Preview

Legalization Of Prison Overcrowding In The United States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1702 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legalization Of Prison Overcrowding In The United States
Prison overcrowding has become a major problem in the United States. As per, Issues and Controversies, “The United States has only 5 percent of the world’s population, but holds 25 percent of the world’s prisoners”. (“Mandatory Minimum”) Housing the growing prison population is putting a strain on the federal government’s budget, costing roughly $80 billion a year. (“Mandatory Minimum”) Crime rates are down, but prison populations are a growing concern. In light of these facts, lawmakers need to explore ways of reducing crime that does not involve incarceration, but still protects society. What alternatives to incarceration should be considered and why? Changing times require changing laws. Legalization of marijuana for personal use would …show more content…
The mandatory sentencing guidelines are set by United States Congress and grant prosecutors the power to charge defendants with crimes that allow for longer sentences without regard to what role the defendants played or any background on the cases. Judges are forced to impose the mandatory minimum guidelines to any defendants found guilty. (Glazer 30) According to, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, “About 75 percent of these mandatory sentences are handed down for drug related offenses”. (“Mandatory Minimum”) Opponents of sentencing reform state that the mandatory minimum guidelines should remain because they provide prosecutors the ability to elicit cooperation from low level criminals in order to catch bigger criminals. Prosecutors are able to obtain more guilty pleas from defendants in exchange for not pursuing the crimes that require lengthier sentences. (“Mandatory Minimum”) It might appear to some, that prosecutors are coercing defendants into pleading guilty for crimes that they may in fact be innocent of, for fear of receiving a harsher sentence. These opponents suggest that the longer sentences imposed by these laws are at the heart of the decline in crime and that innocent people don’t confess to crimes that they don’t …show more content…
It’s not enough to just lock people away and hope the problems will go away. The judicial system has to find out what is causing the crime, how best to reform criminals and what to do with those that can’t be reformed. Simply incarcerating a person will not remove the factors that led them down that road to begin with. We need to address poverty, education, social and racial issues. We need to do more than just talk about these issues. Too many people think that these are not their issues, but the truth is that these are everyone’s issues, because they do effect all of us. Crime is a prime example of it affecting everyone. Laws need to be passed to legalize medical and recreational marijuana in all fifty states. The three strike laws, truth in sentencing laws and minimum sentencing guidelines need to be abolished and the power to impose sentences should be returned to the courts. We need to view prisons as a last resort, not a first choice. Prisons should be for violent criminals who pose threats to society. People who are incarcerated should receive whatever services they need to render them functional, and prepare them if they are ever going to be released into society. In lieu of incarceration, we need to implement the decarceration courts that institute drug rehabilitation, mental health care, job placement and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clearly there are several issues of Mandatory Minimum sentences. Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those in support of MMS state that they keep the justice system fair and safe from radical judges and juries who’s views on sentencing will vary greatly for each individual; therefore, actually preventing disparities. MMS are a powerful deterrent that prosecutors can use against the accused to get plea bargains and information on those higher in the drug organizations; however, those opposed say that MMS cases have no advantage when it comes to cooperation rates because most who are arrested are low level offenders who are not affiliated or know little about the organization (Mandatory Minimum sentencing 1). This means it is usually those who are higher up the chain- those who are doing the more serious crimes- that end up getting their sentences cut…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although criminals should pay the consequence for their behavior, it should not mean that they should live in overcrowded prisons. An example of an overcrowded prison is shown in Angola, where the max occupancy was for 800 prisoners, yet they had 1,750 prisoners (Stern, 2006). When this happens, the lack of resources, space, and training from needed officers increases. Therefore, conditions become hazardous and prisoners and officers are at higher risk for diseases such as HIV and Tuberculosis (Stern, 2006). Although society feels safe with criminals locked up, they have to realize that a main purpose for prisons is to help reduce crime by showing prisoners that breaking the law will cause them the loss of freedom. Ultimately, leading those criminals who are able to get out, to come out with a sense of a change behavior. However, the system that puts these women, men, and young people in overcrowded prisons are not even worried about the criminal. Instead, they keep increasing the definition of “crime”, which increase the number of criminals in an ineffective prison…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States accounts for 5% of the world population but has nearly 22% of world prison population. This means that nearly 2 million people are incarcerated, and 1 in 3 black men will go to prison or jail if this trend continues (Amnesty International). Mass Incarceration has been one of the major debate recently in Politics. The politician has been debating on a method to reduce the prison population, and to do that they need to find the cause of it and the different contribution. In recent year, there has been a cut in funding for many states rehabilitation, education and other programs because the costs to accommodate an inmate is escalating upward. At the same time, laws are put in place that put disadvantaged people within the criminal…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered where and how our tax money being spent? We pay taxes for services that we all benefit from as a community. Things like roads, law enforcement, libraries, transportation systems, to live comfortable and safe. However; a very big chunk of that money goes towards prisons and jails. California’s current prison budget is almost $10 billion dollars (Jerrod). Even this sum is not enough to incarcerate all of the offenders. California will need an additional two to four billion dollars to address the overcrowded problem (Hayes). This does not necessarily mean that the crime rate has increased, this just means that politicians need to change the way our prison system works. In the end we are the ones paying for everything. Statistics have shown that the crime rate has decreased over the years but prison population continued to grow (Mayeux). This has started since 1980s when California released a series of strictest mandatory sentencing laws and stringiest parole policies in the nation (Young). These actions have increased prison population by 700 percent since the 1980s (Young). All at the expense of taxpayers which costs us $32 billion dollars yearly nationwide and keeps growing (Kieso). Government cut budgets for education but they keep adding money to correction and rehabilitation sector (Mayeux). Prisons are overcrowded to the point that Supreme Court ordered our state to release 46,000 prisoners because there is just no room for them (Jerrod). Purpose of this proposal is to provide more information on this issue and propose a solution to reduce prison population by reducing the numbers of secondary offenders and going for the root of the problem.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nobody will disagree with this fact; the prison system in the United States is overcrowded. The population is constantly on the rise and doesn’t show any signs of stopping. The news is constantly reporting that our prisons and local jails are overtaxed and they need more money to build more space to accommodate their ever increasing population. There is controversy, however, when it comes to the type of prisoners that contribute to this issue. It is a cold hard fact that the law imprisons nonviolent drug offenders. It is, however, a matter of opinion if this law works to rehabilitate these offenders. Do they get rehabilitated or do they “serve their time” only to come out and offend again, ending up right back where they started? The rehabilitation process that the prisons claim to offer simply does not work. There must be some other way to “punish” this group of people. This type of socialization cannot possibly be beneficial to the 18 year old boy who gets popped with a joint. The first time offender is almost certainly doomed if changes are not on the horizon. We must then contemplate the three strike law. If this law worked, then surely our prison population would not be a topic for debate. Former inmates would have an education and be able to get jobs upon their release, but this just…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory Minimum sentencing usually is defined when a judge is determined to deliver a fixed amount of years in prison to an individual for a convicted crime. Most mandatory minimum sentences apply to drug offenses but it also applies to other crimes, like having an unlicensed gun, fraud, and many others. Mandatory Minimum legislature contributes to the truth that America has a systematic problem in the increase of mass incarceration and men of color are being deprived of their natural rights. The mandatory minimum sentence doesn’t resolve the dilemma of crime. American nonviolent drug offenses should be prosecuted, but Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be eradicated.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rising cost of overcrowded corrections and potential solutions are discussed. Alternatives to incarcerations such as probation, house arrest and fines are just a few of the topics explored. Understanding the problems with the system will help to alleviate the cost along with the correct level of justice associated with crime.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    America’s prisons have a major importance in modern society. They are a huge contributing factor to the safety of our country and allow for proper and humane punishment for those who commit crimes. While America’s streets continue to be plagued by crime and dangerous people, prisons help significantly in decreasing the crime rate and removing those people from society in order to create a safer place for people to live. Although there are many pros that come with prisons, a handful of cons come with them as well, which allow for arguments to rise about whether prisons should be allowed in America or not. Prisons are a necessity in modern society that punishes and rehabilitates those who commit crimes with the purpose of protecting…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prisons are already filled beyond maximum capacity, and we continue to keep incarcerating more people. What can be done to end the problem of prison overcrowding and maintain the safety of the public? I chose this topic because I wanted to shine a light on what I consider to be an injustice. I believe that the criminal justice system needs a complete overhaul. When I chose this topic, I wasn’t fully aware of the mandatory sentencing guidelines or how harsh they were. I always believed that judges had more leeway in deciding sentencing. Originally, I hadn’t even considered the possibility of criminal corporal punishment, because I believed it was cruel and something that other less civilized countries would do, not America. I believe that the prison overcrowding problem can be resolved by changing our laws regarding nonviolent offenders, abolishing the mandatory sentencing guidelines and using alternative solutions that do not involve incarceration.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.(2014), “mandatory sentencing was passed in the 1980s, by U.S. Congress and many state representing two bodies with yearnings that it will the settled jail terms to those arraigned particular infringement, much of the time drug offense”. Rather, this cruel sentencing adversely, packing the penitentiaries with low-level transgressors at a higher cost to taxpayers. As indicated by Paul Larkin and Evan Bernick (2014), “mandatory minimum sentences have not eliminated sentencing disparities because they have not eliminated sentencing discretion; they have merely shifted…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justice System Failing

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Senator Jim Webb writes in Clear and Frost’s article, “ America’s Criminal Justice System has deteriorated to the point that it is a national disgrace.” And that is the truth. The criminal justice system has many flaws that need to be fixed. There are several issues that need to be handled and dealt with properly. Tweaks need to be made to ensure that criminals are sentenced properly. But the way that criminals are picked out and failed by the system is preposterous. Although the Justice System establishes rules and makes sense out of chaos, the justice system needs reform because 25% of the nation is incarcerated, there are more drug users than murderers or serial offenders, and there are private prisons that…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the mid-1980s drug offenses increased primarily due to the pressure put on by the war on drugs (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). This has contributed to overcrowding of prisons across America. In order to ease the overcrowding in prisons, rehabilitation through court sentenced drug treatment programs is a practical and economical alternative. Assigning offenders to applicable drug treatment programs would decrease overcrowding caused by drug offenses, lower recidivism rates, and provide savings for the criminal justice system.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Increased penalties and incarceration are the main solutions of crime prevention for advocates who believe that drugs should be prohibited. Two main reasons for this are its deterrent effects and social harm factors (Levitt, 1996, Weatherburn, 2014). Levitt (1996), at the height of rapidly increasing speeds of incarceration writes that increased prison population is a threat to deter people from engaging in criminal acts due to an increased threat of imprisonment. Also, incapacitation will be a benefit to society as criminals are unable to commit crimes while incarcerated (1996). His study argues that for each prisoner released as a result of prison overcrowding, it is associated with an increase of fifteen crimes per year (1996). Conversely,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays