Preview

Law of Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1452 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law of Evidence
Assignment: Law of Evidence

Question 1
The law of evidence aims to determine what material may be presented in court as evidence, by whom, in what manner and its probative value.
Question 2
The onus of proof lies with the State to prove that the accused is guilty.
Question 3
Real evidence is evidence in the form of objects or exhibits such as the murder weapon. Documentary evidence is evidence in the form of written documentary such as letters and contracts.
Question 4
Evidential material is admissible when it is relevant and it has been obtained legally to ensure a fair trial for both parties.
Question 5
The plaintiff
Question 6
The State
Question 7
On a balance of probabilities
Question 8
Beyond reasonable doubt
Question 9
The witness must give their own account of the facts. It is to examine the witness’s powers of observation and their commitment to tell the truth.
Question 10
Leading questions and cautionary rule.
Question 11
Oral, documentary, real, direct and circumstantial evidence
Question 12
The relevance of the evidence. The evidence in most of these cases is unreliable and will prejudice the chances of a fair trial.
Question 13
Strong logical and relevant link between facts of case and conduct. Action of defamation. Accused testifies about his own good character and trial on sentence in a criminal case.
Question 14
It is applied to ascertain credibility and treat some types of evidence with caution and circumspection. Usually the evidence is unreliable but that does not make it inadmissible.
Question 15
To single witnesses, children and previously to victims of sexual misconduct.
Question 16
When evidence was obtained, but the constitutional rights of a person (persons) were violated in the process
Question 17
Judicial notice is when the court accepts something as a fact because it is so well known that it would be unnecessary and absurd to require it to be proved.
Question 18

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Why is evidence important in forensic science? What evidence was important in the episodes? Why?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.07 Lab questions

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Why is evidence important in forensic science? What evidence was important in the episodes? Why?…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judge rules on evidence competency issues because it is believed that it is too difficult for a jury to disregard evidence that should not have been admitted based on foundational evidentiary reasons such as the evidence is hearsay that does not meet an exception or an expert is not qualified to give testimony.…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS4670 Unit 2 Lab 1

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page

    1) It is a fundamental protection for a person accused of a crime, which requires the prosecution to prove that you have indeed committed the crime to a jury of your peers.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study pal

    • 959 Words
    • 9 Pages

    preserve testimony of witnesses who may not be available for trial, reduce the likelihood of perjury, and define and narrow the facts.…

    • 959 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence can be as diverse as people; however, when looking to collect any type of evidence, it will typically be separated into one of two categories: real evidence or testimonial. Real evidence is considered to be tangible, such as, it will be anything that the five senses can perceive (Worral, Hemmens, & Nored, 2012, p. 71). Articles of clothing, weapons, contracts or legal documentation, and photographs are all examples of tangible / real evidence. Additionally, within this same category of real evidence, “demonstrative” evidence will also be included. This type of evidence would be anything that can actually demonstrate the crime and/or scene. For example, a technician…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    prosecuted unjustly or even falsely tried. Defense attorneys are not well trained for the all…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hearsay evidence is circumstantial evidence because it is not direct. Direct evidence is a testimony of an eyewitness. Since the person stating the evidence saw nothing, but only heard his or her mom state that it was Bubba.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as to which evidence to disregard and which to hold as important. In extreme cases, the judge…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does all evidences can be used to convict a person? Circumstantial evidence is an indirect evidence that relies on connection with a particular case, but can’t be used as a proving alone. People have different thought of should circumstantial evidence can be use to convict a person. In my opinion, circumstantial evidence should never use for declaration of guilt because of the following reason. First, it is not credible. Second, It does not contain any or non scientific analysis. Last but not least, Because of circumstantial evidence, many innocent people are punished.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rule of Evidence 403 says, “The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence” (2015). A defense attorney could utilize Motion in limine to request that the judge rule that certain testimony be excluded. The motion is always discussed outside the presence of the jury and is always decided by a judge. For example, after examining police reports and other documents it is detected that the crime scene was contaminated which could be argued that any DNA evidence taken from the scene is compromised and therefore any scientific evidence or expert opinions relating to this would be prejudicial. Another example could be that law enforcement did not procure proper search warrants before a search and seizure; therefore, all evidence gathered resulted in an improper discovery and should be excluded since it violates…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    in who goes to prison. Weak and fabricated evidence is seldom looked at in the eyes of the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law of Evidence

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Evidence Law deals with deciding which Evidence should be and which shouldn't be used in arriving at a decision by the Court and, sometimes, the weight that may be given to that evidence. The law of evidence is also concerned with the quantum (amount), quality, and type of proof needed to prevail in litigation. The quantum of evidence is the amount of evidence needed; the quality of proof is how reliable such evidence should be considered. This includes such concepts as hearsay (Hearsay, is the evidence of those who relate, not what they know themselves, but what they have heard from others.), authentication, admissibility, reasonable doubt, and clear and convincing evidence. There are several types of evidence, depending on the form or source. When a dispute, whether relating to a civil or criminal matter, reaches the court there will always be a number of issues which one party will have to prove in order to persuade the court to find in his or her favour. The law must ensure certain guidelines are set out in order to ensure that evidence presented to the court can be regarded as trustworthy. In Scots law the rule of corroboration in criminal cases, requires that there must be two pieces of evidence, to prove each essential fact. For example, DNA evidence could corroborate an eye witness testimony, proving person X committed a crime. This corroboration requirement no longer applies in civil cases, with the exception of some areas of family law, such as divorce, when another individual, not party to the marriage, must act as 'witness', however this is not referred to as corroboration. Most legal disputes which get to court involve a dispute about the facts. For instance, on a charge of murder the prosecution must prove that the victim was killed by the defendant who at the time had that mental state specified by the Criminal Law for murder. The facts in issue will be the actions and the mental state of the defendant. The court reconstructs…

    • 3389 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays