Preview

Legal Systems: Foundations Of Criminal Justice System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Systems: Foundations Of Criminal Justice System
Elizabeth Prest
Foundations of Criminal Justice Systems: CRJS101 - 1404A – 09
Unit3 - Individual Project
September 8, 2014

Here in the United States the law is derived into four sections. These four sources are constitutional law, statutory, administrative regulatory law, stare decisis, and the common law. These four laws combined makes criminal law. Constitutional law consists of state, namely, executive, legislature, and judiciary branches of government. Statutory laws are subordinate to the higher constitutional laws of the land. Statutes may originate with national, state legislatures or local municipalities. However, stare decisis, the principle that similar cases should be decided according to consistent principled rules so that
…show more content…
A common-law crime is one punishable under common law, as distinguished from crimes specified by statute. In many U.S. jurisdictions, including some in which comprehensive criminal statutes have been enacted, the common law in relation to crimes and criminal procedure has been recognized by the courts as in force, except insofar as it has been abrogated or repealed, expressly or impliedly, by statute. Thus the state may prosecute crimes that were indictable at common law even though they may not be denominated as such or be provided for by statute.
Common types of warrants in criminal cases include arrest warrants and search warrants. An arrest warrant is usually designed to detain a person who is suspected of committing a specific crime. By and large, an arrest warrant is granted when probable cause supports that a crime has been committed by the person listed in the warrant. If a defendant fails to make an initial appearance in court after a citation has been issued, the court may issue an arrest
…show more content…
While many factors contribute to a police officer’s level of authority in a given situation, probable cause requires facts or evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a suspect has committed a crime. The precise meaning of probable cause and how it is met can be explained as: The total information of what police have heard, known or observed as trained officers. Probable cause will not lie down unless the facts supporting the warrant are asserted by the officer as true to the best of his or her knowledge. The officers have the right to search in the case of plain-view doctrine. It can be understood with an example; if an officer goes to a doctor for assistance or medical help and during the process, he sees drugs; in this situation, he can legally forfeit him and make an arrest at the moment. The plain view doctrine applies under legal circumstances and in the places where the police officers have a valid right. All these searchers and reasons are persuasive and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, these circumstances must require immediate action. Police officers can enter a home without a warrant to render emergency assistance to an occupant that is injured, to protect them from imminent injury, and if they have a reasonable belief that the person within the house is in need of immediate aid. If the delay in waiting for a search warrant would endanger the police officers lives or the lives of others. Another example of a warrantless search would be when there is sufficient justification that evidence is going to be destroyed. If the police officer is pursuing a suspect from a just-committed crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death and/or serious bodily injury and the suspect a private residence, the police officer may enter without a warrant. They may also enter if it is to capture a person who retreats inside when lawfully attempted to detain or arrest the suspect while they are in a public place. If the police officer reasonably believes that a burglar, vandal, arsonist, or other criminal is within private premises committing or attempting to commit a property crime that may result in substantial loss or damage, they do not need to wait for a warrant to enter and prevent or minimize the loss (Rutledge,…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they suspect you are carrying; Illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property, something that can be used to commit a crime e.g. a crowbar.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Probable Cause and Time to Secure a Warrant: Are the police at fault if, after obtaining evidence sufficient to establish probable cause to search, they do not seek a warrant, but instead knock on the door to speak with the occupant or obtain consent to search? No. This approach unjustifiably interferes with legitimate the police tactics. There are many entirely proper reasons why the police may not want to seek a search warrant as soon as the minimum evidence needed to establish probable cause is…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have already gone over the exclusionary rules associated with unwarranted searches and seizures, now we need to look at warranted searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment requires that no warrants be issued unless based on probable cause by a sworn Affirmation, this applies to all warrants whether they are for search or seizure. In order to understand the concept behind warrants, we must also understand probable cause. The Supreme Court has defined probable cause as more than mere suspicion. The facts an officer is acting upon must be enough to convince the average person that the suspect committed or is committing the offense being investigated. (Worrall, 2012) In the academy they stressed this as less than beyond a reasonable doubt, but more than a hunch; which leaves a large area in between.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order for an officer to search a person they must have some sort of reason for doing so. This reason is also known as probable cause. The officer must have some sort of feeling that the individual that they want to search may be carrying something that could cause harm to that person or to the officer doing the search.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Probable Cause

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In everyday cases there are several factors included that must be met for the justice process to be effectively worked out. Probable cause is “ the minimum standard necessary for an arrest under any circumstances.” (Schmalleger,2012). Probable cause is facts that lead to a warrant, arrest, or search. This is the first step in receiving a warrant to search a suspects home, or car. Certain standards are required when coming up with probable cause. There is a certain process by which a warrant is issued, and all officers must obey all suspects…

    • 2409 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of search warrants, probable cause, and searches go hand in hand as part of the legal system. Each step makes the next step part of the process. This process gives us certain civil liberties and are all rooted in the 4th Amendment of the Constitution of The United State of America. The following information will interpret, define, and support the legal justification of warrants, probable cause, and searches.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Circumstances which should suggest to a police officer that a search warrant is not valid include:…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A search warrant must always be based on probable cause. We can define probable cause by facts or circumstances that would lead a person to believe that the place needs to be searched for important pieces of evidence to be found (Swanson 35). The probable cause is established by what is called a written affidavit prepared by the law enforcement officer or investigator. In the affidavit, the officer states all known facts and circumstances involving the suspects and items that are expected to be found. An affidavit contains 3 main parts that need to be described: the person, the property, and the facts. The search warrant must always describe in particular the place that is being searched. The description must be detailed enough to where the place being searched can easily be distinguished from any other place. It can be very easy to confuse one property with another; this is why it is extremely important for the description of the building to be very detailed and accurate.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police have the power to stop, detain and search any person if there is ‘reasonable…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probable cause: sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime. Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the belief the items were evidence of a crime. Probable cause in my understanding means that a police officer cannot accuse you of a crime that they are not able to prove. If you are pulled over due to being suspected of drunk driving, they have to give you sobriety tests or see open containers in order to give you a ticket or take you into custody. They just can’t see you swerve while driving and take you to jail without proof.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probable cause is one of the fundamental protections built into the criminal justice system by the founding generation of the United States. Probable cause is the standard by which an officer or agent of the law has the grounds to obtain a…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays