Preview

Leadership Style

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leadership Style
Leadership style

Leadership development is considered as one of the key success of management of organizations and companies. Leadership development is involved in the process of improving managerial skills of leadership, realizing both the nature of each organization and the nature of management team in order to implement the right leadership styles. Academic researchers have looked into different management leadership styles and have come up with wildly known three main leadership styles.

According to Kurt Lewin (1939), leadership can be categorized to three main leadership styles which are autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. Each type of leadership can be applied depending upon each organization and in some circumstances. Every leadership styles have their own characteristics which have both strangeness and weakness. Therefore the differences of structures and cultures in organization are needed to be considered as well.

Autocratic style

The first type of leadership is called autocratic style; this style is used when leaders tell their employees what they want and how they want it accomplished, without getting the advice of their followers. Leader is centralizing the power and limit employee participation.

Prescott (1981) mentioned that autocratic is “The leader was seen as the expert who was capable of making effective decisions on most work matters since he dealt with a pattern of recurring work problems”.

Autocratic provides management with both advantages and disadvantages. First of all advantages are mentioned as autocratic can help to reduce stress due to increase control for management. Colvin et al, (1997) Manager has ultimate power to control everything whatever they done. Moreover autocratic manager can help to stimulate poor employee work perform and manager exerts over subordinates improve their working speed. Short term project with complex element and highly technical skills is the most preferable work situation of



Bibliography: Covin,T., Kolenko, T., Sightler, K. and Tudor, R. (1997) “Leadership style and post-merger satisfaction” The Journal of Management Development, 16(1) , pp. 22-33. Park, D. (1996) “Gender role, decision style and leadership style” The Journal Woman in Management Review, 11 (8), pp, 13-17 Adeyemi-Bello, T.(2001) “The impact of leadership style on organizational growth” The journal of work study, 50(4) pp.150-154. Schou A.J. and Storm P.M.(1980) “Leadership & Organization Development Journal” 1(2), pp .26-28 Johansson, O. (2004) “Democracy and leadership – or training for democratic leadership” The journal of Education Administration, 42(6), pp. 620-624. Xirasagar, S. (2008) “Transformational and laissez-faire leadership among physician executive” The journal of health Organization and Management, 22(6), pp.599-613 Crawford, C.B. (2005) “Effects of transformantional leadership and organizational position on knowledge management” The journal of knowledge management, 9(6), pp. 6-16

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There are three principle leadership styles. They are Goleman’s providing six management styles for leaders to work more efficiently with followers based on situation (Hoang, 2010) and Blake and Mouton’s in which the combination between the concern for people and for production is presented and result in the effective management style (BPP learning media, 2010). Moreover, the Hersey and Blanchard’s studies how “leaders match their style to the competence and commitment of subordinates” (Hoang, 2012, p.15).…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many types of leadership styles, but based on Tannebaum and schmidt models, I will discuss the four major types, all provide a different way of implementing plans and motivating people, there are many different factors involved in making a decision on a leadership style, what I will describe in the following will form part of my decision making as to which leadership style I would undertake in different circumstances.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Different types of leadership styles exist in work environments. There are advantages and disadvantages within each leadership style. The culture and goals of an organization determine which leadership style fits the firm best. Some companies offer several leadership styles within the organization. Organizations need strong leadership and strong management for optimal effectiveness. According to Robbins, we need leaders today to challenge the status quo, create visions of the future, and inspire organizational members to want to achieve the visions (Robbins, pp. 368). According to the Houston Chronicle, there are essentially five different types of leadership styles,…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of an organisation and its operating mechanisms could dictate the style of leadership used. Some organisations desire and encourage contributions from their employees, requiring an open and perhaps a transformational style of leadership, whereas other organisations may demand a more dictatorial style.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kotter, John P. A., 1990. Force of Change: How leadership differs From Management. John P. Kotter, Inc.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    By understanding leadership styles will help develop a person into being an effective leader. We will describe the author’s leadership style model and also look into the strengths and weaknesses of that model. Then compare and contrast leadership theories applicable to the author’s leadership approach. Leadership has different characteristics and behaviors then management…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leo1 Week 4 Paper

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages

    LO 1.2: Explain of the relation between an organization’s structure and culture can impact on the performance of the business:…

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many different types of leadership styles from traditional, contemporary and emerging theories. As stated in Nelson and Quick (2013), “Leadership in organizations is the process of guiding and directing the behavior of people in the work environment.” (p.193) In keeping with the traditions of the past, traditional leadership is defined as a style where power is given to the leader. The traditional styles of leadership are autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. An autocratic leader is considered to be an authoritarian. They possess the power to dictate their willon employees and will not hesitate to do so if needed. A manager that uses this leadership styledoes not consult or allow their employees to give any input in decision-making process.Employees that are not self-motivated, who need structure, and need direction and motivation will thrive under this leadership style. The democratic leadership style is much…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many forms of leadership styles, but based on Kurt Lewin’s models from the 1940’s we will discuss the four major traits, authoritarian, democratic, consultative and laissez faire.…

    • 2784 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Referent and Expert Power

    • 2989 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Robbins, S.P., Coulter, M. & Langton, M. (2009). Management (9th Canadian ed.). Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall. Chapter 12…

    • 2989 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bass B M & Riggio R E (2006). Transformational Leadership (Second ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.…

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kreitner and Kinicki (as cited in Darling & Leffel, 2001, p356) state leadership is a process where on individual guide and assist a group to achieve a common goal. Being a successful leader, he/she should have profound knowledge as well as skills. Additionally, Leadership is distinguished form management and this distinction is crucial. Kotterman (2006) explains that to management is that taking responsibility to accomplish and conduct the tasks as well as target. However, he also states that to lead means to direct and influence by an action as well as opinion. Furthermore, Darling and Leffel (2001) point out that leadership styles can be classified into four types which include Analyzer, Connector, Director and Creator, all of which are various. However, different leaders and styles are required in different situations, which is what Morrison (2000) illustrates that different leadership styles generate different influence and significance on the entrepreneurial spirit.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics