Preview

Liberty of Thought and Discussion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberty of Thought and Discussion
“The liberty of thought and discussion”

By

John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill: John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), British philosopher, economist, great liberal (or libertarian), moral and political theorist, and administrator, was the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century. His views are of continuing significance, and are generally recognized to be among the deepest and certainly the most effective defenses of empiricism and of a liberal political view of society and culture. The overall aim of his philosophy is to develop a positive view of the universe and the place of humans in it, one which contributes to the progress of human knowledge, individual freedom and human well-being. His views are not entirely original, having their roots in the British empiricism of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, and in the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham. But he gave them a new depth, and his formulations were sufficiently articulate to gain for them a continuing influence among a broad public.
Mill's most famous work in social and political philosophy, and still one of the most influential works on human rights and freedom, is his book-length essay entitled On Liberty, which we will now summarize, using Mill's own section headings.

Introduction of the essay:
The main point of this essay is to argue that the only justification for society limiting the liberty of an individual, whether by the government or the force of public opinion, is to prevent harm to others. If the purpose instead is his own good, or some other goal, then only persuasion and non-coercive means can be justified.
Mill believed that an individual had two aspects to his life
1) The individual had two aspects which concerned him alone
2) The social because every individual was also an integral part of society. The actions of the individual may similarly be divided into two categories 1)self-regarding and2)other regarding with regard to actions in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill perceives only one instance in which society is justified in interfering with or limiting the freedoms of its adult members, that being to prevent harm to others. Though Mill would…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout this paper I discussed Mills view on Nature verses Nurture which is he is belief that we are who we are because of our education and upbringing rather than our nature. I also explained how Mill became a supporter of women’s rights. Next, I explained Mills view of Representative Democracy and how to minimize corruption. After that, I discussed how enlightenment plays a role in Mills views on the tyranny of the majority. The fifth topic that was discussed was about the voucher system and how Mill believes it will lead to higher quality education; followed by Mill’s belief that the middle class should be the backbone of politics. Lastly, I have discussed Mill’s views on inheritance. In conclusion, the views of Mill that have been discussed thus far in class include Mills views on nature verses nurture, women in the Victorian Era, representative democracy, tyranny of the majority, voucher system, middle class and inheritance as well as my opinions on some of these…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and a political economist, had an important part in forming liberal thought in the 19th century. Mill published his best-known work, _On Liberty,_ in 1859. This foundational book discusses the concept of liberty. It talks about the nature and the limits of the power performed by society over an individual. The book also deals with the freedom of people to engage in whatever they wish as long as it does not harm other persons.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Feinberg, Joel (1980). Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty. Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.…

    • 2319 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When viewed through the lens of the harm principle, this positive link highlights how important it is to protect diversity to keep society vibrant and dynamic. According to Mill, the advancement of society depends on an individual's capacity to investigate, challenge, and even reject deeply rooted customs and traditions, as long as such actions do not harm others. At some point, real freedom requires striking a delicate balance between the moral obligations to respect others' rights to privacy and the capacity to express one's individuality. Sustaining this balance is essential for individual growth and for creating a flexible, resilient community that benefits from different perspectives. According to Mill, freedom is the ability for people to express themselves freely and the advantages that society as a whole comes from people following their interests, even when those interests do not coincide with established standards.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I understand that his liberty links individual and self-improvement freedom. Therefore, I think his liberal political theory from scientific method on utilitarianism theory. Furthermore, Mill's point of economic philosophy was one of free market depending on his liberalism theory. Mill promoted economic democracy instead of capitalism, a labour cooperate.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is
He
or
Isn’t
He?

 Locating
John
Stuart
Mill 
in
 Ninetee nth
Centur y
Philosophy
 By
Ellen
Melville
 
 This
paper
was
written
for
History
416:
Nineteenth
Century
German
and
European
 Intellectual
History,
taught
by
Professor
Scott
Spector
in
Fall
2008.
 
 
 
 John
Stuart
Mill,
son
of
the
noted
British
philosopher
James
Mill,
is
routinely
 grouped
with
Jeremy
Bentham
as
one
of
the
great
Utilitarian
thinkers
of
the
nineteenth
 century.
He
was
devoted
to
preserving
and
expanding
liberty,
along
with
promoting
a
 limited
government.
However,
his
writings
demonstrate
a
deep
skepticism
regarding
the
 complete
faculty
of
human
reason
as
deified
by
Enlightenment
philosophers
of
the
 eighteenth
century,
as
well
as
his
own
father.
To
Mill,
the
philosophic,
rational
approach,
 and
especially
the
Utilitarian
ideas
espoused
by
Bentham,
is
incomplete
in
that
it
fails
to
 consider
alternative
opinions
or
human
emotions
which
do
not
fit
into
the
image
of
the
 rational,
calculating
man.
To
Mill,
the
Enlightenment
philosophers
became
too
subversive
 in
their
singular
focus
on
the
flaws
of
society.
Moreover,
Mill’s
writing
on
Samuel
Taylor
 Coleridge,
the
noted
Romantic
writer
and
poet,
commends
his
philosophic
reaction
to
the
 Enlightenment.
Finally,
some
of
Mill’s
writing
is
strikingly
similar
to
the
way
Edmund
 Burke,
a
founder
of
conservatism,
responded
to
the
French
Revolution.
Taken
together,
 then,
Mill’s
writings,
though
often
lumped
in
with
the
Utilitarian
philosophers
of
the
 nineteenth
century,
tempers
the
kind
of
thought
which
proceeded
from
the
Enlightenment
 notion
of
reason
with
a
view
of
humanity
that
draws
from
the
Romantics
and
even
some
 strains
of
conservative
thought.

 
 To
begin,
Mill’s
ambivalence
towards
earlier
Utilitarian
premises
seems
to
be,
at…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill (20 May 1806- 8 May 1873) was born in London, England. He was a renowned philosopher best known for his interpretation of utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism is based on the concept that an actions morality should be judged solely upon its resulting universal happiness. Under utilitarianism one should act only in a way that would promote the most good for the most people.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stuart Mill Conformity

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a social theorist in the mid 19th century, John Stuart Mill maintained a Utilitarian outlook. Yet, his enlightened perspective discouraged forced conformity and promoted the misfit. Furthermore, Mill argued that individual liberty is necessary to obtain progress in society.3 This concept remains relevant to the world we see today because, without deviants such as Brenda Berkman and Autherine Lucy, society would stagnate.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins.” said Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the former justice of the American Supreme Court. This famous analogy articulates the scope of liberty suggested by John Stuart Mill and his ‘one very simple principle.’ As the very basis to support his arguments about liberty and its limit, the principle strenuously insists as follows. The only justification for exercising coercive force over an individual is when his actions would otherwise harm any other individual. This Harm Principle or so-called Mill’s Liberty Principle has been implemented to judge whether the state, in a particular situation, is rightfully authorized to interfere with the individual’s free choice and action. Even though…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although most philosophers of liberty have argued that civil liberty worldwide is sacrosanct, closer examinations reveals that such a conclusion depends on the fundamental structure of the organizations responsible for the enforcement of such commitments. The world liberty is many a time used as a cliché. But do we truly know its definition? Do we truly feel civilly liberalized? More importantly, is it freely given to us or do we receive it at a price? Liberty is described as exemption from oppression through imposed authoritative restrictions. Entailing the restricting of government from out of our daily routine.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mills Liberty Summary

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This tyrannical power exists both in the political sphere and outside it. Society itself can become oppressive by limiting individuals and rebellion. Mills writes that the only justification for manipulating an individual’s liberty should be for their self-protection. He argues that even if a law or public opinion is intended for an individual’s…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many differing views on the nature of justice. Some philosophers like John Locke and Frederich Nietzsche advocate the importance of individualism. However, John Stuart Mill strongly urges the vitality of concern for thy neighbor and the use of debate. Within each individual’s ideology I can see the positives. However, when it comes to the nature of justice I think the strong sense of personal goals in individualism and the allocation of debate in Mill’s ideals is what will bring the best for society.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays