maintained (Lande, 1988)? Are three fundamental questions that ecologist look to answer. Early studies focused around the role of competition in determining diversity at local scales, today however it is emphasized that many factors on top of competition, such as dispersal, predation, variation in the physical environment, and historical factors, influence diversity patterns across a range of scales (Rosenzweig, 1995).
According to MacArthur (1965) local dynamics happened quickly compared to regional dynamics and so due to the filling of ‘niche space’, communities would be ecologically saturated with species. This led to the conclusion that historical/biogeographic process like speciation and extinction rates could be dis-included when explaining local diversity. This resulted in local ecological processes being a default belief for terrestrial community ecologists. In contrast to this ‘Niche theory’, where diversity is limited to local factors, MacArthur & Wilsons (1967) equilibrium theory of Island Biogeography considers that local diversity is thought of as a chance of events of immigration and extinction, determined by regional processes. The conflict between the two theories simultaneously explaining community structure at different scales was referred to as ‘MacArthurs Paradox’ (Schnoener, 1983) and is still debated today.
Communities are assembled through a series of filters, representing historical and ecological constraints on arrival and survival of local
References: Bellwood, D. R., Connolly, S.R. & Hughes, T.P (2003). Indo-Pacific biodiversity of coral reefs: deviations from a mid-domain model. Ecology 84: 2178–2190. Bellwood, D. R., Connolly, S.R., Hughes, T.P. & Tanner, J. (2005). Environmental and geometric constraints on Indo-Pacific coral reef biodiversity. Ecology Letters. 8: 643–651. Blenckner, T. & Hillebrand, H. (2002). Regional and Local impact on species diversity from pattern to processes. Oecologia 132: 479-491. Buzar, M.A., Collins, L.S. & Culver, S.J. (2002) Latitudinal Difference in biodiversity caused by higher tropical rate of increase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.11: 99(12) 7841-3. Caley, M.J. & Schluter, D. (1997). The relationship between local and regional diversity. Ecology. 78: 70–80. Compton, S.G. & Hawkins, B.A. (1992). African fig wasp communities: under saturation and latitudinal gradients in species richness. .Journal of Animal Ecology. 61: 361–372. Cornell, H. V. (1985). Local and regional richness of Cynipine gall wasps on California oaks. Ecology. 66: 1247–1260. Cornell, H.V. (1999). Unsaturation and regional influences on species richness in ecological communities: a review of the evidence. Eco-science. 6:303–315 Cornell, H Cornell, H.V., Hughes, T.P. & Karlson, R.H. (2004). Coral communities are regionally enriched along an oceanic biodiversity gradient. Nature. 429: 867–870. Cornell, H. V., Hughes, T.P. & Karlson, R. H. (2008). Local–regional species richness relationships are linear at very small to large spatial scales in west–central Pacific corals. Coral Reefs. 22: 145–151. Cornell, H.V. & Karlson, R.H. (1996) Species richness of reef-building corals determined by local and regional processes. Journal of Animal Ecology. 65:233–241 Cornell, H.V Cornell, H. V. & Karlson, R. H. (1998). Scale dependent variation in local vs. regional scale effects on coral species richness. Ecology Monogram. 68: 259–274. Cornell, H.V. & Lawton, J.H. (1992) Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Animal Ecology. 61:1–12 Dean, D Eeley, H.A.C. & Lawes, M.J. (1999) Large-scale patterns of species richness and species range size in anthropoid primates. Primate communities (ed. by J.G. Feagle, C. Janson & K.E. Reed). pp. 191– 219. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Erwin, T. L. (1991). An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science. 253:750–752. Field, R., Whittaker, R. J. & Willis, K.J. (2001). Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography. 28:453–470. de Fonseca, G. A. B., Kent, J., Mittermeier, C. G., Mittermeier, G. A. B. & Myers, N., R. A. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. Gaston, K.J. (2000). Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature. 405: 220 – 227. Gaston, K.J. & Koleff, P. (2002). The relationship between local and regional species richness and spatial turnover. Global ecology and biogeography. 11: 363-375 Grace, J Griffiths, D. (1997) Local and regional species richness in North American lacustrine fish. Journal of Animal Ecology. 66: 49–56. Huston, M. A. (1999). Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understand variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos. 86: 393–401. Jablonski, D., Roy, K. & Valentine, J.W (2006) Out of the Tropics; Evolution Dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science. 314: 102-106 Lande, R Lawton, J.H. (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177–192 MacArthur, R MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Geographical ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press. Partel, M., Szava-Kovats, R.C. & Zobel, M. (2011) the local-regional species richness relationship: new perspective on the null-bypothesis. Oikos. 121:3. 321-326. Ricklefs, R.E. (1987). Community Diversity: Relative Roles of local and regional processes. Science. 235: 4785. 161-171. Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (1993) Species diversity: regional and historical influences. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill. pp 350–363 Ricklefs, R Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Rosenzweig, M Schoener, T.W. (1983). Rate of species turnover decreases from lower to higher organisms: a review of the data. Oikos. 41: 372–377. Shurin, J.B. (2001). Interactive effects of predation and dispersal on zooplankton communities. Ecology. 82: 3404–3416 Srivastava, D.S Zobel M (1997) The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecological Evolution. 12: 266–269