Possible introduction - A lot of questions were raised about the effects of everyone being allowed to carry guns. The rise of crime and murder are certain areas to think about being most impacted by the state carrying side arms. We also need to ask ourselves, how often are guns used for protection? Is the law helping citizens protect their family or is the law just making it easier to commit murder?…
In light of the recent shootings across the United States, the topic of gun control has flared up and been tossed around by lobbyists, politicians, news journalists and the public. There have been discussions over whether gun control laws cost or save lives. Gun control has become an issue throughout the world with each country exercising its right to regulate firearms between their borders. American economist and social theorist Thomas Sowell deliberates the topic in a recent journal entry in the Denton Record Chronicle.…
The view on this paper will be from a pro-gun stand point providing valid points of view from the individual’s right to own guns to protect themselves and how instilling strict gun laws actually do not lessen gun crimes as anti-gun advocates proclaim.…
According to the Coalition for Gun Control, last year a total of 291 people were killed by handguns in Australia, Sweden, Great Britain, Japan, and Switzerland. In the United States more than 24,000 people will be killed by the end of this year. So what is the big difference between the U.S. and these other countries? In these other countries it nearly impossible to buy any kind of gun. In these countries there are no gun shows. In these countries you can't buy a gun at a pawnshop or your local Wal-Mart. These countries have strict gun laws and are all about gun control. In this paper I will discus the correct interpretation of the Second Amendment, why guns are such a problem in the U.S., and why guns are more likely to kill a friend instead of a foe.…
Firearms are often used to defend and protect citizens. Banning the use of firearms will not better our society because crime rates will stay the same or even decrease, gun control laws may not follow through, and people still use guns to provide food for their families. The right to private property (guns) is not absolute in the constitution. Citizen’s right to own and bear arms must be balanced by a greater need for safety (Warfel, 2000). The idea of taking firearms away to make the nation safer is understood but justified. It is said that half of all US households own at least one gun and roughly 30,000 people die yearly from a gunshot wound (2013). However, firearm incidents have declined 40% since 1992. In the book “More guns, less crime” by Dr. John R. Lott, he states in the 1990s more guns were produced and bought while murder rates and accidental gun deaths decreased by 40% (Lott, 1997). This demonstrates that guns help lower crime rates.…
According to the 2010 statistics presented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, (UNODC,) in Great Britain, Sweden, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, and Japan, a total of 294 people were murdered by firearms. In the United States more than 22,000 people were murdered by firearms by the end of the year. The difference that exists among these countries and The United States is that in these countries is very difficult to buy a firearm. In fact these countries have rigorous gun laws. In contrast in the United States people can buy a firearm in a pawnshop, in Wal-Mart, online, arm shows, newspapers ads, Craigslist, almost anywhere. In this essay,…
Approximately 30,000 people die a year because of guns when they are used in both self defense and murder. Many people argue whether restrictions on guns should be enacted or repealed. Tensions have grown high on both sides of the issue making it a hot topic in our country today. Many people cast their votes in the last election based on their feelings about this very issue. The divide among Americans when it comes to gun control is large, spanning from those who want strict regulation, including an outright ban on all firearms, to those who want complete legalization of individual gun ownership. Guns can be used for killing or protection, so it is important to examine all…
In America there are two strong sides that are for and against the owning of firearms. I will refer to the side that is for firearms as the pro-gun side and antigun side for those who oppose firearms. In this paper I will discuss how firearms affect our lives here in America. I will inform you what a firearm is and how they are used. I will discuss whether owning a firearm is ever morally permissible. I hope that by the end of this paper that you will be able make your own decision on this topic and join the side that you think is right.…
Gun control is by far one of the most controversial subjects in the entire world. Whether gun control is good or bad is debatable, though with statistics from two very different countries we will be able to form an opinion and have a better understanding of gun controls effectiveness. In evaluating and studying The United States and The United Kingdom, both being completely opposite from one another in view of Gun control we will be able to see these two different sides. The U.S having a unrestricted gun policy and U.K having a much more restrictive gun policy, we will discover the overall ideological view on culture and political standpoint.…
Imagine a family peacefully enjoying their time together one evening safe in their house until a robber breaks into the house and threatens to do terrible things to the family but, someone in the household is wielding a firearm and deters the robber. Now imagine the same scenario as before but how different the outcome might have been if firearm were not present and the family was subject to the cruelty of the robber and how dreadful that might be. The ownership of firearms in the United States has long been a part of the history for this country and after over a 200 year presence of guns in America, some are calling for a transformation of what our founding fathers set forth and signed in the year 1787. This can be attributed to the recent…
Gun control laws have been surrounded by controversy since The Bill of Rights, including the Second amendment was passed in the congress. "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," the founders wrote. Until recently there was considerable argument over just what the founders intended by their words. Did they mean to provide only for armed units to protect us from invasion, or did they mean that each individual has a right to a gun? However, in the District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling upholding the right of individuals to bear arms for hunting and for self-defense. In the light of the Supreme Court’s hearing, the recent mass shooting incidents and growing gun related deaths across the country have called for changes and introduction of new gun related laws i.e. gun control laws to curb gun violence. In this paper I will review five main positions on the issue of gun violence in United States. First, there are those who argue that the only way to reduce gun related deaths is by making stricter gun control laws and enforcing new ones. These people believe gun related deaths can be reduced significantly by reducing the number of guns in the hands of the citizens. Second, this group argues that gun control laws are not effective means to curb gun related deaths. They argue that focus must increase crime control rather than gun control. They say less guns will not help bring the gun violence figures down. They argue for different laws to curb gun violence such as gun trafficking law. Third, this group argues that more guns will reduce gun violence. They say as gun ownership increases, criminals will be more cautious to attack and hence reducing gun related deaths. Forth, theses are the people who argue that instead of proposing new laws, whether it is to increase or to…
With the increase of mass shootings in America, many propositions have been suggested as ways to prevent or lessen the amount of these attacks with the most prevalent being to ban or reduce access to guns. America has the highest amount of gun related deaths each year in the world. “In Germany 381, in France 255, in Canada 165 in the United Kingdom 68, in Australia 65, in Japan 39 and in the United States, 11,127” (Moore Michael, 51:15-51:48). America has 270 to 310 million guns, which is 88.8 to every 100 people in America, which is the highest total and per capita number in the world (ProCon). The correlation between the number of people owning and dying from guns in the United States cannot be denied. However, the Second Amendment of the…
2 Our founding father understood that “Guns in the possession of citizens are an added protection against government tyranny” (Messerli) and the second amendment was written for this reason and is a driving factor to the creation and beliefs of American government. 3 Throughout history dictators and totalitarian regimes have taken away their citizens right to bear arms. 4 Mao Tse Tung said “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” (Mao Tse Tung) and China’s history is an example given where guns were used to change China’s government and now private citizen gun ownership is illegal. 5 In addition to politics, the deterrent effect on criminals by allowing private gun ownership is often argued as a form of protection for the individual. 6 Only a small percentage of law abiding citizens actually use guns “but the few are enough to change the odds against predatory criminals” (Cox). 7 Because criminals are less likely to perform a crime if it endangers their life or harm them, the potential of facing a gun themselves deters the would-be criminal. 8 Gun control laws are seen as the loss of an individual’s ability to protect themselves against political tyranny or…
The current issue with gun control demonstrates continued tension as the government debates whether political gun control will do more damage than good. Recent public shootings and massacres have left the nation in terror of the possibilities. The idea of political gun control by a centralized power, or the government, would have its repercussions as they would most likely raise the cost of guns. Never the less, if they increase regulations it could cost the government a lot of money, and an unknown amount of lives. On the other hand, a decentralized power implies that an individual who owns a gun is responsible for how they handle it, and they face charges and consequences for what they do. Tension increases because people have the right to…
"You can't argue with the fact that Kennesaw has the lowest crime rate of any city our size in the country," said Church, who owns a denture-making company in Kennesaw.…