Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King Lear by William Shakespeare: One of the Greatest Tragic Plays

Good Essays
1404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear by William Shakespeare: One of the Greatest Tragic Plays
King Lear by William Shakespeare is regarded as one of the greatest tragic plays ever written. We see heroes die left and right for what is “right”, we see the bad guys come to their demise and, in the end, we are left with Edgar of Gloucester. Edgar, throughout the play, underwent serious transformation, serious rough times, serious agony and true self-discovery, going from naïve heir to bold champion and because of that, he can fill Lear's shoes. The average playgoer would say this with ease: the death of the old royals and Edgar's arrival is pure consolation. Britain can thrive with Edgar in power. This essay will prove the exact opposite. Britain will not get better because of cowardice, lack of dependability and the fact the old King's shoes aren’t so big to begin with.

King Lear’s inciting incident is Lear disowning his youngest and most-loving daughter Cordelia and leaving the kingdom to his older daughters, Regan and Goneril. Regan and Goneril show their true colours very soon after being given Cordelia’s land and are pinned as villains instantly. Everything is believed to go downhill from there. As the play goes on, the now divided courts are only seen in the mist of trouble and it is Regan and Goneril’s fault. The problem with leaving that point there is it is clear you cannot. Firstly, how can Regan and Goneril be so evil when Lear is good? Secondly, was the court in good shape when Regan and Goneril came in to rule? In Act I, there is much talk of the former king being hasty, short-tempered and frivolous. Examples of this throughout the play: he refuses to give up his retinue of one hundred knights, curses Goneril with infertility when she fires the knights herself and he fires servant Kent for simply disagreeing with him. This is not a stable leader. We also see the Earl of Gloucester (a part of Lear’s team and the future king’s father) brag about having a bastard son. It is clear these men are not good influences. In fact, Lear says in Act 2 scene 4, “…thou art my flesh, my blood, my daughter…Which I must needs call mine…In my corrupted blood.” (2. 4. 221 – 225). “My corrupted blood,” he says. Lear recognizes here what we could call genes. He realizes that traits can be given, or at least influenced by, a parent. Goneril is not wicked on her own; she gets her love of power and selfishness from him. On the idea of power and selfishness, we receive clues the kingdom was not in great shape when Lear ruled. This is seen when Lear’s dismissed servant and Earl Kent returns to court as Casius, a poor man looking for work, and no one is the wiser. Edgar also disguised himself as poor when he is running from the law. He encounters several people from the court—from gentlemen, to Kent to the King—and is unrecognized. This shows beggars are much too common. Nobles change their accents and clothes and pass as one. Lear expresses his newfound acknowledgement of the poor when he encounters Edgar as Poor Tom in a heath. “Your looped and windowed raggedness, defend you/From seasons…O, I have ta’en/Too little care of this!” (3. 4. 31 – 33) Regan and Goneril have come to rule a kingdom that’s not in good shape, influenced by a careless king. It’s not a surprise things supposedly get worse. So terrible in fact, the first in line for ruler after everyone else dies resigns immediately.

This character is Duke of Albany, husband of Goneril. It is widely believed Albany is a representation of the divided loyalty conflict in England in the 17th century. Throughout the play he is unsure whether to stick by his wife or defend the old King. “I cannot be so partial, Goneril, /To the great love I bear you—” he says to his wife in his first protest (1. 4. 309 - 310) but he does nothing more. It is not until Act 4 scene 2 that Albany tells Goneril how he honestly feels. Only this comes much too late as Lear has kicked out in the cold and the Earl of Gloucester has had both his eyes gauged. In this argument, two acts too late, Goneril calls Albany a “milk-livered man” (4. 2. 50), implying he has no courage or passion. Unfortunately, Goneril is correct. Soon after Albany declares he is ready to fight the upcoming war…on Goneril’s side. Albany and the army end up defeating the King. Albany feels sorry for this and quotes, “Our present business / Is general woe,” (5. 2. 317 – 318) after Lear drops dead. At that point everyone standing in Albany’s way of a clear mind and decisiveness is dead: Goneril, Lear, Regan and Edmund. But Albany doesn’t step up to the plate. He resigns. Then, Kent, the most loyal noble, backs out. Cowardice is apparent when Edgar is left.

Edgar is made king of Britain by process of elimination and this is a bad, bad thing. While many argue Edgar is the saviour (he is constantly depicted as a Christ-like character) Edgar hard times are his own fault from his cowardice and naivety. When Edmund tells Edgar to flee, he does. Edmund has no explanation as to why he should. Just that he heard people were out for him. Edgar knows he hasn’t offended his father or anyone and still run, leaving himself homeless. This makes it clear Edgar is unable to stand up for himself. He is gullible and passive. These are not kinglike traits. Luckily, he undergoes life-changing experiences, the average playgoer would say. However, Edgar’s change a) is self-induced and b) has negative results. Edgar purposely disguises himself as a bedlam beggar, goes all the way instantly, cutting his arm and behaving mad to the highest extent, says in the dramatic line “Edgar I nothing am.” (2. 3. 21) Edgar spends sometime in the outside world—weeks, maybe a month—and when Lear encounters him in the heath it seems like he has actually gone mad, what with the lack of necessity being such a drastic change. Act 3 scene 6 proves that false because Edgar returns to his old, articulate self when the rest of the characters exit. “He childed as I fathered,” he says, comparing himself to Lear (3. 6. 109) “As I fathered” is a clear reference to Gloucester. Edgar still thinks of himself as the Earl’s son. He hasn’t shed the noble skin as he proclaimed he had in Act 2, scene 3, line 21. He is still a gentleman of the court and when he returns to court (after two other disguises, deceiving his blind and suicidal father for no good reason) he is a champion fighter, battling his own brother Edmund for Duke of Albany. Edmund had done some pretty despicable things. He set Edgar for the death penalty and then Gloucester. Neither were killed. In fact, if the idea of transformation were legitimate, we say Edmund helped Edgar and Gloucester see reality. Edgar winds up wounded Edmund fatally. He knows it was brother, but his brother does not know it was him. He reveals himself but does not apologize. He says, “The gods are just…” (5. 3. 170) In reality, Edmund failed at his main plot; neither Edgar nor Gloucester died. They are freed. Edgar seems to have vengeance and justice confused. He had gone from naïve man to slayer. He rid himself of what he deserved, fooled his father and killed his brother and the play ends with “…we that are young / Shall never see so much, nor live so long. (5. 3. 325 – 326) It seems he believe a rebirth is due. However, he is still there. He is residue of old court and, from see his own behavior, Britain will not improve.

Through allusion and flattery the wrong can look right. Lear is flattered and loved king and therefore respected by the audience. Edgar and Albany are pity, innocent in comparison to fellow character and therefore rooted for. Nonetheless, no character is flawless and no noble of King Lear is truly noble. We’d like to believe that. After all, Britain needs a ruler.

“The art of necessities is strange / And can make vile things precious.” – King Lear (3. 2. 70 – 71)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    8. What information is contained in the letter that Edmund pretends to conceal from his father?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exile or even exclusion has shown to have deep effects on a person. It can break you down from the person you once strived to be, or it can make you into a more enriched person. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, the character, Kent, went through an exile that caused his character to have a potent and enriching experience. His experience alienated him from the relationship he and the king once shared, but eventually led to him letting out his feelings to an unsuspecting fellow, creating a closer relationship with his beloved king, and even connecting him to the dear Lear’s adored Cordelia.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s tragic works are notably characterized by the hamartia of their protagonists. This tragic flaw is a defect in character that brings about an error in action, eventually leading to the characters imminent downfall. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, written in 1606, the King’s hamartia proves to be his extreme rashness, which results in the loss of most everything that he holds dear, including his authority, his affluence and his family. The reasons for his downfall lie within the flaws of his own character, made evident by his insatiable need for flattery and his egotistical fixations.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire are very different on the outside they share internal values. King Lear is a play written by William Shakespeare, who was an English poet and playwright who was widely regards as the greatest writer in the English language and the world pre-eminent dramatist (Shakespear, 1998). Candide by Voltaire is a satire, Voltaire was born Francois-Marie Arouet, he use his satirizing style of writing to make fun of the Powerful Frenchmen of his time (voltaire, 1991). The internal values of both books connect them with the Human Condition of man, His love of family in King Lear, with his daughter Cordelia un-condition love for him and Candide love for Lady Cunegonde. The hardship that both characters endured throughout these writing, King Lear by Shakespeare and Candide by Voltaire.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At the beginning of the play, King Lear’s loss of the throne is his responsibility and entirely his own fault. Lear had hopes to rid himself of the burden of the throne by giving away the power of his kingdom to the daughter whom he feels loves him most. When speaking with his three daughters, Lear inquires “which of you shall say we doth love [me] most” (I.i.49), both Regan and Goneril shower Lear with flowery words and exaggerated lies. Upon delivering these lies to their father, Regan and Goneril are both granted power over parts of Lear’s kingdom. When it comes time for Cordelia to express her love she speaks the blatant truth enraging her father with her love for him only going so far as to cover “[her] bonds, no more, no less” (I.i.92-93). Lear’s excessive pride and arrogance does not allow for him to accept the truth, thus causing him to “declaim all [his] paternal care” (I.i.113). Lear’s injustice towards Cordelia, his only honest and loyal daughter is proof that a civilization needs justice to be a functioning society.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeares The Tragedy of King Lear has been carefully constructed to create a domino effect: had Cordelia said more than nothing, had Gloucester spoken to Edgar about the letter, and if Edgar had not decided to become a beggar he may not have been able to save his father. Harmatia is thus present as the audience wonders what would have happened had Edmond not ordered Cordelia to be killed. Hence the hand of fate or more appropriately, the hand of the playwright is evident and draws the audiences attention to the immense suffering of humanity and to the idea of redemption. Though Shakespeare created the play with the purpose of eliciting Catharsis within the audience there is the idea that he took it too far. A.C Bradley challenges the integrity of King Lears cathartic ending; surely the tragic outcome of Lears error and his daughters ingratitude has been made clear enough and moving enough with a tragedy this should seem inevitable. But this does not. It is not even satisfactorily motivated. In fact it seems expressly designed to fall suddenly like a bolt from a sky created by the vanished storm. Clearly he believes that the conclusion was overdone as there were far too many dead bodies on the stage and as the play became more horrific and gruesome the cathartic elements were minimised.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s King Lear is a timeless play whose textual integrity lends itself to a variety of interpretations and in exploring the human condition the text remains relevant across a wide range of contexts. It is possible to present the text as exploring and affirming the human condition, where humanity is defined as the ability to love and empathise. However, in the same instance, a nihilist perspective, such as Peter Brooke’s 1971 production of King Lear, challenges this by outlining that humanity as an imaginary ideal.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You make decision everyday; whether it is choosing what you make for breakfast or choosing what you want to be when you grow up. It is natural in humans to make decisions and act on what they believe is to be true. This not only applies to humans, but authors use them in their books or plays to create different types of characters. In one of the greatest works by William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there are characters that make many different kinds of decisions that determine their role in the book. In the play, the protagonist Hamlet, after his father’s death, is angry about his mother’s hasty marriage to Claudius. He sees a ghost of his father one night and tells him that Claudius had murdered him. Hamlet plans to kill Claudius but he has trouble making decisions and throughout the play, his poor decision making skills bring downfall to himself and many others. Every tragic hero has a tragic flaw and Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his inability to make decisions.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear makes many mistakes that lead him to his own doom. His first mistake is paying more attention to his daughters’ pretty words than their actual personalities and aims. When deciding how to divide his kingdom amongst his daughters, King Lear asks them the question: “Which of you shall we say doth love us most?” (line 50.1144) Lear’s intentions are genuine; he only wishes to divide his kingdom fairly among his daughters and give them all individual dowries. Lear’s eldest daughters, Goneril and Regan, proclaim their love for him with extravagant and very flattering speeches. Cordelia, Lear’s third daughter, does not use flattery. She is honest with her father saying, “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth, I love your majesty / According to my bond; nor more nor less” (91-93.1145). Lear expects the extravagance and flattery he received from the others. His expectations cause him to overlook the greedy selfishness of Goneril and Regan and the selfless love of Cordelia.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mercy truly is the fundamental characteristic to civilized human life. Mercy in other words is compassion shown by one person to another or a request from one person to another to be shown, such as unwarranted compassion for a crime or wrongdoing. Without mercy, people who make mistakes would suffer or worse, die. If I had the choice to pick between Mercy and Justice it would be mercy. Mercy is the leniency, compassion, kindness and forgiveness given to a person by a higher authority. Mercy is more of a basic essential to civilized human life. I will show how mercy, not justice, is the highest value we have as a society. Mercy brings about proper resolution for everyone to benefit, whereas justice is just a solo person or majority that would benefit without having to sacrifice anyone’s’ life.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act One, Scene One, Shakespeare juxtaposes Gonerill and Regan’s “large speeches … and words of love” with Cordelia’s response of “Nothing.” Lear, in casting Cordelia out, fails in his filial duty and thereby betrays his youngest daughter. This is mirrored between Edgar and Gloucester, with Gloucester proclaiming death upon his son without first considering the treachery at hand from Edgar, with this action also failing in his role as a father. Gloucester proclaims “…treachery, and all ruinous disorders, follow us disquietly to our graves.” This foreshadows the future betrayal that will take place between Lear and his family. Gloucester also states that “Love cools, friendship falls off, brothers divide, son against father, and father against child”, ironically, Gloucester does not realize that the son he should be referring to is Edmund. However, Lear and Gloucester’s actions may be excused, due to senility as well as their good intentions, yet both Edmund and Lear’s daughters act completely in selfish desire. For example, in Act Two, Scene Three, Regan’s line “what need one?” strips Lear of all his former power, as well as representing the ultimate betrayal by Lear’s daughters. In the hovel, Lear realizes his mistake, commenting “Hast thou given all to thy two daughters? And art thou come to this?”…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear is framed by two grand public scenes, filled with rituals and ceremonies that call attention to the conventional aspects of political justice as normally practiced. In Act I, scene i, Lear tries to go beyond the limits of conventional justice, while still maintaining the cover of ritual and ceremony to implement his plan. With years of practice under his belt, Lear masterfully plays the role of king until Cordelia disrupts the proceedings. Everyone in court seems willing to play their conventional roles as obedient daughters, loyal subjects, ardent suitors and so on. Lear is aware of the fact of passing the crown to the eldest of his children Goneril and is smart enough to foresee the problems if the former becomes the sole successor. Ensuring ‘that future strife’ Lear apparently planned the unconventional love test and to spend the rest of his life in the ‘kind nursery’ of Cordelia. But Lear evidently…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have different opinions about the definition of love, and whether a couple is truly in love or not. For instance, the play A Midsummer Night’s Dream, by William Shakespeare, portrays the life of four young Athenian lovers who struggle to find their soulmates. As Oberon, the king of fairies, tries to help the four lovers by using a love potion to match the right couples, more chaos is caused between them. In addition, Oberon also tries to steal his wife’s, Titania, adopted kid because he wants to make him one of his knights. This couple encounters many arguments throughout the play, but, as the story unfolds, the two fairies are shown to be truly in love, as they have a longstanding and a sustainable, strong love.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays