Preview

Legal Memo To Martha Mckinley: Legal Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Memo To Martha Mckinley: Legal Case
Martha McKinley: Legal Memo
Kaplan University
Unit # 8
Iraida

TO: Professor Howard
FROM: Iraida
RE: Martha McKinley
DATE: October 15, 2013

QUESTION PRESENTED
Does Ted McKinley, Martha’s father, have a right to file suit against the CES for punishing his daughter without a fair trial?
SHORT ANSWER
Yes. Ted McKinley has the right to file suit against the CES board. There are many issues present, but most importantly, the CES violated the Sixth Amendment when punishing Martha without a fair trial.
FACTS:
Congress passed a statute entitled the Cell Phone Education Regulation Act (CPERA) to confront the possession and use of cellular phones by students in
…show more content…
The rules also permitted random searches to take place. A hidden provision in the regulation allowed for enforcement officials to target their investigations more towards female students than male students, since studies had shown that females talk on cellular phones more often than males.
Penalties for violating CES rules and regulations include the following: for a first offense, no hearing is held and the student receives a written warning; for a second offense, a hearing conducted by school officials is held and an automatic suspension is handed down; for a third offense, a full hearing is held by a board for the CES, after which a guilty finding results in expulsion, arrest, and incarceration for 30 days. School officials are also permitted, under the regulations, to permanently keep any cellular phones they confiscate.
A group of parents has come to the office where you work outraged by the substance of these rules and regulations. They are also upset by the fact that no notice was given or hearings held prior to the enactment of the rules and regulations. Finally, they do not think it was permissible for Congress to delegate to this agency the power to enforce regulations of this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: Ms. Deters, the plaintiff, sued Equifax, the defendant, in the United States District Court for the district of Kansas after being sexually harassed on several different occasions by three different co-workers and also the original male supervisor. Violating Title VII, prohibiting discrimination of employees based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. Ms. Deters filed multiple complaints on the daily sexual harassment that had taken place at the office. Mr. Taylor indicated he would handle the sexual harassment, him being the highest managerial position in the office. Mr. Taylor was also designated by Equifax to enact its human resource policies. The courts entry of judgment in the favor of the employee denied the defendants motion on the issue of punitive damages. However, Equifax did not agree with the decision of the court and wanted a judgment as a mater of law de novo. Equifax litigates that the evidence was not in support of the punitive damages.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 23, 1957, police officers in a Cleveland, Ohio suburb received information that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal betting equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp,so the police went to her home and she refused their entrance without a warrant, several hours later the police arrive in numbers and force their way in, when asked about their warrant an officer flashed Mapp a piece paper then arrested her before she could read it. The police did. It find the terror suspect but did find a chest containing pornographic materials and pictures which are in violation of an Ohio law of possession of obscene materials, at the trial the warrant was never presented to Mapp or her lawyer and Mapp was found guilty upon charges. They then took the case to the Ohio Supreme Court and claimed the eve deuce was taken illegally and that illegal evidence shouldn't be able to be used in court, the verdict was that the officers took it from the trunk peacefully so it was legal, then Mapp took the case to the Supreme Court claiming that her rights granted to her by the 4th amendment had been violated.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sheppard v. Maxwell, was a United States Supreme Court case that examined the rights of freedom of the press as outlined in the 1st Amendment when weighed against a defendant's right to a fair trial as required by the 6th Amendment. In particular, the court sought to determine whether or not the defendant was denied fair trial for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trial judge's failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: Did the State of Illinois violate the Equal Protection Clause when it denied Peter Stanley a hearing on his fitness to keep his children?…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In 1896 Henry Williams, a black man was indicted for murder by a grand jury composed entirely of white men in Washington County, Mississippi. An all-white petit jury subsequently convicted him and imposed a death sentence. The defendant argued that both the indictment and trial violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the laws of the state Mississippi were discriminatory and thus, disqualified blacks from serving on a jury.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner V Mandalay

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No, the lower court granted summary judgment for the stadium owner and held that there was no duty by the owner to protect Mrs. Turner from…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tim Masters Case

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Peggy Hettrick, I hold ultimate authority. I must responsible for assuring the rights of Tim Masters, and the interest of the public. I have to determine rather or not the evidence in the brought against Tim Masters was obtained lawfully and that the prosecution did not violate any of Tim’s rights in the process. It is also my job to determine rather or not the prosecutor has established that Tim masters is guilty under the code of the law.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment I, article ). If the press causes the jury to be prejudiced, that can create an unfair trial, which violates the 6th Amendment. The Sheppard v. Maxwell case challenged the freedom of the press Marilyn Sheppard was murdered in her bedroom, on the usually joyous July 4th. This shook the small town of Bay Village, Ohio. Dr. Samuel Sheppard, her husband, was immediately suspected. In front of hundreds of reporters, photographers, and curious townspeople, Sheppard was questioned about the murder. His attorney was thrown out of the hearing for passionately protesting the conditions of the proceedings. Dr. Sheppard was indicted for the murder based on the results of the hearing. He was arrested and charged on July 30. Almost instantly, the case became front page news. The trial was disrupted by all of the reporters and photographers crammed into the room. In fact, reporters were seated so close to Sheppard and his lawyer that they could not speak without the press hearing as well. From both sides of the case, the officers and attorneys leaked information to the reporters. This ended up being very harmful to Sheppard, because the jury had access to the information of the reporters. Twice, Sheppard’s attorneys filed motions for a change of location, given the atmosphere, but both attempts were…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dog Bite Memo

    • 3149 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Under the Georgia false imprisonment statute, whether Charlene Miller has a valid claim against the Center for Independent Performers and Artists (CIPA) when the security guards (1) searched Charlene suspecting her of having stolen a CD; and (2) confiscated the iPhone for inspection suspecting her illegal recording?…

    • 3149 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison brief

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is asking the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus a correct legal course of action?…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the search engine Google. I found an article from the journal.com asking “Are Cell Phone Bans Worth the Trouble. In this particular school, if students were caught on their technology devices the first time they would have to pay a fee of $15 to get their cell phones back or convince a parent to come and pick it up. The second time the student is caught on their device a parent has to come and pick up the phone and also pay the fee. According to the article 32% of school districts had the same policy for personal technology devices. Although in 2010 51% of principals said they were going to allow the use of personal devices in school. In the particular school the principal came to agree with the 51% of the principals allowing students…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Civilrights.org. (2002, April 13). Justice on trial. Washington, DC: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights/Leadership Conference on Civil RightsEducation Fund. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from Civilrights.org Web site: http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/cj/…

    • 2426 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of cell phones, smart phones or iPhones is prohibited in the classroom. This includes…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Realistically, however, colleges will have to develop codes of conduct that are less stringent. While there may be no consensus with regard to the matter of policy, there is general agreement that the marriage of the college students and cell phone technology is here to stay for both social and practical reasons” (Gilroy 29).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jimmy Maddox was convicted of rape in a Georgia state court and sentenced to life imprisonment. Having unsuccessfully pursued his direct appeal and the state post-conviction remedy, Maddox filed a federal habeas corpus petition alleging prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland. There are four types of situations in which the Brady doctrine applies; the prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a specific defense request, the prosecutor has not disclosed information despite a general defense request for all exculpatory information or without any defense request at all, the prosecutor knows or should know that the conviction is based on false evidence and or the prosecutor fails to disclose purely impeaching evidence not concerning a substantive issue, in the absence of a specific defense request.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays