Preview

Labeling Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Labeling Theory
Labeling Theory The theory of labeling is defined as a view of deviance. According to being labeled a deviant person, is one that engages in deviant behaviors. Labeling theory was quite popular in the 1960s and early 1970s, but then fell into decline, partly as a result of the mixed results of empirical research (Criminal Law, 2010). The theory of labeling was originated from Howard Becker 's work in the 1960s; it explains why people 's behavior clashes with social norms (Boundless, 2009). With labeling theory it’s not until a label is given to someone by another in a position of some sort of social or economic power that the person actually becomes deviant. The concept of labeling theory can be broken down into different ways of categorizing an individual of having deviance. One of which can be a primary deviance. The behavior of Primary deviance is a person who does not conform to so call normal social standards. Although, the behavior might be temporary or concealed form other people (Criminal Law, 2010). A person who commits a deviant act does not see their self as being deviant and is not internalized as a part of their self-concept. I don’t believe that this concept would fall on a juvenile’s perspective when it comes to being labeled. There are some juveniles that do not accept what is told to them of what they are or what they may become. Most of these juveniles are delinquents they want to live by their own standards and will not accept the label of being deviant as their means of delinquent behaviors. Considering another category of deviance in labeling theory is secondary deviance. With secondary deviance a person’s behavior that does not meet social standards but is the behavior that is more sustained over a period of time. With Secondary deviance a person will continue to do the deviant behavior even after they have been caught and are so called labeled by that social institution (Crime Causation, 2010). After they have


References: Criminal Law. (2010). Labeling Theory its Strengths and Weaknesses. Retrieved from http://www.lawteacher.net/criminal-law/essays/labelling-theory-its-strengths-and-weaknesses.php Crime Causation. (January 17, 2010). Sociological Theories - Labeling Theory. Retrieved from http://law.jrank.org/pages/817/Crime-Causation-Sociological-Theories-Labeling-theory.html#ixzz0cziNc0ZO Boundless. (2009). Labeling Theory. Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/sociology/understanding-deviance-social-control-and-crime/the-symbolic-interactionalist-perspective/labeling-theory/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The labeling theory is basically when society labeling a group or person as a certain category so much, the deviant group or person becomes what society labels them as. The Roughnecks developed a reputation in school for only maintaining close to a “C” average. The teachers did not usually push them to reach their full potential so they did not push them. The Roughnecks also had tendencies to talk back and not trust authority figures. They disrespected them. The police and the Roughnecks had also had a bad relationship because the police had labeled them. The police labeled the Roughnecks just as the did the saints. The Roughnecks had no money for bail, disrespectful, and deviant to the way society defines a “good teenager or…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lemert distinguishes between primary and secondary deviance in society. Primary deviance involves minor offences such as vandalism or smoking underage and these acts are usually uncaught or insignificant. However an individual may be caught for such acts and inturn be labelled as delinquent or deviant, the social reaction of this label results in the development of secondary deviance: more serious crimes such as assault or drugs. This therefore illustrates that it is not the act itself but the hostile societal reaction by significant others that creates serious deviance, thus crime and deviance being products of the labelling process.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lemert supports Becker’s ideas on the consequences of labelling. He maintains that primary deviance which has not been labelled has few consequences for the individual concerned. However, he claims that once deviance is labelled it…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This theory also explains how labeling these indivudal and them becoming an outcast can affect the behaviors. This theory is to point out how social rproccesses of labeling and treating someoneas criminally deviant actually fosters deviant behavior and has a negative repercussion for that person because other are likely to be bias toward the offender because of the…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    howard beckers theroy

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Howard Becker’s labeling theory starts off by identifying the deviant. Once you get caught doing something, you are identified and labeled for it; it can either be formal as labeled under the law or informal as in labeled with in family and friends. For example, I had two very good friends in high school, Serafin and Brian. They were best buds and always did everything together. Like many teenagers in high school they started to experiment with drugs. Like every other day they would both go smoke weed and get high in the alley afterschool. No one ever walked through the alley unless you were doing drugs or something but that day the police were roaming around the block because a robber had broke into someone’s house, Serafin and Brian happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time. The cops drove through the alley and had seen both of them smoking, their first reaction was to run but where? When there wasn’t anywhere to run, it was a dead end. So they quickly jumped tried to jump the fence while Brian jumped the fence successfully and got to runaway, Serafin wasn’t so fortunate and ended up getting his pants stuck to the fence. As soon as Serafin got arrested he was immediately identified and labeled. As for Brian he didn’t get caught and never got labeled even though he was there and performing the same deviant actions as Serafin.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks)…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Affiliation with gangs as an adolescent teen impedes academic success. By having low commitment to school and high levels of anti-social behavior, creates a label for any youth to be known as someone who is “learning disabled” (Why Do Youth Join Gangs?). A youth that is negatively labeled becomes trapped in that label due to the process of tagging. In this circumstance, “tagging is the process whereby an individual is negatively defined by the agencies of justice” (Schmalleger, 2014 pg. 231). The justice defined in this case, are the teachers and distant students towards a youth. Secondary deviance is a result of tagging and plays a forceful role on the youth to internalize their negative labels placed upon by others to assume the role of the…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. If the person is successfully labelled then consequences follow. Once publicly labelled as deviant, an offender is left facing a limited number of options.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The criminal career is composed of re-offenses due to lack of social integration, exclusion from mainstream structures and in some cases renegation of the societal norms. The deviant is theorized to perceive no other choice but further deviance because the label attached to their discovery turns them into untrustworthy or even dangerous individuals. The social response only creates a backlash that manifests as acceptance of the label, retreatment from society or…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Deviance and Race

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Conley, the labeling theory is the belief that individuals subconsciously notice how others see or label them, and their reactions to those labels, over time, form the basis of their self-identity. In other words, labeling theory is the idea that society determines the distinction between what is deviant and what is not deviant. This theory states that conforming members of society, especially individuals with power, impose significant labels on certain behaviors, constructing them to be deviant.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Things such as stealing fruit from the neighbor’s tree, sneaking into pools, or skipping school. In upper class neighborhoods these things could possibly been seen as rebellion or innocent acts in the process of growing up. In areas of poverty this behavior could be seen as acts towards juvenile delinquency. Once a person is labeled as deviant, it is difficult for them to remove that label. That deviant person is branded as a criminal is likely to be treated or considered untrustworthy by society. The person labeled is more susceptible to accept the new title that has been attached to them, and starts to see him or herself as deviant. They then start to fulfill the expectations that society has given to them. It’s possible that the individual labeled never commits another deviant act after the one that caused them to be labeled deviant. Even after a clean slate of no deviant behavior it is still hard for the label that was given to be forgotten. Those that have been formally or publicly labeled as deviant are treated with suspicion likely for the remainder of their…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social research suggest that labeling people make them feel negatively about themselves , and they have a low self image. Sometimes people except labels of other, so it is hard for them to change this label. Some people feel that deviance can be a set of characteristics of a group, but it is not. Ihis is the process that happen between deviants and non-deviants. The three typology of deviance, and the first one is pure deviance. Pure deviance the person gets what is coming to them, and society has correctly appraised the situation because of bad behavior.Falsely accused is not guilty, but they get labeled deviant. They have to go through the process of conviction, and they have negative connotations about it. Secret deviant is behavior not noticed,this violates the norms of society. Every one who experience negative labeling self image is effected. Pure deviance, Falsely accused, and Secret devian self image are affected by being convicted. They are usually considered a menace to society, so most people won't even think twice to give these convicted felons a job, so most of the times these negative connotations will make them go back to jail. They can’t get a job with these kind of negative labels on them, so if they did not do it at first, they might do it…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labeling Theory

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Labeling Theory begins with the idea that people will be at odds with one another because their values and beliefs differ. Certain people then gain power and translate their normative and value preferences into rules which govern institutional life which gives the position to place negative labels on those who do not follow their rules, calling them deviants. Howard S. Becker popularized this labeling perspective. He believed that deviance results from social judgments relative to group norms that are applied as labels to certain forms of behavior. Becker stated: “Social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance and by applying the rules to particular people and labeling them as outsiders”. He felt that studying the act of the individual was unimportant because deviance is simply rule breaking behavior that is labeled deviant by persons in positions of power.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics