Preview

Life Without Parole For Juvenile Criminals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Life Without Parole For Juvenile Criminals
The U.S. stands alone as the only country that sentence people to life without parole for crimes committed turning 18. Most of the approximately 3,000 individuals sentenced to life without possibility of parole now have a chance for release in the wake of recent Supreme Court decisions. The choice to allow teenagers to receive the harshest available sentence is not shared among all states. I believe they should receive life without parole if they committed any murder because it is the law and they broke it. Also another reason, is because it is the victim and the family of the victims right to press charges. Lastly, they are deterrent to crime under the age of 18. Nineteen states and the district of Columbia do not have any prisoners serving life without parole for crimes committed as juveniles, either due to laws prohibiting the sentence or because there are no individuals serving the sentence at this time. …show more content…
” No one sentenced to life without parole has ever been released on parole, in california or in any other state.” It says that in an article from www.aclunc.org. I support their argument because if you committed a crime why would the law change for you if you are just going to break it. Some of the audience would feel like they make those bad decisions because their immaturity level is not prominent like an adults would be. I personally think that is wrong because you should know between what is right and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone has the right to a second chance , a chance to make changes , a chance to learn from every mistake that is or was made. In article “Juveniles Don't deserve life sentences” by Gail Garinger postulates , “An overwhelming majority of young offenders grow out of crime.”. Most of the juveniles that make heinous as they grow up, they grow out of the mentality that they had once the crime was committed. Why not give them a chance to show that they have mature and that there mentality isn't the same?. Also Gail Garinger believes that “...it is impossible at that time of sentencing for mental health professionals to predict which youngster will fall within that majority and grow up to be productive, law-abiding citizens and which will…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court system for juveniles in the United States was first formed in 1899, in Cook County, Illinois, which then was quickly spread across the country and most other state courts decided to establish one as well, that then in turn created the juvenile justice system. With the purpose of rehabilitating each underage offender in order for them to become a productive part of society and also to protect them by having them separated from any type of exposure to adult offenders and mentally ill adult offenders that were incarcerated as well.…

    • 3966 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Their crimes may even become more serious in nature. Therefore, teens that commit heinous crimes should be punished for their obnoxious behavior. In “Juvenile Doesn’t Deserve Life Sentences” by Gail Garinger, he states that “a juvenile doesn’t deserve life in prison because most teens haven’t reached their full maturity”.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit heinous crimes are capable of change, so convicting them as adults and giving them a life sentence doesn't allow them to do so. In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger states the the 79 juveniles in the US who are convicted to a life sentence, are seen as unchangeable and no one cares what becomes of them. But from personal experiences of being a former judge, Garinger had see first hand the juvenile's capacity to turn themselves around. If a juvenile were to be convicted to die in prison, they would be never be given the opportunity to show their change. They should be given an opportunity to show their growth and maturity, but life in prison denies them that. Life in prison denies these young individuals the access to…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniles shouldn't get sentenced to life without parole for committing a crime at a young age. A punishment is necessary but, sentenced to life without parole at a young age is devastating. Why should they even continue to live? They are young and deserve a second chance to rehabilitate. All we do is just throw these kids in prison and forget about the. What these kids need is treatment especially, those raised in violet environments. Sometimes they grow up unaware of what's good or bad. It may not be there fault. I'm not stating that they don't deceive a punishment, what the need is a punishment but also the support of a person.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kentucky, and in many other states as well, after the age of 18 you are considered an adult. This is the level of majority. If someone were to commit a crime at this age or older they would be tried as an adult. Children under the age of 18 cannot be sentenced to death or to life without possibility of parole. This is because children are physically incapable of making mature, responsible, well processed decisions. Opinions from one person to the next differ as there are several reasons concerning juveniles how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases (Southerland). The issue may be more of a debate as some people would say that kids do not have enough reasoning and lack common sense. Others, on the other hand, would say that juveniles have plenty of brains and common sense. There are strong reasons as to why juveniles should not be tried as adults and should not be eligible for life without parole.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More and more juveniles are being incarcerated in adult prisons because of legislation dropping the age juveniles are allowed to be tried as an adult and expanding the list that are considered adult crimes. States vary as to how old and where a juvenile is incarcerated. They may have to wait until a certain age to be transferred to an adult facility or they have to go in ight after sentencing. Sometimes they are in the general population of adults and others they try to keep them in different areas, but it all depends on the state and what their legislature says. Adult prisons do not meet the needs of a developing juvenile therefore putting them at risk for abuse and attempting suicide. Studies have shown that the younger juveniles are…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States, anyone who is charged for committing a crime before the day of their 18th birthday is considered a juvenile and depending on the severity of the case shall be tried as a juvenile. There are some cases; however, where the juvenile justice system should be harder on the juvenile, but in most cases they should not go to an adult prison. There are most certainly some cases in which the juvenile should face the adult justice system, but for petty instances, a juvenile court will suffice. I find it hard to agree that a juvenile convicted for crimes dealing with drugs, alcohol, traffic violations, etc. should be tried in an adult court to receive punishment; however, I do believe that someone who commits rape, murder, kidnapping, or any other major crimes of the sort should be taken to an adult court. “Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time,” is a quote I remember hearing as I was growing up, but I was not taught that it applied to small or minor crimes, but often serious ones involving the harming of another individual. Placing juveniles in adult prisons can cause them to be put in danger, when in reality many of them can be “fixed”…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing is an “imposition of a penalty on a person convicted of a crime” (Schmalleger, 2014). Generally, sentencing is the last thing that occurs when an offender charged with a crime and the trial has ended. During a trial, each side will argue their case in front of a jury (if it is a jury trial); at which time said jury would deliberate and return with a verdict. Once the verdict comes back to the court, a date is set for sentencing. According to our textbook, “most sentencing decisions are made by the judge” (Schmalleger, 2014), there have been exceptions to this rule when there is the possibility of a death sentence at which time the jury may be involved.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles are considered juveniles and should be given juvenile punishment unless it's for something inhumane, such as murder. The United States of America has the highest teen murder rate out of every country. The reason is due to guns being easy to get, the amount of violence they see today, and the T.V. programs shown. The 2012 Supreme Court decision to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder was not a just decision, because teens should know better. They're old enough to know murder is wrong. Our country should give teens the punishment they deserve for the crime they commit. Murder deserves a life sentence whether a juvenile or grown adult.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parole is by definition the practice of early release of a prisoner from imprisonment who will be subject to conditions set by correctional authorities (Siegel 2014). Although there are some compelling cases that argue for the right for juveniles sentenced to life in prison to be eligible for parole, the Supreme Court ruled in 2011 that there is no absolute right or legal right to receive parole (Swarthout v. Cooke and Cate v. Clay). Furthermore, people who argue that abolishing parole would have a negative effect on society do not have to look much further than the State of Virginia, where violent crime was reduced by 23% since they abolished parole. Criminal sentences should be based on justice, and not on a predictive system that is based…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Without Parole

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay will consist of many of my ideas and opinions on sentencing teens to life without parole. I agree that teenagers deserve life without parole for heinous crimes like first and second degree murder depending on whether or not the teenage offender planned out their crimes or the crime was committed in the heat of the moment out of anger or sadness. The teens that are in these programs and have lesser sentences should also only have 2 more chances to mess up and commit more crimes before they are sentenced to life without parole. I also believe that all the teens that planned out their crimes should be where they are in prison. There is another reason why teens commit crimes, It is the undeveloped of their frontal lobes of their brains…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Incarceration

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    5. What is the education level of the juvenile incarcerated in the state of Alabama?…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays