LED TV
Hypothesis1:
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
H1: There is association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Total
Age Group
18-30
22
8
2
32
31-45
8
6
1
15 46-65
2
1
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
32
15
3
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no dependency between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Hypothesis 2:
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
H1: There is association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Consumer method of buying a TV based on Technology.
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Total
Age Group
18-30
20
8
4
32
31-45
12
2
1
15 46-65
3
0
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
35
10
5
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
Hypothesis 3:
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer prediction about the future success of Micromax LED TV
H1: There is association between age group and consumer prediction about the future success of Micromax LED TV
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Will MICROMAX be successful in its LED TV product
Yes
No idea
No
Total
Age Group
18-30
12
17
3
32
31-45
5
7
3
15 46-65
0
3
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
17
27
6
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
H1: There is association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Total
Age Group
18-30
22
8
2
32
31-45
8
6
1
15 46-65
2
1
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
32
15
3
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no dependency between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on price.
Hypothesis 2:
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
H1: There is association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Consumer method of buying a TV based on Technology.
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Total
Age Group
18-30
20
8
4
32
31-45
12
2
1
15 46-65
3
0
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
35
10
5
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no association between age group and consumer method of buying a TV based on technology.
Hypothesis 3:
Ho: There is no association between age group and consumer prediction about the future success of Micromax LED TV
H1: There is association between age group and consumer prediction about the future success of Micromax LED TV
Age Group * Method Of Buying Cross tabulation
Will MICROMAX be successful in its LED TV product
Yes
No idea
No
Total
Age Group
18-30
12
17
3
32
31-45
5
7
3
15 46-65
0
3
0
3 65 and above
0
0
0
0
17
27
6
50
Interpretation:
Here sig. P- Value is more than .05 so null hypothesis is accepted, so there is no