Preview

Liberty Leading The People Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberty Leading The People Analysis
Presented in 1830, Eugène Delacroix’s Liberty Leading the People is an oil painting on canvas. Its measurements are 260 by 325 cm or 8.5 by 10.67 ft. This grand size adds significance to the subject matter. Liberty Leading the People is currently being displayed in the Musée du Louvre. Although there is not an official patron, the work was created to acknowledge the demolition of the rule by Louis-Philippe. In essence, it is an admission to celebrate the July Revolution of 1830. With the depiction of an important event and the towering size, Liberty Leading the People is a history painting belonging to the Romantic period that managed to band together realism with a physical allegory. In the renowned style of Romanticism, Delacroix painted …show more content…
Romanticism merges heroism and violence in order to convey the grandeur and intensity needed to promote the intended statement. Delacroix was the leader of the Romantic School in French work and so Liberty Leading the People incorporates all its aspects (Laclotte, 1965). Liberty Leading the People is typical of the Romantic period because it evokes strong emotion, the boldness of colors are excited as they play a part in depicting the violent movement due to the heroic struggle between the French people against their oppressive government. The overall tone is subjective as this historical event was personal to Delacroix, his use of light and tenebrism is contrasted along with the effectiveness of the quick seamless brushstrokes and dynamic chiaroscuro. The chiaroscuro adds movement to the work as there is a need for Liberty and the men to move towards the light of a new era for France and leaving the gloomy dark periods of tyranny and struggle the people of France had to endure. Combined with the emotional quality, chiaroscuro establishes the work as an uprising, as a revolution. Due to the historical context, Liberty Leading the People behaves as a propaganda piece that ultimately celebrated the conquest of the French while glorifying their victory. Ultimately, this work brings together the ideals of liberty that brought forth the Revolution. …show more content…
He learned the use of color by studying the works of Michelangelo and Rubens (Laclotte, 1965). Rubens was a significant inspiration as Delacroix drew motivation from Rubens’ flush palette. He became cultured in the treatment of colors as a way of authenticating the work’s emotion and underlying messages. Taking into account the humanistic view Rubens had, Delacroix aspired to mimic the dramatic feat as human nature won over the forces of anarchy and injustice. Along with the inspiration of other artists, Delacroix’s relationship to Liberty Leading the People as well as his other works are tied into his psychology and what he experienced. As Delacroix witnessed events related to the Revolution, he painted Liberty Leading the People to become a political message of French pride. Delacroix’s works have constant theme of violence, chaotic figures, bold colors, and liberated dynamism. Liberty Leading the People was no different, it was made to invoke reactions. While writing to his brother (a general), Delacroix confessed, "Since I have not fought and conquered for the fatherland I can at least paint on its behalf…I have undertaken a modern subject, а barricade, and if I have not fought for my country, at least I will paint for [Liberty]." Although Delacroix had no interest in politics, his attitude changed as the political crisis in France
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis
    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay
    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Essay

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    humanities task 1 rich revisioin1
    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages

    humanities task 1 rich revisioin1

    Impressionism was an art movement that originated in Paris in the 19th Century, during a time of confusion. The second Industrial revolution and the French society were being undermined by the Francco-Prussian war and the siege of Paris. (mind-edge). Art was loaded with political significance. Rulers used art as a way to portray their ideas of beauty ensuring values which in their eyes made a stable and civilized society. A group of Parisian artists, also thought of as radicals, refused to acknowledge the academicism that dominated French at the time. Despite having multiple submissions rejected by the Salon jury the group decided to exhibit their artwork independently. They did not follow the accepted art, their views of the here and now as well as paintings of commoners were not well received. Art that didn’t follow the classical way was seen as an object of contempt, fear or repression.…

    • 926 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Liberty's First Crisis Book Review
    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Liberty's First Crisis Book Review

    A violation of the United States Constitution could seem like something horrible for both the country and its citizens. Considering the violation was within 15 years of the constitution's creation date, you could tell the government wasn’t strong from when they branched off from England. The constitution was created for the citizens of the United States so they had basic laws to follow and they had special rights. When the Sedition Act was created in 1798 it created anger among the citizens because it stripped them of one of their rights stated in the constitution, freedom of speech. Political figures such as John Adams pushed for this act to be passed because many newspapers and articles had the rights…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ap Us History Guide
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ap Us History Guide

    It is November 9, the Year of Our Lord 1799, and a battered French army begins the arduous climb up the Alps, just as a light snow begins to gently fall, a precursor of the hardship and bone chilling temperatures to come. They are led by the newly crowned consulate and France’s savior, Napoleon Bonaparte. There is a fear that Genoa may fall to Austrians. This fateful journey was captured in a painting by artist, Jacques-Louis David, who was a fervent supporter of the French Revolution. This painting was a gift and peace offering by the Spanish King to Napoleon in 1812, and it captures Napoleon, adorned with an embroidered coat and a deep red cloak, mounted on his steed and pointing up and away from the picture. In the background the French army climbs the steep and twisted path up the rugged terrain of the Alps. A thin layer of new snow lies on the ground and overhead dark and foreboding clouds loom. While the motive of David in his painting Napoleon Crossing the Alps is unclear, his peerless piece of art captures the tender emotions of the viewer with the use of a stark contrast between foreground and background, a diagonal line that appears in several important facets of the painting, and an expression on the face of Napoleon, himself, that calls to the viewer.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Art 101 Week 9 Fianl Project
    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Art 101 Week 9 Fianl Project

    Neoclassicism was associated with an era beginning from the end of the 17th century and went on through the 18th century. “The Neoclassicism art movement came from a combination of the last half of Baroque art to the burgeoning scientific interest in classical Greek and Roman antiquity”, “This new found art of Neoclassicism led to the cause in a rapid growth of collections of antiques” (Sayre, 2010). With Neoclassicism came problems for the artist as to whether an image of a famous person or hero should be painted in traditional or contemporary clothing. The Emperor in His Study at the Tuileries painted by Jacques- Louis David painted Napoleon in his traditional uniform showing his dedication to his work. This work of art was painted with much detail and realism to show his seriousness in the study. David uses eye catching bold colors and the movement of light and darkness that creates a sensational natural light. There is not much emotion in David’s presentation of Napoleon as he stands in his study but the style of art was represented well. The renaissance and courage were indicated through use of the more classical elements of Neoclassicism.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Napoleonic Art Analysis
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleonic Art Analysis

    Napoleon viewed himself as an ambitious and a strong leader. He represented himself as a supreme leader ready to conquer and achieve higher goals for himself and France. this essay explains about this Napoleonic Art. In which I would be describing about its setting, Napoleon’s clothing, actions, and items with symbolic meaning. Furthermore, who painted this painting, his expression, other people in the painting and interesting facts.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Final Project
    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Final Project

    In this essay I will be comparing two well-known paintings, who’s styles were both born of the French Revolution: Resting Girl (Marie-Louise O’Murphy)/Reclining Girl by François Boucher (1751) and Grande Odalisque by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Art Under Napoleon
    • 3055 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Art Under Napoleon

    In 1794 Jacques-Louis David barely escapes death, due to his connections in the revolutionary war. He stood trial and went to prison. After his release he worked hard to reconstitute his career. The highlight of his career is when Napoleon asked Jacques-Louis David to work for him. Of course David accepted. Napoleon knew that David was a very accomplished artist, whom style was Neoclassical-Idealist painter. Napoleon favored painting of the classical times and of the Roman renaissance masters (Kleiner 2006). In reading, we will compare paintings by David, The Oath of Horatti and the Coronation of Napoleon. He also conquered enlightenment, so each subject matter to be of a moral, noble standing and conflict.…

    • 3055 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    "The Death of Marat", a Comparison.
    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "The Death of Marat", a Comparison.

    Jacques Louis David was probably the most influential and leading artist of the neo-classical period and a political propagandist of the French Revolution. His most famous work from this time is “The Death of Marat”. David career was completely tied up with the politic of the day and this is first noticed in his painting “The Oath of The Horatii”. Painted in 1784 “a number of historians have identified an element of pre-revolutionary radicalism and was seen as profoundly anti acadamie.” He soon joined the revolutionary “Jacobin Club” and was then commissioned to paint his first truly political painting “The Tennis Court Oath” which depicts the constitution of the national assembly at the royal tennis courts in the “Chateau of Versailles”. This historical event is said to have been a leading factor of the revolution and in turn the fall of the monarchy.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week Five Art 101 Assignement
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Week Five Art 101 Assignement

    Jacques-Louis David put a lot of detail in this work. I can even see the arrogant nature of Napoleon in his structure and face. This is an ideal work of art with much detail and realism put into it. It was done in bold colors to draw in the eye.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Neoclassical Influence On Art
    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neoclassical Influence On Art

    The French Revolution of the late 18th Century certainly changed the way people look at art, but it also changed how people look at societies and politics. The art during this time praised the past, the Classical past—the era of the Republic of Rome and the demos of Athens. This was essential to express the ideals of the French Revolution to the masses; it was this connection that fueled these art forms.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Art Appreciation - Anger of Achilles Painting
    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Art Appreciation - Anger of Achilles Painting

    David is recognized as one of the most influential French painters in the neoclassical era. He participated in the French Revolution and taught several pupils in the early 19th century. In June 1825, David embarked upon improving the 1819 version of his “Anger of Achilles.” David told his friends, “This painting is what is killing me.” In October of that same year, he died.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Painting Styles
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Painting Styles

    The Neoclassic era of art reflected resurgence in the interest of the Greek and Roman Eras. People of this time were interested in seeing woman as more upstanding. They were also going back to a high moral tone, recognizing civic duty and virtue in people and society as a whole. The art piece The Emperor Napoleon and His Study at the Tuileries by Jacques Louis David is a reflection of this time and the art. The artist, David, was active in the French Revolution of the time and saw Napoleon as a savior of France. The artwork displays the virtue and civic of a Neoclassical piece. It displays Napoleon as a soldier, emperor and administrator, with the highest regards. There is a lot of symbolic symbols and iconography in this work; the uniform, the clock, a sword, campaign maps and rolled papers or the Code of Napoleon. All of these things recall moral rights, since he was regarded so highly by the artist. The Line is classical, simple and ordered. There is linear perspective through spatial depth. The piece is represential. The light in this painting has great contrast and controls what we see. Napoleon and the pieces of iconography are a focal point while being well balanced in the picture.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Romanticism
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Romanticism

    The Second artist we’ll touch on in this period of Romanticism is Francisco Goya, one of my favorites. The Spanish painter was first enthusiastic about Napoleon’s appointment in France, but that quickly turned sour into a bitter hatred for the emperor. Goya detested Napoleon as did most Spaniards during this time, and as a result he painted a scene depicting the horrific events that occurred in Madrid in 1808. The two paintings were broken up into the first portraying the battle and the second showing the executions that had happened the following day. “The Third of May, 1808, is one of the greatest testaments to the horrors of war ever painted.”…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics