Preview

Law 531 Week 2 Threats

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 531 Week 2 Threats
Law 531
Week two

Law 531 Week Two Threats.

The contract is agreement between two parties they find they have some to exchange; the power and commitment between two parties enforcement by the court, The contract have many legal details to be discussed by lawyer or expert. The contract administration, focus on the requirement for the services the company have to get when they sign a contract for new service or to get new products. In field like software consultant it is very complicated and different detailed need to focus on contract to be discussed before to sign any paper. The orientation, communication form and conference can be helpful to create good and detailed contract, all this method help the offeror and offeree to reach good level of understand what is both right they can get from the contract.

What benefits would counsel provide in helping a victim to decide whether to take a settlement offer or pursue litigation?

If the opposing party has Counsel, it is always my suggestion that they too should obtain counsel as the other party would be at an advantage of having legal representation to ensure their best interests are taken care of. Furthermore, an attorney would be able to assist in ensuring your case is properly filed and to ensure that all deadlines are met. If an individual does not meet necessary deadlines, their case can be thrown out for good. An attorney would also be beneficial once a settlement offer is presented as they can assist in negotiating on your behalf. An attorney would also be beneficial after the settlement has occurred as they may be able to work with any creditors you have to attempt to reduce..

The counsel helping the victim what is the maximum benefit come from his case. He advice the victim if this settlement will be reasonable or he pursues litigation. Counsel give advise for the victim about his right by the law. Without counsel the victim can avoid many benefit about his case the law give the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Week 3

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mediation would most likely be the fastest of all three options, but Hal would not have a chance at a counter suit. The best outcome of mediation would be zero cost to both…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Week 2

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Betty is married to Abel, a successful engineer. They have a joint account which gives them both an American Impress credit card, which they have had for years. They have always made the payments on time and over the years the credit limit has gone up and up. Abel has a skiing accident and dies. A month later, Betty gets a notice that her American Impress card has been cancelled. To make matters worse, the fact that her card has been cancelled is reported to a credit reporting company, which hurts Betty’s credit score and makes it harder for her to get credit. Does the law provide any protections for Betty? What can she do?…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Johnson Negligence Case

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page

    What was it that triggered Johnson’s necessity for a lawyer in addition to his representation by his insurance carrier’s lawyer (Thomas)? In other words, why did Johnson have to hire Comfort?…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    he counselled the Plaintiffs to go back to the Herne Bay developer to try and negotiate a postponed settlement date, and that he would support them in that endeavour; and…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    victim in the position he/she was before the tort was committed. Difficult to do, so we…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A counsel should be able to help a victim determine how to proceed based on their knowledge of law, whether it is a settlement offer or litigation, given the known facts of the situation. If a victim is suffering financially, then they may need a quicker payout in a settlement. If a victim prefers that the situation remain private for them, then they would want to settle out of court and know that their part in the case is final. Negotiation is within their hands to try to get the best settlement instead of years of litigation with premium attorney fees, public disclosure, and unknown results.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal injury settlement help victims recover financial damages and ensure proper medical treatment. As settlement is done out of court, the process is often faster than courtroom trials and victims receive the compensation when they actually need it.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lawyers rely on the members of the team because of the amount of work that has to be accomplished to prepare a case. Law firms have assigned duties and responsibilities for these members and they work collectively to accomplish their goals.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    There are specific differences between forensic psychologists and counseling psychologists/therapists. Not just the obvious differences such as the forensic psychologist being retained by the courts, prosecution, or defense, and the counseling psychologist performing therapeutic treatments and sessions to help the client/patient heal, but other ethical differences that enable the forensic psychologist to disclose his/her finds to the entity that has retained him/her to assess, interview and test the defendant/examinee. In this paper, the ethical dilemma that is discussed is dual relationships, confidentiality and informed consent. A counseling therapist or psychologist cannot disclose information about his/her client without their written consent and a court order if needed. For the forensic psychologist, it is unavoidable to disclose his/her findings in an open court, it is contractual. So these two professions, however, similar, they are opposite when it comes to the ethical boundaries that they must abide. It is the hypothesis of this paper that the two fields cannot ethically coincides without doing harm to the client/patient/examinee.…

    • 3150 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They advise the clients of their rights, explains what can happen for each step of the criminal procedure and help ensure their client’s rights are not violated. The defense attorney must be knowledgeable and competent through all phases while failure in this can have disastrous consequences for the attorney and the defendant. The attorney will help with plea bargains arrangements, decide what is going to be the best course of action to defend the charges or help negotiate a guilty plea punishment. The defense attorney’s position does not end with the completion of the criminal trial. They will also be needed for the trial’s punishment phase, and any appeals process or parole hearings. The attorney must be able to develop a meaningful relationship with the client in order to provide the proper defense counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the “effective assistance of counsel” for criminal defendants.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will review the following three areas: The Final Exit Network, Crime Victim's, , and Social Security Disability Advocacy. Additionally, we will explore the information which is available and links to mediation and advocacy to the human services field. This paper will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each site, the availability of information, and the current trends using advocacy and or mediation in the human services field.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it may be obvious to you that you should receive compensation for your injuries, the extent of the compensation may not be clear, and without legal representation, you may end up with less than you are entitled to. A lawyer can listen to your story, and once all of the available evidence is known,…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a person suffers injury due to someone else's action, it is natural for him to ask for compensation for that injury. Unfortunately, in most of the cases, the injured person is denied the compensation he is entitled for and the insurance companies never always underpay for their own stakes. Insurance companies do this deliberately as they are aware of the fact that a common person does not know the legalities because of which he will never be able to protest them. This is when there comes a need of personal injury lawyer. A qualified lawyer will assure that the injured gets his due justice.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As advisor, a lawyer provides a client with an informed understanding of the client's legal rights and obligations and explains their practical implications.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Challanges

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many challenges that one must face when working in the human service field. Mediation and advocacy is two of the many challenges. Both of these jobs require one to be fair and un-bias. Moreover, one must be careful of a dual relationship of any kind. In this paper I will explore my personal opinion on the integration of mediation and advocacy in the human service field and my personal philosophy and approach on how to advocate for an adult client on probation. A mediator is an impartial third party who meets with two or more people to encourage and facilitate communication in order to reach an agreement or conclusion over a conflict that exists between the two parties. The mediator is not the decision maker. The two parties and not the mediator will make the final decision. It is the legal and ethical job of the mediator to keep all communication confidential unless otherwise specified (The Association of Attorney-Mediators, 2001).…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics