Preview

Limitations of Self-Report Data

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Limitations of Self-Report Data
Running head: LIMITATIONS OF SELF-REPORT DATA

Assignment 2
Limitation of Self-Report Data by Samantha, BScOT

Faculty of Behavioral Sciences,
YUniversity
for
Theories of Personality
Professor
August 8, 2011

Abstract
There has been a rapid increase in the development of web based psychological self-help sites over the past decade. Many of these sites offer test and measures focusing on various aspect of personality and psychological functioning. The tests on the websites use self-report data to obtain information. While self-report data is easily obtained and is considered a reliable source of information in most circumstances, it is not without its limitations. This paper will examine the limitations of self-report data (S-Data) using the “Personality Disorder Test” obtained from the website www.4degreez.com.
Literature Review: An Overview of Self-Report Data Self-Report Data (S-Data) is data obtained about the individual from individual’s own perspective. Often used in psychological questionnaires, S-Data is easy to obtain and, assuming the individual has insight, is considered to be “expert knowledge” (Dyce, n.d.c). The Big Five is an example of Self-Report Questionnaire, as are the MMPI and NEO PR-I.
Information obtained by self report, while easy and simple, is prone to issues which affect the validity and reliability of the assessment outcome. This report will use the “4degreez.com-Personality Disorder Test” to explore the limitations to data obtained through self reported questionnaires and assessments.
Limitations of Self-report Data There are a number of issues which are present when using self-reporting as a measurement for personality disorder or any other psychological assessment. This is particularly true if the self-report is the only for of assessment being used to determine a diagnosis or to categorize an individual into personality disorder realms. A paper by Razavi (2001) suggests that validity is questionable if



References: Dyce, J. (n.d.a). Introduction to personality. PSYC6113 Professor’s PowerPoint Notes. [MS Word PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved on August 1, 2011 from http://www.jamiedyce.com/6113.htm Dyce, J. (n.d.b).Introduction to personality. PSYC6113 Professor’s PowerPoint Notes. [Audio recordings].  Retrieved on August 1, 2011 from http://www.jamiedyce.com/Audio3.mp3 Dyce, J. (n.d.c). Psychometrics, assessment and research design. PSYC6113 Professor’s PowerPoint Notes. [Audio recordings].  Retrieved on August 1, 2011 from http://www.jamiedyce.com/Audio6.mp3 Personality Disorder Test. Retrieved on July 24, 2011 from http://www.4degreez.com/misc/personality_disorder_test.mv Naglieri, J.A. (2004). Psychological testing on the internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychological Association. 59(3): 150-162. Razavi, T. (2001). Self-report measures: An overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research. Retrieved on August 4, 2011 from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/35712/1/01-175.pdf Vallejo, M. A., et al. (2007). Psychological assessment via the internet: A reliability and validity study of online (vs paper-and-pencil) versions of the general health questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the symptoms check-list-90-revised (SCL-90-R).PsychJ Med Internet Res. 9(1). Doi:  10.2196/jmir.9.1.e2

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The range of axis II should be broadened to encompass the range of personality pathology seen in clinical practice. Personality pathology is difficult to measure. Current instruments have problems with validity and rely on a direct-question format that may be inappropriate for the assessment of personality. In addition, they are designed specifically to address current DSM-IV categories and criteria, which limit their utility in making meaningful revisions of those criteria. These problems suggest the need for consideration of alternative approaches to assessing and revising axis…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th Ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rorskblot Test Validity

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case discussing both projective and self-report personality tests in terms of their reliability and validity in a social context. These tests are extremely useful in multiple ways such as calculating future behaviour and recognizing future behaviours according to Plotnik (2002). There are so many personality tests available for use but this essay will discuss the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2, the Rorschach Inkblot test and the Thematic Apperception Test. These personality tests are used by various people in society such as researchers, doctors and employers, because it allows them to analyse someone’s personality and draw conclusions relative to their area. Although the extent to which each test is accurate can be disputed. Before the tests can be discussed in terms of their reliability and validity we must first understand how each of them test for…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Achieving construct validity, or using measures that accurately represent particular theoretical constructs, is an important goal of social science research. This article reviews arguments regarding the strengths and limitations of personality assessment methods in terms of methodological feasibility and whether they are accurate in measuring personality constructs. Specifically, it considers the advantages and disadvantages of assessing personality with self-report questionnaires, informant reports, and behavioural measures. Acknowledging that no method is perfect, the discussion then focuses on the value of incorporating multiple methods. In light of the reliance on the self-report method in personality psychology, it will be argued that researchers could maximize the validity of the measurement of personality constructs by combining the questionnaire approach with other methods.…

    • 8031 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is no infallible indicator of personality. There are four kinds of personality data: self-report, information, life, and behavioral. Each one has it’s advantages and disadvantages. When conducting research on personality, each must be considered in order to draw valid and reliable conclusions about personality. This is because no one observation fits neatly into one set of data. There is an endless number of combinations. If one approach is used while the other ignored, it could lead to error (p. 45). Error is already an issue when it comes to interpretation, so if the data is skewed, then error is inevitable.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using personality assessments can benefit in many different ways. These test are here to help an employer to hire or promote…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Girl Interrupted

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Blais MA, Smallwood P, Groves JE, Rivas-Vazquez RA. Personality and personality disorders. In: Stern TA, Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Biederman J, Rauch SL, eds. Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry. 1st ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Mosby Elsevier;2008:chap 39.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2009). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Biblical vs Humanistic

    • 3058 Words
    • 13 Pages

    References: Ammerman, R. T. (2006). Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology Volume 3. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.…

    • 3058 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    [ 2 ]. source found on cnn.com / © 1998-2006 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories Of Criminology

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When it comes to personality disorders the “symptoms” first appear in children, although according to Holmes et al (2001) some of the more prominent disorders do appear to have a relationship with adult behaviour later in life.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personality disorders are diagnosed by a classical system of descriptive psychopathology within a framework adopted by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and published in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) (). The DSM has had many revisions with the latest revision being published in 2000. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV-TR) is used to diagnose psychiatric illness. The DSM-IV TR has a multiaxial approach that includes five dimensions. Axis I: Clinical Syndromes, Axis II: Personality and Mental Retardation, Axis III: Medical Conditions, Axis IV: Psychosocial and Environmental Problems, and Axis V: Global Assessment of Functioning (PsychiatryOnline.org). Oldham places personality disorders on Axis II and this is also a general consensus in the United States.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personality disorders are a group of conditions that have long term behavior patterns that come from expectations of society and the serious problems in relationships which are created. People with personality disorders tend to be inflexible, rigid and manipulative (Hooley, Butcher, Nock, & Mineka, 2017). They often have one set way or perspective of everything and have difficulties connecting with other people socially. The DSM-5 personality disorders are grouped together into three groups based on the similarities between the disorders. Focusing on Cluster B personalities, they tend to be very dramatic, emotional and unstable (Hooley, Butcher, Nock, & Mineka, 2017). There are four disorders listed in this subcategory: histrionic, narcissistic,…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the many ways that exist to classify and conceptualize individual differences, some are obvious and somewhat visible, such as gender, race, language, origin and / or social background. Other forms, perhaps not as visible, are nonetheless influential distinctions such as culture or personality. The personality, like many things in life can be difficult to explain, is what makes every human being different, unique and exceptional. Today, the personality is an issue around the world. It reflects who we really are. Although most people use the term "personality" to identify the most obvious characteristics of a persons, psychologists are addressed in regards to this to explain why people with similarity in genetic background, experience and motivations can react quite differently to the same situation, and to explain why people with different genetic, experience and / or motivations past, but similar reactions to a single event. I intend to share with you my account of the personality, as it defines me as an individual and finally I will discuss what factors make a personality test is reliable and valid.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comer, Ronald J. "Personality Disorders." Fundamentals of Abnormal Psychology, Sixth Edition. New York: Worth Pub., 2011. 420. Print.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays