Preview

Liberal Reform

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberal Reform
Liberal Government introduce social reforms in the early twentieth century

In the late 19th century the British government practiced the principle of laissez-faire. Laissez faire means the business market are free from tariffs, government subsidies and enforced monopolies [2]. Under the principle of Laissez faire, government only provides simple maintenance of law and order, protect property rights against theft and aggression with regulations [3]. Individuals were responsible for their own decisions, to protect and improve their own lives and welfare.[1] After the general election in 1906, the Liberal welfare reform was introduced between 1906 to 1914, changing the attitude and policies towards the poverty. The liberal reforms for children are, free school meals, school medical inspections, Children ‘s charter act and school clinic. The old age pensions act, labour exchange for the unemployed and national insurance for workers were also carried out eventually within this period of time.[1] The attitude towards the working class shifted from individuality to a more aggregate way .The Liberal reforms changed the economy, politic and social circumstances[1] ,and lead Britain to a more well structuralized and strong country. The reasons of the reforms were, changes in attitude, the Boer War, social reform, political changes and the fear of being overtaken. [4]

The ideology of Laissez faire had assumed how a society should work , free trade, freedom of making a decision in the late 19th century before the liberal social reforms being introduce. The role of government was to make sure and guarantee the freedom of the citizens and market. They provided military forces to regulate the property rights and exchange between parties.[4] The principle idea is to allow citizens from greatest possible freedom. The central idea of this ideology was based on self-help, government was not responsible for the poverty and hardship for their citizens[1] Instead the citizens

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the early years of American history, most political leaders were reluctant to involve the federal government too heavily in the private sector, except in the area of transportation. In general, they accepted the concept of laissez-faire, a doctrine opposing government interference in the economy except to maintain law and order. This attitude started to change during the latter part of the 19th century, when small business, farm, and labor movements began asking the government to intercede on their behalf.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The principle of laissez faire is that the an unobtrusive government is the best government; that the government necessarily only 'maintain domestic tranquillity, defend the people from invasion, and protect them when travelling.' To leave economic workings of the country to the people and let the 'motives for production' be that of the people not the government. Our government took such a stance in its early decades, but as national debt rose, interstate commerce became indomitable, and the economy lost its strength, the need to patch the economy became very important. The government found that the needed patch was much more important than the laissez faire freedom previously given to monopolistic trusts, who were loosing favor with the majority of the lower class, who shared on 50% of the nation's wealth. As an attempt to end all that ailed the country the government began limiting land grants, instituting interstate commerce laws, and passing anti-trust bills, like The Sherman Anti-Trust Bill.…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly the Liberal government introduced a series of reforms for children between 1906-08 because of the emergence of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party. New Liberalism was the belief that if some people to achieve freedom and happiness may need state help if they cannot support themselves. As children have no recourse for helping themselves it was thought that they should be given…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a growing awareness of poverty in Britain, especially in London in early 1900s. According to the research of Charles Booth in London, there were 25% of people that were living under abject poverty and over 35% of people were living under the poverty line of 0.90-1.05 pounds per week for a family with 3 children. The situation was severe and that was not only happening in London, but other cities as well. According to Seebhom Rowntree’s studies, there were 28% of people that lives in York could not afford to buy clothing and food. Social reform was definitely needed. At that time, some other new liberalism were arising, they aimed to give out minimum living standard for needy families. In contrast, the conservative was not doing anything good and the Education Act that did not please the society. As a result, a party that was providing more benefit to citizens and poverty became more successful and gained more voter’s…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals made many social reforms which were not necessarily directly helpful to the individual issues at hand but they did create grounds for the welfare estate to be built upon and highlighted the areas which needed attention for a better minimum quality of life. Areas focused on were free meals and health checks at schools, pensions and insurances. For example, the 1906 School Meals Act allowed children to have a free daily meal. This was effective in 1914 as by then, 14 million were receiving the free meals which duly led to a better economy however the negatives outweighed the positives as the issue with having the act voluntary until 1912 meant that over half of the authorities didn’t provide meals. Furthermore, proving eligibility was very difficult so there were many errors which occurred with the system. Rather similarly, Old Aged Pensioners couldn’t receive their money due to identity proofing issues. Household issues were ignored which was one of the Liberal’s negatives however, this is without taking into account that only so many areas could have been focused on. Although the Liberals never catered for the needs of all people, their reforms managed to always bring some improvement into areas of health, education and the future of citizens, no matter how poor in places they were. The Liberal Social Reforms did improve the lives of the British citizens to some extent, the main achievement being that the existence of the reforms themselves allowed to building of the welfare estate which is a factor that makes Britain as strong as it is today.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of military efficiency on the battlefield and the physical inadequacies of the male populace revealed the situation that an industrialised, non-interventionist state had created. Britain had nothing that could contend with Germany’s exemplary army, Bismarkian network of social insurance which consisted of compulsory sickness and accident insurance and old age pensions, or the well organised educational system. Germany’s newly found economic, military and industrial dominance, provided the British government with evidence that state intervention had great benefits in establishing an efficient nation and this changed the attitude of the state towards the poor rapidly. Between 1906 and 1914 the Liberal Government introduced a large number of reforms to try to reduce poverty: compensation for workers who suffered from injuries that took place in the workplace was introduced in 1906; medical tests for students at schools with free treatment provided if necessary was introduced in 1907; non-contributory pensions for the elderly in 1908 and in 1911, the government introduced the National Insurance Act that provided contributory insurance for workers in time of sickness and unemployment benefit in certain industries…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the nineteenth century the United States seemed to be racing forward in many areas, such as technological advancement, more efficient manufacturing, modernizing transportation, and of course, making money. America was, on the surface, improving greatly; underneath however, there were many problems including corrupt businesses and a growing lower class stricken by poverty. In 1900 to 1920 the Progressive Reform Movement swept the nation; progressive reformers rallied for equal treatment and better working conditions; the federal government adopted regulations that attempted to satisfy the wishes of the reformer; both groups had successes and limitations that ultimately led to an overall beneficial effect on the nation.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 19th century the attitude of the British Governments towards poverty was ‘laissez-faire’ meaning that the government did not interfere with people’s lives. They believed that people were ‘’too lazy’’ to work therefore they should look after themselves. Booth and Rowntree did surveys in the 19th century about the causes of poverty in the British cities such as London and York. Booth and Rowntree were not the main reason for the Liberal Government of 1906-1914 introducing their social welfare since the Boer War was more important as it made the government aware of the unfit population across Britain. However, there were also other factors that had an influence in the reforms introduced such as New Liberalism, Political Advantage, Municipal…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1906-12 when the Liberal Party were in power started the Liberal Reforms, which were several programmes with the intent to help British citizens living in poverty. There is a debate amongst historians whether or not the Liberal Reforms were effective and helped the people living in poverty. The quote from the historian Martin Pugh suggests that the reforms were not introduced to create a welfare state but only focusing on solving specific problems that poor people have faced. There are other interpretations that further support Pugh’s interpretations and there are interpretations that go against Pugh’s interpretation. There were acts of parliament that were trying to help the elderly and the main one was Old Age Pension in 1908 which…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The goals of progressive reforms were limiting the power of big companies, political reform, reducing poverty and reducing the social inequality. Progressive reforms rejected the idea of Social Darwinism and appealed for compulsory education, better housing, better wages, works laws protecting childhood from exploitation. Reforms were not only coping against the urban machines, the spoil system and trusts like the standard oil, but were also for more government intervention to solve social and economic…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Scott (2008) paints an especially revealing picture of the progressive reforms around the beginning of the 20th century. The goal for the progressive reformers at that time was to support the lives of children through various reforms. The juvenile court was only one of the reforms promoted by these progressive reformers. Others included compulsory school attendance laws, restrictions on child labor, and the creation of a child welfare system (Scott, 2008). However, the reformers had a problem. They needed to present to the public a portrait of children as young, innocent, vulnerable, and dependent. This was easier when it came to children working in factories under horrible and unsafe conditions. It was a much harder sell with, say,…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Populist Reforms

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Americans who believed the state legislatures were asking too much from the public had something in common with others who found them too lenient. The citizens who favored heavy taxation and strict monetary policies were frustrated with lawmakers and local officers. They continued to ascribe relief to public officials’ fear of rebellion, but a new orthodoxy began to emerge. Other Americans said public officials should protect the powerless. Some citizens blamed state representatives’ excessive accountability for the revolts. On the other hand, some said that the real reason many farmers had rebelled was that they unable to attain redress at the polls. The most troubling thing about the rising tide of democratic aspiration was that it had spread…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Era Reformers

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From 1900-1920 in the United States of America the reformers of the Progressive Era and the Federal Government were effective bringing about reform dealing with reforms to improve the social disgrace of the working conditions, the enthusiasm to be a nation of self-governed people, and the individual interests of presidents despite limitations in the rulings of court cases, the application of reforms reached, and the varying effectiveness of presidents.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and to achieve this pleasure we need to satisfy our desires. Then in the consumers'…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neo Liberalism

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Neo liberalism is a political ideology which advocates economic liberalization and decreasing the role of the public sector in modern society. Its supporters also argue for free trade and deregulation of the economy. The three most significant developments in the neo liberalist era were; internationalization of trade and finance, increasing power of the transnational corporation and enhanced role of economic institutions like the IMF, WB and the WTO. It has characteristics such as privatization of public enterprises, tax cuts and expansion of the international market. Neo liberalists want minimal state intervention where the focus is on a free market. Equality for them, is restricted to civil and political equality. They are advocates of negative liberty and meritocracy. They differ from Libertarianism in the sense that libertarianism argues for individual freedom of speech and action in a very general way. They want to maximize individual liberty by minimizing the government’s role. Neo liberalists however, concentrate more specifically on economic issues. Libertarians have a simple stance; one can make decisions for him or herself regarding any issue as long as they do not infringe upon someone else’s right to do the same. One of the key therorists for this ideology, Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) disagreed with Keynes and stated that, "The only chance to build a decent world is to improve the general level of wealth via the activities of free markets". For him, more power should be given to the private sector so that more wealth can be generated in the economy with minimal market impurities. Hayek, talked about three main issues. He was against taxation for redistribution. He wanted to end the attention given to specific groups and wanted freedom to pursue goals. His argument was that capitalism and democracy conflict with one another. For him, democracy meant that the government would be more worried about getting votes and protecting special interest…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays