Preview

Legislative History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
887 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legislative History
POL 120

H.R. 394 (112th Congress)
The Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011 (JVCA) also known as the Removal Clarification Act of 2011 was introduced to the United States Congress by Mr. Johnson of Georgia (a representative of (R-TX) Rep. Lamar Smith). It is considered as the embodiment of some of the most far-reaching packages or collection of revisions to the Judicial Code, even more far-reaching than the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990. This bill clarified the jurisdictional statutes pertaining to the operations of the federal courts, and allows for the identification of the right federal and state court in which actions may be brought. Its importance emanated from the belief by judges that the current rules put pressure on them to waste time in determining issues pertaining to jurisdiction while jeopardizing the adjudication of the predisposing litigation. The contents of the bill were founded on recommendations that the United States Judicial Conference made and approved.
Of particular note is that the bill introduces amendments that mainly deal with removal and venue. The act is a revision of the notoriously problematic “separate and independent” claim provision in section 1441(c), underlining the removal or eliminations of civil actions including federal, as well as, unrelated state claims (Hellman 7). The new provision requires remand and severance of claims that are not within the supplemental or original jurisdiction of the district court to protect the rights of the defendant to remove federal claims, and avert the possibility of constitutional problems perceived by some courts (House of Representatives 3). In addition, the Act codifies the “rule of unanimity” created by the judiciary for removal in cases that involve multiple defendants. It offers thirty days to every defendant in which they are supposed to initiate removal; thereby, solving a longstanding conflict present in the lower courts pertaining to the deadline



Cited: Legislative Digest. H.R. 394. Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011. Legislative Digest, 2011. Web http://www.gop.gov/bill/112/1/hr394 Hellman, Arthur. The Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act is Now Law. Jurist, 2011. Web http://jurist.org/forum/2011/12/arthur-hellman-jvca.php House of Representatives. Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011. Web http://www.congress-summary.com/B-112th

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Title and Citation: Dennis v. united States 341 U.S. 494 71 S. CT. 857 (1951)…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kayser Case Analysis

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The American legal system is a complex system with many moving parts. Without the guidance of lawyers, many citizens are left thoroughly confused by the complexities of the court. The court, in both common law and civil law, act as the central means for dispute resolution. The Constitution of the United States of America gives Congress the power to set forth new federal laws, or statutes. With all the many statutes and precedents set in convoluted legal jargon, it is advisable to get professional legal advice, when dealing with matters of the law. With matters, such as personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and proper venue, a case that is improperly…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from americanbar.org Academic database .…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are inherent ambiguities in statutes due to competing legislative interests that require courts to find ways to understand the meaning of statutes. We must use legislative history to find this meaning. In addition, legislators, when creating statutes, interact with other institutions and groups like lobbyists who contribute their own interests, as a result, we see further ambiguity in statutes. When text is ambiguous, judges should use legislative history to find the core meaning. An example of a successful use of legislative history can be found when the Northern Pipeline Construction Co. V Marathon Pipe Line Co. case was used as an example in Congress’ 1984 revision of the Federal Bankruptcy law. The statute contained a phrase “core proceeding.” The statute went on to enumerate…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legislative History Paper

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The use of legislative history to resolve statutory conflicts is often criticized because of three main reasons, but not one reason provides a strong enough argument to completely abandon the use of legislative history. First, critics are afraid that Judges will use legislative history to support their personal opinions…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cjad

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citations: to Support Judgment: Carlisle v. United States, 517 U.S. 416 (1996)Palermo v. United States, 360 U.S. 343 (1959)City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 597 (1997)Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 (1994) Rule of Law:…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legislation

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By working in partnership with professional colleagues, can help to overcome perceived boundaries between services and organisations,…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    III. The History of the case being appealed to the Supreme Court and the decisions of the lower courts…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Process Paper

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    U.S. Courts The Federal Judiciary (n.d.). Understanding The Federal Courts/Civil Cases. Retrieved March 4, 2009, from http://www.uscourts.gov/understand03/content_6_1.html…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legislative Branch Essay

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout American history, the United States of America has had many changes to their legislative system either for the best or the worst. But every change they have made affects things greatly like declaring war or writing and voting on laws. The legislative branch was established by article one of the constitution. This branch is consisted of the House of Representatives and the Senate which together form the United States Congress. The House of Representatives is made up of four hundred and thirty five elected members and there are six non-voting members that represent the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, United States Virgin Islands, Guam and American Samoa. The Speaker of the House is elected by the Representatives…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    *In re Gault(1967) case that determined the constitution requires separate juvenile justice system with certain standard procedures and protections…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pa110 unit 3 assignment

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of [name of state] and the defendant is a citizen of [name of state] and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bandes, S. A. (2009). The Roberts Court and the Future of the Exclusionary Rule.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit was to determine if the plaintiff, David Dunlap Dunlap, had met the burden of proof that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by intentionally discriminating against him under both disparate impact and disparate treatment analyses and whether the TVA appeal to the District Court erred in each of these analyses could be legally supported to reverse their decision FindLaw, 2011).…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays