Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King Lear, Shakespeare Tragedy

Powerful Essays
1993 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear, Shakespeare Tragedy
A true tragedy has a very serious tone by which many sorrowful events lead to some kind of death. In literature, tragedy can often seem very dry due to the reader most likely knowing the ending. But often, the author uses different content and styles of writing to further develop the story beyond what is actually being read. Some examples of these methods are the use parallel plots, themes, and imagery. A parallel plot can be used to help support the main plot of the story, and themes or imagery are often used to help the reader picture what a certain character might be experiencing. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear, the reader is better able to understand the content of the story through the author’s thorough use of imagery, themes, as well as its parallel plot. These techniques allow each individual reader to interpret the story in their own way. The use of a parallel plot allows the author to enhance the meaning or idea that is trying to be reached in the story. Sharing common themes between the two plots can aid in this idea. The plot with King Lear having the same themes as the plot with the Earl of Gloucester truly develops the story as a whole. Shakespeare probably realized having the two plots share themes would enforce the points he was trying to reach. An example of a common theme shared is the conflicting relationship between father and child. Lear starts the entire dilemma of hate and destruction by his desire for flattery. It can be assumed from the play 's title, Lear and his daughters are part of the main plot, whereas the plot of Gloucester and his sons is considered parallel. Gloucester 's plot acts as an echo since it repeats some of the events and thoughts which took place earlier, only it uses different characters and settings. Shakespeare probably planned this so he could introduce an idea then support it later through each plot point. Literary critic, Harold Bloom would agree, “The Gloucester subplot may be said to work deliberately against Lear’s Jobean sense of his own uniqueness as a sufferer;”(2). The use of Gloucester 's plot in the play gives the reader an opportunity to experience the problem and its answers not just once, but twice. The reader can catch up on any previously overlooked points even though different characters and situations are presented. From the beginning, Shakespeare allows the reader to explore an idea of King Lear without any prior background to his character. In the first scene when Lear has each daughter express their love, Goneril first introduces Lear 's state of symbolic blindness. “Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter; dearer than eyesight, space and liberty...”(KL 1.1.57-64). At this point, the reader can see Goneril 's true personality, and King Lear 's lack of perception. It 's not until all three daughters ' speeches are given that the reader can truly understand to King Lear 's blindness. It is Goneril and Regan 's speeches that blind King Lear from understanding and accepting Cordelia 's true expression of love. “Noting will come of nothing. Speak again”(KL 1.1.92). It is King Lear 's distorted mindset that leaves him in the dark from what is the truth. Cordelia 's speech challenges King Lear 's intelligence and portrays him as being less powerful. It is after this initial blindness that drives King Lear to begin to make many mistakes. Literary critic G. Wilson Knight agrees, “Lear starts his own tragedy by a foolish misjudgment”(13). He not only loses his daughter, but he also loses his most loyal friend, Kent. “Come not between the Dragon and his wrath. I loved her most, and though to set my rest on her kind nursery. Hence and avoid my sight”(KL 1.1.124-126) This show that King Lear can admit to his own wish for peace and rest but, he cannot acknowledge the fact that both Cordelia and he are being stubborn to not allow love except on their own terms. It is strange how Shakespeare made the reader aware of Cordelia 's knowledge of King Lear 's blindness but she doesn’t make it known to him. It seems Cordelia does a poor job to sell the fact she truly loves her father. Even when Cordelia does speak again, she does not go any further than saying that it is her duty to love Lear. “You have begot me, bred me, loved me. I return those duties back as are right fit, obey you, love you, and most honor you”(KL 1.1.98-100). Though she tells that she only loves her father because she has to, it can be clearly read through that she is more true to him than her sisters. The theme of lack of sight is mimicked in the paralleling plot with the Earl of Gloucester. Gloucester like Lear is challenged by Edgar 's mistrust. “O villain, villain! His very opinion in the letter”(KL 1.2.80). In the blind panic of hurt and fear, Gloucester is easily persuaded and doubts his own son’s loyalty, even though he has no evidence. This shows the reader how much Gloucester relies on others to make up his mind for him. Gloucester like Lear is blinded by his son 's betrayal and is not able to see the truth until Regan and Cornwall physically blind him. The Earl of Gloucester and King Lear are both similar in weakness in that both can’t see past their own ill-sense of truth. Throughout King Lear is there is another dominant theme of deceit and betrayal. Since this is a tragedy, this theme is shown in the few lines. It seems as if Shakespeare often used these themes in his tragedies to set the mood. The reader is first introduced to this theme through Goneril and Regan and their hatred for their father. This becomes the center of the play and also leads to the madness that Lear suffers from. G. Wilson Knight states, “His purgatory is to be a purgatory of the mind, of madness”(13). Knight’s statement proves that Lear is ultimately in his own world of insanity. The first words that Goneril speaks are empty and are opposite of what she really feels. “…A love that makes breathe poor, and speech unable”(KL 1.1.62-3). The reason why there are no words to express her love for her father is that she has no love for him. The same goes for her sister, Regan, who is plotting against her father as well. She says that she feels the same way as her sister but tells that she loves Lear more than her sisters and that Goneril 's affection for her father, “…Only she comes too short”(KL 1.1.74). By saying this, Regan shows that her love is even less true than that of her sister’s. She goes even farther to say, “...that I profess myself an enemy to all other joys which the most precious square of sense possesses and find I am alone felicitate In your dear Highness’ love”(KL 1.1.74-9). This proves Regan to be even greedier than her sister and that her words are more false. In the parallel plot, another deceitful person is Edmund. In the beginning of Act 2 he draws his sword on Edgar and tells him to pretend like he is protecting himself because he hears Gloucester coming. Edmund states, “I hear my father coming. Pardon me: In cunning I must draw my sword upon you. Draw, seem to defend yourself; now quit you well. Yield! Come before my father! Light ho, here! Fly, brother. Torches, torches! -So, farewell”(KL 2.1.30-4). Edmund tells Gloucester that he was attacked by Edgar and that he even drew blood from Edmund. The motive behind this is greed and envy. Edmund has no love for hid father and is envious of the fact that he will not inherit any title from Gloucester. Edmund goes on to say, “With his prepared sword he charges home my unprovided body, latched mine arm; But when he saw my best alarumed spirits bold in the quarrel 's right, roused to th ' encounter, or whether gasted by the noise I made, Full suddenly he fled”(KL 2.1.54-9). He greedily deceives Gloucester and gets him to sympathize by incriminating Edgar. This shows how Edmund is just as evil as Goneril and Regan. Shakespeare seems as if he wanted to really illustrate the similarities between Edmund, Regan, and Goneril buy showing how they play the victim but are truly aren’t. Michael J. Warren describes, “As Edmund, dedication to an ideal…a dangerous self-righteousness that must exercise itself on others”(52). Warren tells of how Edmund’s self involved nature is dangerous to others, proving true with the gain of his fathers thrown. Throughout both plots of King Lear, the children’s’ plan to overthrow their father proves a motive greed, deceit, lack of feeling, and betrayal. The central theme throughout King Lear would probably be the suffering or some kind of unhappiness of the characters. Shakespeare always seems to have his characters suffer in some kind of unhappiness in all of his tragedies and that suffering leads to death. When King Lear is thrown out of his daughters ' homes and left with a fool, he realizes his mistake and suffers the banishment of his two eldest daughters. Lear also suffers from lack of rest when he is moving all over the place and the thing that breaks him is the death of his youngest daughter, Cordelia. Lear states, “And my poor fool is hanged: no, no, no life? Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, and thou no breath at all? Thou 'lt come no more, never, never, never, never, never"(KL 5.3.306-10). The pain and suffering endured by Lear eventually tears down his strength and sanity. Lear is not as strong, arrogant, and prideful as he was in the beginning of the play instead he is weak, scared, and unhappy old man. Another feeling of unhappiness/suffering is when King Lear is shouting during the storm, “I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness. I never gave you kingdom, called you children, you owe me no subscription”(KL 3.2.16-8). He was suffering because he felt that he didn 't deserve what he had received from his two daughters. The fall of Lear is not just the suffering of one man but the suffering of everyone around him. Critics from Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare tell, “Lear, however, has seen too much in life to remain in this world, and his death is as appropriate as it is inevitable”(196). Due to his fall as king, King Lear ultimately has no more reason to live anyhow because he has nothing to live for. In conclusion, King Lear accomplishes the task of being a tragedy because it is a clear series of events that lead to death. Shakespeare does a great job of emphasizing the need for a parallel plot to better grasp the many meanings of King Lear. Using the many themes and ideas to better enhance this story truly make this a great tragedy. By thoroughly illustrating these ideas, Shakespeare causes the reader to read more into what is behind the text to gain a better understanding of the play as a whole. Works Cited

Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman, and William Burto. “The Plot of Tragedy Best Suits King Lear.” Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1996. 194-97.
Bloom, Harold. Introduction. William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 1-8
Knight, G. Wilson. “King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque.” William Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1985. 11-26
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Russell Fraser. New York: Signet, 1998
Warren, Michael J. “Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Edgar and Albany.” William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 45-56.

Cited: Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman, and William Burto. “The Plot of Tragedy Best Suits King Lear.” Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1996. 194-97. Bloom, Harold. Introduction. William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 1-8 Knight, G. Wilson. “King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque.” William Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1985. 11-26 Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Russell Fraser. New York: Signet, 1998 Warren, Michael J. “Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Edgar and Albany.” William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 45-56.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of King Lear, being a shakespearean tragedy, suffering, loss, and injustice are all factors often expected before an audience enters the bottomless pit of complicated characters, varying agendas, and Shakespearean english these productions usually employed. However, despite its melancholy undertone and lack of warmer lighting gels on stage, King Lear is not without hope.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s tragic works are notably characterized by the hamartia of their protagonists. This tragic flaw is a defect in character that brings about an error in action, eventually leading to the characters imminent downfall. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, written in 1606, the King’s hamartia proves to be his extreme rashness, which results in the loss of most everything that he holds dear, including his authority, his affluence and his family. The reasons for his downfall lie within the flaws of his own character, made evident by his insatiable need for flattery and his egotistical fixations.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It first became clear that Shakespeare's King Lear and Laurence's Hagar Shipley were similar main characters when their personalities were developed with flaws. King Lear was immediately revealed as an imperfect character when he was shown in his somewhat conflicting roles as a father and a king. After resolving to divide his kingdom amongst his three daughters Lear develops a way to decide how his power and land will be divided. Looking to his three children Lear probes, "Tell me, my daughters/ (Since now we will divest us both of rule,/ Interest of territory, cares of state),/ Which of you shall we say doth love us most?/ That we our largest bounty may extend/ Where nature doth with merit challenge."(I.i.49-54) It is at this point in the play that King Lear…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeares The Tragedy of King Lear has been carefully constructed to create a domino effect: had Cordelia said more than nothing, had Gloucester spoken to Edgar about the letter, and if Edgar had not decided to become a beggar he may not have been able to save his father. Harmatia is thus present as the audience wonders what would have happened had Edmond not ordered Cordelia to be killed. Hence the hand of fate or more appropriately, the hand of the playwright is evident and draws the audiences attention to the immense suffering of humanity and to the idea of redemption. Though Shakespeare created the play with the purpose of eliciting Catharsis within the audience there is the idea that he took it too far. A.C Bradley challenges the integrity of King Lears cathartic ending; surely the tragic outcome of Lears error and his daughters ingratitude has been made clear enough and moving enough with a tragedy this should seem inevitable. But this does not. It is not even satisfactorily motivated. In fact it seems expressly designed to fall suddenly like a bolt from a sky created by the vanished storm. Clearly he believes that the conclusion was overdone as there were far too many dead bodies on the stage and as the play became more horrific and gruesome the cathartic elements were minimised.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear was written around 1603-06. A contextualised political reading interprets King Lear as a drama that gives expression to crucial political and social issues of its time: the hierarchy of the Jacobean state, King James' belief in his divine right to rule, and the political anxieties that characterised the end of Queen Elizabeth's reign: fears of civil war and division of the kingdom triggered by growth of conflicting fractions and a threatening underclass.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anger and Shakespeare

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Whilst the study of anger forms the central focus of King Lear, Shakespeare explores a number of related problems, such as punctured ego, anger and old age, anger and judgement, justice and so on. This play is a rare amalgamation of goodness, madness and death, all resulting from a deep seated pride and ire. It thus makes it thorny to decide which triumphs in the end.…

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s King Lear is a timeless play whose textual integrity lends itself to a variety of interpretations and in exploring the human condition the text remains relevant across a wide range of contexts. It is possible to present the text as exploring and affirming the human condition, where humanity is defined as the ability to love and empathise. However, in the same instance, a nihilist perspective, such as Peter Brooke’s 1971 production of King Lear, challenges this by outlining that humanity as an imaginary ideal.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the Jacobean period after King James I of England came to the throne. Tragedies, which centre around dysfunctional families or couples such as Euripides’ Medea, focus on human suffering and require a high status protagonist to make a tragic mistake due to a flaw in his character which makes him human. King Lear’s tragic character flaw is arrogance and in some ways gullibility as he believes his daughters, Regan and Goneril, when they flatter him to gain a share of the kingdom. The key element for tragedies is the protagonist has to die shortly after recognising his error. It is typical for the audience to cry, giving them a cathartic experience.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Who thought Lear to be “A prime example of the absurd”? Comments on how twentieth century critics often try to put King Lear.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revenge Cycle

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Revenge has the definition of taking vengeance for injuries or wrongs; retaliation. In the Hamlet, the main theme is that when people follow plans of revenge, it leads to tragedy. Throughout the play, several different people want to take revenge on somebody. Hamlet is a main character who is being asked to take revenge on his uncle to fulfill his duty as a son. Hamlet by William Shakespeare is a revenge tragedy because Laertes and Fortinbras and Hamlet seek to avenge a family death, in most cases the death of their father and in all but one case leads to their own tragic death.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Satisfying, hopeful, and redemptive: some critics would say that these adjectives belong nowhere near a description of King Lear. One critic, Thomas Roche, even states that the play’s ending is “as bleak and unrewarding as man can reach outside the gates of hell” (164). Certainly, Roche’s pessimistic interpretation has merit; after all, Lear has seen nearly everyone he once cared for die before dying himself. Although this aspect of the play is true, agreeing with this negative view requires a person to believe that Lear learns nothing and that he suffers and dies in vain. Indeed, this is exactly what Roche believes when he states that at the play’s end, “Lear still cannot tell good from evil . . . or true from false” (164). This nihilistic approach, however, not only disregards many of the play’s moments of philosophical insight, but it also completely misinterprets Shakespeare’s intent. That is not to say that Lear is without fault at the end of the play; as Shakespeare surely understood, Lear is still human, and as such, he is subject to human frailty. What is most important about Lear, however, is not that he dies a flawed man but that he dies an improved man. Therefore, although King Lear might first appear “bleak,” Shakespeare suggests that Lear’s life, and human life in general, is worth all of its misery because it is often through suffering that people gain knowledge about the true nature of their individual selves and about the nature of all humanity (Roche 164).…

    • 3447 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Gods Are Just- King Lear

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The malignant ferocity and human cruelty found in ‘King Lear’ has lead some contemporary critics such as Stephen Greenblatt to deem Shakespeare “a decisively secular dramatist”. The play is often viewed as the most tragic and disaster ridden of all of Shakespeare’s tragedies. The tragic events that prevail throughout the play create the impression that there can be no form of justice or providence. At the conclusion of the play Cordelia is hung and King Lear dies in a delusional state of mind. Samuel Johnson considered this ending to be a violation of poetic justice. Virtuous ‘good’ characters traditionally survive in such tragedies. Shakespeare created an apparently clear division between the good characters that the audience should empathise with, and those who are “evil”. The character of the king merges the ideas of good and evil in the play. Tragedy resonates throughout ‘King Lear’, affecting all of the characters; both the “evil” and the “good”. Edgar’s assertion that “ The gods are just, and of our pleasant vices make instruments to plague us” raises a principal question from a modern audience’s perspective of whether the cruel painfully pernicious treatment of King Lear, and in parallel of Gloucester, can be justified.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, Tucker Brooke, and William Lyon Phelps. _The Tragedy of King Lear_. New…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays