Kitzmiller Study
In the case of Kitzmiller versus Dover Area School District, the plaintiff Kitzmiller argued that the defendant, Dover Area School District, changed the curriculum of a biology course on the theory of evolution to intelligent design, which is a form of creationism. The defendants tried to deny that Intelligent Design a form of creationism but a form of true science. On the topic of scientific world view, further examination will take place on how science is democratic, how illegitimate forms of argumentation take place in this case and how intelligent design is a pseudoscience. Science is democratic and a scientist hypothesis can be tested by other scientists and try to be replicate the same findings, if there is not enough evidence to support the hypothesis then the validity of the hypothesis comes into question. Biochemist from Lehigh University, Michael Behe, was crossed examined by Juris Doctor, Eric Rotchschild, who questioned the
…show more content…
One example would be fallacy of negation. Fallacy of negation is when argument A is false and if Argument A is false then it makes Argument B true. The book “Of Pandas and People,” claimed that due to the gaps in the fossil record, it must have been created by an intelligent designer. The defendants did not challenge the theory of evolution to see if it was true in regards to the fossil record. The statement from an expert witness on the case, paleontologist Kevin Padian, mentioned that the arguments in book about the fossil record are false. Another illegitimate form of argumentation would be arguments from ignorance. Arguments from ignorance is when a person thinks a theory is wrong because it cannot be explained. Dr. Behe coined the term irreducible complexity, and thought it was true since it could not be proven otherwise. This example is an argument from ignorance irreducible complexity cannot be disproved, but that doesn’t make it
One example would be fallacy of negation. Fallacy of negation is when argument A is false and if Argument A is false then it makes Argument B true. The book “Of Pandas and People,” claimed that due to the gaps in the fossil record, it must have been created by an intelligent designer. The defendants did not challenge the theory of evolution to see if it was true in regards to the fossil record. The statement from an expert witness on the case, paleontologist Kevin Padian, mentioned that the arguments in book about the fossil record are false. Another illegitimate form of argumentation would be arguments from ignorance. Arguments from ignorance is when a person thinks a theory is wrong because it cannot be explained. Dr. Behe coined the term irreducible complexity, and thought it was true since it could not be proven otherwise. This example is an argument from ignorance irreducible complexity cannot be disproved, but that doesn’t make it