Preview

Lefebvre's Bourgeoisie Revolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
133 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lefebvre's Bourgeoisie Revolution
Lefebvre argues that on a fundamental level, “It was the aristocracy that precipitated the Revolution by forcing the king to call the Estates – General” but goes on to iterate that “the issue was not so much political in character as social; for the transformation of the monarchy into a constitutional government was a reform on which nobles and the bourgeoisie agreed”. He states that although the nobility (Second Estate) and the bourgeoisie (Third Estate) were in accordance regarding the abolition of the absolutist Bourbon monarchy of the Ancien Regime, the insistence of the nobility to maintain its concessions and social stature led to the rise of the bourgeoisie and the ‘bourgeoisie revolution’ characteristic of Lefebvre’s interpretation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the revolution, the bourgeoisie, or the wealthier and working part of the middle class, belonged to the Third Estate. The Third Estate, out of the Estates, had the almost no rights and the largest tax burden. However, after the new National Assembly issued the Declaration of the Rights of Man and drafted a new constitution for France, the nobility was eliminated and the bourgeoisie gained a massive amount of political power.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were numerous causes to justify The French Revolution. There existed problems inside France’s government, society, and economy. Most of these problems were ultimately experienced by the third estate, or the middle class. The third estate was then educated on a better way to live by the results of the Enlightenment philosophers and their philosophies. Certain conditions also led to the revolution, on top of its causes. Living conditions and representation in government are two examples. It is undeniable that the people of the third estate were correct in their campaign for change.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOCIAL: Transcript of The Lasting Social Effects of the French Revolution as evide The Lasting Social Effects of the French Revolution as evident in Mid 19th-Century France Bryttan, Mary, Daniel Social Structure before the French Revolution Large class differences between the rich and the poor French leaders were known to be very extravagant and constantly found themselves in debt The French Revolution Abolished the feudal system and monarchy of France Peasants burned and pillaged many places Mass murder of nobles and noble sympathizers Long Lasting Effects Changed the social structure beginning with the feudal system and monarchy Bourgeois and land owning classes emerged as dominant classes Caused widespread reform in other monarchies Gave…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The upper bourgeoisie had more in common with the nobility, the former’s wealth often lead them to run within the same circles. While the bourgeoisie would resent the nobility for their exclusivity and political power, there was still a sense of aspiration towards them. There were frequent inter-marriages between the two, further complicating the social structure in terms of power. The bourgeoisie grew in power and influence of rising commerce and finance, which somewhat threatened the status of the nobility. As social mobility and moveable wealth expanded, privilege was on the increase and there were more, and perhaps often embittering, divisions in society. While the nobility utilized their easily acquired privileges of office, the bourgeoisie was beginning to feel more self-confident in its own privileges and merits. This amount of tension within the French social classes, along with an Enlightened society conflicting against their Absolute leader Louis XVI, lead to the infamous social and political revolution of 1789. To say that the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy caused the French Revolution would be inaccurate as to dismiss many other contributing factors. However there is no doubt the French Revolution marked a major transitional stage for the rise of the bourgeoisie into modern…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his address to the Estates General, King Louis XVI shows no sympathy for the Third Estate’s rebellious actions. Angry because they have a disproportionately low representation in government — a violation of their natural rights — the Bourgeois and peasants had begun to make plans for rebellion. In an attempt to maintain his absolute power, he delivers the speech to suppress the growing opposition’s desire for liberty, equality, and fraternity, ideas originating from the Enlightenment. His speech is an example of the extensisteps governments were willing to take to bury revolutions and hold on to power. These plans failed, and commoners overthrew monarchies and established their desired form of government. In France’s case, this was (after a series of temporary governments), a constitutional monarchy whereas before it was a divine-right monarchy. King Louis XVI’s actions are very similar to the Ottoman Empire’s response to industrialization. Just like his downfall was failure to adapt to the times — as governments were clearly becoming less autonomous — so too was it the Ottomans. They failed to embrace industrialization, instead instituting a series of muddled-down reforms that were not nearly enough to prevent their fall.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This idea of social relations is what Lefebvre sees as the crucial cause of the Revolution: the conflict between the long-standing aristocracy—with their exclusion from political power but still-existing seat at the top of the social hierarchy due merely to birth—and the newly-forming bourgeoisie—who held economic power through supplying money to the monarchy but were continuously excluded from the legal structure (1-2). “Such a discrepancy never lasts forever” (2) and the Revolution would bring about the transformation to restore “harmony between fact and law” (2). The battle between the economic and legal powers started the Revolution, but it would take the urban workers and peasants to bring about the true meaning of liberty and equality for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oka Conflict Analysis

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the people or the nation disagree, or when their nationalist loyalties lead them to pursue contending goals, an attitude of reconciliation can bring them together and enable them to coexist in peace. But when two contending loyalties cannot achieve reconciliation, the outcome can be serious. The inability to resolve the differences may lead to damaging political struggles and even outright war. The French Revolution is an example of the conflicts that can occur due to the divisions of social classes. The French society was divided into three estates of the Ancien Regime: the First Estate (the Roman Catholic clergy), the Second Estate (the nobility), and the Third Estate (serfs and the rest of population). By the 18th century, the bourgeoisie, the middle class who earned wealth through trade, demanded a change to the ancien regime due to the increase of education and literacy. The bourgeoisie were unsatisfied with the economic, legal, and political limitations imposed on them and wanted a change to the outdated political structure, they wanted a voice that is more closely reflected on their numbers. When the government were unable to agree on a solution, many people were beginning to question the absolute power of the monarchy. The king, Louis XVI, called the representatives of the three estates to discuss political change, but little was settled during these meetings, due to the…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Great Cat Massacre

    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages

    pages attempt to capture everything about the city. 107-8, how would we organize a “complete” picture of our town? This description of Montpellier, like Dickens, constructed and colored and structured by its author. To get at this 18th century understanding, we need to look more at “the modes of description than the objects described.” I.e. how did he order his world? What categories did he use to sort and describe? 109. Bourgeois. What does it mean? In France, interpretation is Marxist – widened as bourgeois ideology penetrates, is adopted, becomes dominant ideology driving French Revolution. This model assumes 3 tiered model of causality: economic to social to cultural change. 111. In this model, econ. Bourgeois become the most important element. 111. Only problem. Labrousse other annals historians, couldn’t find the bourgeois. At least, in the Marxist sense of manufacturers. 112. So who thought “bourgeois” if no manufacturers? Traditional elite of provincial elite of state officials, doctors and lawyers, who “thought bourgeois” in terms of values. 113. Writer in Montpellier (anon.) seems to come from this strata. He is not noble, nor of the “common people” b his own self-definition. 113. They were bourgeois in another sense, as inhabitants of a city. [Burgermeister Meisterburger!] The writer used the term bourgeois himself, as if it were self-evident.…

    • 3555 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution - 1

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many issues that led up to the French Revolution. For example, the unfair tax burden. According to Document two, the Third Estate paid all of the government taxes. There were three estates. The 1st estate was all of the clergy; they had wealth because they collected taxes from the 3rd estate and they also owned land. They had power, food, liberty, and freedom. The 2nd estate was the rich titled nobility. They derived their wealth from land ownership, and they collected some taxes. They also had power, food, and freedom. The 3rd estate was separated into three different classes. The Bourgeoisie was the highest of the third estate; they had cash wealth since they were made up of the merchants, bankers, and artisans. The Bourgeoisie paid very high taxes, and had very little power, they had a food supply, but they had no power. The peasant farmers, and the city workers had no wealth, power, or liberty, and they had to pay taxes. The 1st and 2nd estate only took up about 3% of the population. The Bourgeoisie thought that the taxes were unfair to the entire 3rd estate. Document three explained how a peasant had 7 children, and couldn’t support her family, but she still had to pay taxes. This shows how unfair the tax burden was.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the major inequalities which existed in France in the 1700s were that the people were divided into three large groups, everything depends how is your economic status. They were two two estates had privileges for example access to high offices and exemption of taxes, those privileges weren't granted to the third. The Roman Catholic Church was the first estate which help poor people with education and relief services. The second estate were the rich nobles they own a 20 percent of land and paid almost no taxes. The third estate was the lowest and was three groups divided, first group were the bourgeoisie (middle class) that were the professionals workers, the second group was the worker of France the ones the do the domestic work and then the third was the peasants.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was a very important time in European history. It changed the French society forever. The French Revolution took place in 1789 with many events that had led up to the revolt. France was going through financial debt, and taxes were being raised significantly. (Sargent and Velde 474). During this time period, the social classes were split up into three groups, also known as Estates. The First Estate was the Clergy, the Second Estate included the nobility of France, and the Third Estate was made up of all the commoners (Berdine np). When the Estates were called to a meeting to discuss the debt going on throughout France, and the raising taxes, the Third Estate broke away from the First and Second, and formed the National Assembly (Sargent and Velde 475). When the National Assembly was formed it began the beginning of the French Revolution. The Third Estate, or the National Assembly, was a very important contribute to the French Revolution. Even though the Third Estate made up most of the population, those who were in it…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Revolutionary Storming

    • 3503 Words
    • 101 Pages

    Bibliography: Brown, Robert W. "The French Revolution." _The University of North Carolina at Pembroke_. Web. 26 Sept. 2009. <http://www.uncp.edu/home/rwb/hst32901.htm>.…

    • 3503 Words
    • 101 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aristocracy of France was also weakened by the Revolution. The nobles no longer had their ancient rights and privileges making them ordinary people. In the nineteenth century, the ruling class was no longer decided upon by noble birth but by property. This trait was shown before the Revolution. Also the French government was now ran by the aristocrats and the bourgeois. With the bourgeois being given high positions because of their wealth, talent, ambition, and opportunities, they would have an important role in the political life of France.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolution stems from the dissatisfaction of the people. When government oversteps their limits of power, society generally feels an obligation to revolt. Instances such as the American and French revolutions exemplify the importance of standing up for individual rights. The object of a revolution is to fight for the replacement of an ineffective system of government. Divides in social class, economic disparity and corruption of power are all often symptoms of an impending revolt. The French Revolution is one of the most famous cases of fighting against the injustices of power. Prior to the 1789 start of the French revolution, French society was divided into classes of "estates." There was the first estate which was comprised of the clergy, the second estate which was nobility and the third estate which were commoners. The commoners suffered abject poverty and had limited rights. The aristocracy…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A flawed fixed social structure and fiscal mismanagement are some of the plethora of issues that demonstrated the disdain for the rights of man in pre-revolutionary times. During this time, unequal distribution of wealth, status, and land lead to the economic downfall of France. To put a stop to the financial ruin, leaders knew they needed to make a radical change to their taxation system. Because the first and second estate benefited from tax exemption, the third estate felt the need to fight for their individual freedom and social equality, bringing about the revolution, it’s main goal being the pursuit of the rights of man.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays