Preview

Law 310 Week 2 Assignment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1733 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 310 Week 2 Assignment
Law 310-64311: The Legal Environment
Nancy Bauer
Chapter 4: Question 12, p. 170
On July 5, 1884, four sailors were cast away from their ship in a storm 1,600 miles from the Cape of Good Hope. Their lifeboat contained neither water nor much food. On the 20th day of their ordeal, Dudley and Stevens, without the assistance or agreement of Brooks, cut the throat of the fourth sailor, a 17- or 18-year-old boy. They had not eaten since day 12. Water had been available only occasionally. At the time of the death, the men were probably about 1,000 miles from land. Prior to his death, the boy was lying helplessly in the bottom of the boat. The three surviving sailors ate the boy’s remains for four days, at which point they were rescued by a passing boat. They were in a seriously weakened condition.
a. Were Dudley and Stevens guilty of murder? Explain.
b. Should Brooks have been charged with a crime for eating the boy’s flesh? Explain. See The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queen’s Bench Division 273 (1884).
My response: In this case I do feel the sailors Dudley and Stevens are guilty of murder due to their conspiracy to kill the weakened sailor Parker without Parker’s knowledge or consent. The sailors Dudley and Stevens did commit a wrongful act that would fall under criminal law of murder. This wrongful act was against the societal norm and is categorized as a crime (McAdams, 134). The sailors were not defending themselves against any harm that Parker could have caused as he was very weak and near death from dehydration and the lack of food and possibly suffering of high doses of sodium levels in his body from drinking the salt water. Here we clearly have Dudley and Stevens acting on their own judgment to take the life of their companion because of their terrible suffering from the lack of food and water and were not acting of a sound mind. It may be due to these terrible sufferings that led them to kill and eat the boy out of necessity. We may think it would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First of all, the actions committed by Dudley and Stephens were quite obviously illegal. Though not on the mainland, this court's jurisdiction falls in the area of the crime at hand. Laws are still laws in our waters. Secondly, the men decided to kill Brooks with the justification that he "was going to die soon anyway" and they should "get it over with". This type of euthanasia was completely unjustified, based on the fact that Brooks rejected the idea of having the men kill and eat him when his lot was drawn. Though Brooks may have been on his death bed, Dudley and Stephens committed murder by taking his life. Also, the discussion of drawing the lots was in no way contractual, thus making in no way a binding agreement on the obscene act.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What problems do you think Dr. Patel might see with the fact that you have taken the property under a quitclaim deed?…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Widget Tech Inc. is in need of update the company’s current code of ethics due to growth of the company and the changing workforce. Research has been conducted to revise the current policy and address topics that were previously overlooked. Widget Tech Inc. is a company that stresses both corporate and personal integrity. We not only comply with laws and applicable regulations; but we also strive to conduct our affairs according to the highest ethical standards. Employees are expected to be honest and forthright in dealings with managers, subordinates and with one another, as well as with clients, suppliers, government agencies and their employees, business partners and the general public. Widget Tech employees must maintain the highest level of personal integrity and encourage it in others; they must not lie, cheat, steal or do anything that would bring dishonor upon themselves or the company (SRA International, Inc. 2009).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which element of a contract requires something of legal value to be provided in exchange…

    • 1968 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 304 Midterm

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Court decisions and statutes can take away rights created by the United States Constitution. (Points : 1)…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAWS1061 Exam Notes

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Private – an interference affecting private rights of an individual, specifically concerning the use of their land.…

    • 10741 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Final Exam

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1) Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is an introductory course, prerequisite to further studies in law. The course begins with a discussion of the nature and sources of law and an examination of the court system in Canada, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and a survey of the more important aspects of the law of torts. The course then concentrates on the legal requirements for the formation of a valid contract. Other major contract law topics include interpretation, privity, discharge, breach, and special types of contracts. Selected cases will be examined. This course, including all communications with the instructor, does not constitute legal advice, but academic information only. If you require legal advice to rely upon, you should retain a lawyer.…

    • 3599 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Unit 23

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before any law and acts are made, there is a long procedure in the process of it being passed. If there are new laws it usually is chosen by majority decision usually in courts or the parliament. For example, the executive or the government form laws in the House of Commons by setting out bills. Sometimes it may come from their election mandate in order to be chosen, for example recently how labour vowed to ban fox hunting which can be shown as an example. Moreover, they then set out a bill to become an act which gets passed to the house and then to the House of Lords as a checking procedure before it is made. However, if the House of Lords don’t pass it as a law then the executive can go and make it an act. This specific method shows that it can be done by the government and has a process for it before anything can be done; usually these acts and laws come out during elections in order to win voters and sometimes are done and even not processed.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution The ultimate document that gives governments their authority; also serves to limit governmental authority, to protect civil rights, etc. Other laws, judicial decisions and executive actions must be consistent with the applicable constitution or it falls to the courts to strike down (law, decision or action).…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laws 310 Week 3

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. You are the judge in the case. Does Susie have a case against Ruthless? Is Ruthless the proximate cause of Susie’s injuries?…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When looking at the case of The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens and the punishment that the two men face after conviction is one that requires a lot of thought (Brody and Acker, 2010). These two men were faced with a difficult situation that due to their being in a position of making life threating decisions that would determine if they all lived or if they all died with the sacrifice of one saving the other three men. These two men’s fate, after their criminal conviction, should be evaluated with the circumstances of the crime of murder with the intent of the two men to survive while stuck in the middle of the ocean with no way out (Gollwitzer and Keller, 2010).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hdhjdk

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Regina v. Dudley & Stephens case is one of the most important cases in common law history regarding the relationship between criminal law and morality. This case is based upon three men, including Dudley, Stephens and a young boy that were stranded at sea on a small emergency boat after they were forced to abandon their ship because of a dangerous storm. On the 18th day, they were stranded at sea, with no food and no water, one of the men (Dudley) thought it was a good idea to draw straws to decide which man should give up his life for the needs of the others on the raft (cannibalism). As a result to the idea, Stephens agreed to the “drawing,” while the third man refused. Dudley and Stephens noticed that the boy was ill and did not have a family like theirs, so they decided that rather than sacrifice the life of a healthy grown man with a family, it would be more practical to kill the boy and eat him while they wait to be rescued. Therefore, Dudley eventually killed the boy by cutting his throat. The three men fed upon the body and blood of the boy for four days. On the fourth day after the act had been committed, the boat was picked up by a passing boat and the prisoners were rescued. After their rescue, Dudley and Stephens were promptly brought back to England to face a trial for the charge of murder. In my opinion, I believe that the men should be considered guilty based upon Natural Law and its…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    necessity

    • 2567 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Dudley and Stephens 18845, A man who, in order to escape death from hunger, kills another for the purpose of eating his flesh, is guilty of murder; although at the time of the act he is in such circumstances that he believes and has reasonable ground for believing that it affords the only chance of preserving his life. The Divisional Court held that that act was not done under a threat and therefore the defendants were found guilty and charged with murder. This shows that the court was not prepared to allow the defence of necessity.…

    • 2567 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays