Preview

Kerrie's Challenge Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kerrie's Challenge Case Summary
In the case of Kerrie's Challenge: Leading a unpopular change it exemplifies a direct violation of Henry Fayol's unity of direction principle. The unity of direction principle states that all members of a group work towards the same objective (Lester, 2006).Kerrie's team members all learn of the changes that had to be made immediately, but not all of them agreed with Kerrie's decision. Her decision not only had team member disagreeing but it also impacted Kerrie's relationship with her team mates. Kerrie tried to overcome this by trying to listen to the members opinions and concerns and even considering them. Regardless of any frustration Kerrie understood the importance of coming together and operating as a team for the sake of the the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    anita cobby case

    • 1873 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Recently, an interesting case of murder involving a young married woman was unravelled by the crime scene team. The collection of evidence and laboratory examination of exhibits provided the corroborative evidence necessary to prove the victim’s in-laws were trying to mislead the Investigating Officer by fabricating a story of looting and murder…

    • 1873 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ella Jones Case Summary

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 16, 2008 a lady name Ella Jones was murdered in her own home. She was stabbed to death and suffered from internal bleeding. The neighbor next door over heard the altercation but he didn’t think anything of it. He then went back to sleep and decided to check on her in the morning like he always does. That morning he went to see if she was okay, as he walked over there he noticed the door was open. He quickly became aware of Ella’s death. He ran back home to call the police. The police and the homicide detectives arrived to investigate the scene twenty minutes later. The homicide detective discovered she was dragged thrown and beat down the stairs. Which that was giving her head trauma, then she gets cut around the neck in her kitchen. They go to the station to log evidence and uncover more information about the murder. The neighbor came into the station and told the police, he believes he know who killed Ella. He said, " it was her boyfriend…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, we are here today to decide the verdict of an alleged aggravated sexual assault on January 8th, 2010. The plaintiff, Ms. Shirley Thompson, states that my client, Mr. Michael Miller, abducted her at knife point and raped her twice. My client has given a statement that he did in fact have sexual intercourse with her, but it was consensual.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 6 years of imprisonment, Lindy Chamberlain was released from prison due to new evidence of which suggested that she was an innocent woman. The conduct of the legal system throughout this case demonstrated flaws of which led to the false accusation and the arrest of Lindy Chamberlain. Several aspects of the case created difficulties of the management of the case including; the involvement of the media, the collection of the evidence, the Jury and the presentation of evidence in the court. The Lindy Chamberlain Case began in 1980 and did not become resolved until more than 3 decades later.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For example, cohesiveness is seen when Jim obtains Pam an interview in the same city he is in. It seemed their goal was to get her to Philadelphia so that they could be together. In the end she did not take the job that she knew was not right for her and could not stay even though she wanted too. Put in this same situation, I would have made the same choice. Another example of cohesiveness is seen when everyone in the office is aware of Meredith and Pete dating but Andy is left out of the loop. Everyone seems to agree that they make a good couple and kept it a secret to spare Andy’s feelings. In this instance, I would have minded my own business too. I make it a point not to get involved in others personal relationships. In another example, the group appeared to all be in agreement on how to handle a situation when they decide, as a group, not to partake in the cupcakes by a former coworker. But nobody keeps their word and they eat the tainted cupcakes backfiring on them all. In general, I have found that going along with what the majority want, in an office setting, makes for a much easier work…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My team consisted of six members. We started our discussion by taking a poll. We were split equally between Kristin and Suzanne. Since nobody supported Nancy, we dropped her profile from our discussion. Then, the two sides tried to convince each other with their choice. We both performed a reaction known as the commitment and consistency principle, which explains that “a person who takes a stand encounters pressures to behave consistently with that commitment”.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay was interesting, however it lacked a few details that could help readers better profit Mary Patterson. This essay allowed the ideas for pro-life stance to be explained without offending anyone or discouraging those who do support pro-choice. Abortion is always a touchy subject because people are always very passionate about it, but this essay didn’t necessarily take a stand on a side. The essay only highlighted what one individual did to help her cause and what motivated her actions.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 650 Criteria 2

    • 3528 Words
    • 12 Pages

    ‘Participative’ theory suggests that the ideal leadership style is one that takes the input of others into account. This type of leader encourages participation and contribution from team members, making the team members feel more involved and therefore committed to the decision making process. The theory is that team members will also collaborate rather than compete, as they are working on jointly agreed goals. I have experienced members of my staff team jointly working on recent updates of care plans and it can still become competitive, over who has completed the most, first to complete or had the biggest input.…

    • 3528 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xcom 285 Wk 6 Checkpoint

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When working in a group, conflicts usually arise and should be dealt with immediately and directly. Ignoring conflict or disagreements will cause the team to be lose focus, become less productive. Most conflicts result from poor communication and misinterpretations. To resolve conflicts, it is important to locate where the break-down in communication happened. By talking through the conflict with the members of the group, and redefining tasks and objectives, the team can resolve these types of issues. To foster good communication within a group every member must listen to each other, work collaboratively to make decisions, adapt to changes and communication styles, assign specific tasks, set clear deadlines and expectations, and conduct follow-up meetings to…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our company is one of those believers in teamwork but Hackman argues that most company has misconceptions on teamwork. The first misconception that Hackman mentions is on “harmony.” Many companies feels that if a team has smooth interaction it would avoid wasting time and having debates on how to proceed. (Hackman, 2011) According to Hackman (2011), “Conflict, when well managed and focused on a team’s objectives, can generate more creative solutions than one sees in conflict-free groups.” Conflict and constructive criticism seems to bring out great ideas and help see more than one point of view. The second misconception that Hackman mention was “mixing it up.” According to Hackman (2011), the longer members stay together as an intact group, the better they do. As an employee who participates in groups it easier to continue to work with the same people because you get to know and learn the people in the group which helps with knowing their triggers and fuses. When adding new people to an existing group or changing team could possibly prolong the project because now that team has to reacquaint themselves with each other as well…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we had a group controversy we handled it by listening to others then using the process of elimination or by voting on it. Although, we had a few stubborn people that really wanted their idea rather than others. I think most of the team was more lenient in going along just to avoid controversy so others gave in order to accomplish the task.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TDA 2.6 1.1

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that for any team to be successful it requires those people to have common/collective understanding of what their aims and objectives are.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    learning team charter

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sarah Dowling- It is our goal as a team to work collaboratively to ensure all members’ thoughts, ideas, and input are shared, discussed, considered, and incorporated into the learning team assignments and projects. It is people’s duty to be accountable for his or her individual portion of the project and to strive to do their personal best. As a group we will seek out opportunities within each other’s strengths to improve our quality of work and assist those team members who may struggle to do so. In the event disagreement occurs between cohorts in regards to any one idea, including but not limited to: substance, quality, or timeline of work submitted, team members will vote to decide if the individual/ idea will continue to work with the group or project. Each member must be committed to the team’s academic achievement and success.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Katko v. Briney was a battery tort case that occurred in Iowa in 1971. The plaintiff, Marvin Katko was illegally infringing on private farmland and entered a farmhouse with signs warning “No Trespassing”. This farmhouse had been victim to several past burglaries and the owner, defendant Edward Briney wanted to take this issue up on himself. Briney installed a homemade trap composing of his 20 gauge spring-loaded shotgun to a bedroom door. Whoever was to open the booby-trapped door, would be shot in the legs, avoiding any fatal consequences. Marvin Katko illegally trespassed the farmhouse with the intention of collecting bottles and antiques from the house. Katko regretfully opened the trapdoor, injuring himself and needed to be hospitalized. Katko sued for damages against Briney. By inflicting deadly force on another individual, this case become more of human rights issue than a potential trespassing violation. Certain inquiry that the Supreme Court of Iowa may have had would be in regard to if deadly force within private property is permissible to protect and secure private space. Also the court must ask, to what extent and in what situation is using such deadly force within your rights allowed. According to the Prosper on Torts, it states that “the law has always placed a higher value upon human safety than upon mere rights in property, it is the accepted rule that there is no privilege to use any force calculated to cause death or serious bodily injury to repel the threat to land or chattels, unless there is also such a threat to the defendant's personal safety as to justify a self-defense.” The court came to the clear conclusion that “No privilege exists to use force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to prevent trespass to land or chattels unless the trespass threatens death or great bodily harm to the occupier or user of the land or chattel.” The reasoning behind why the court decided the case this way was…

    • 407 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They do not want to engage or give input on the task, and will do whatever is decided amongst the other team members. Teams need the pairing statements and wanting respect. The pairing statements can come from having a good relationship with your team. Having team building events can get the team closer and get to know each other. Counter pairing is good to a point, where business is business and nothing is personal. However, you have to have a business and personal relationship with your team members to be a successful team. The work statements are the most important. You have to have these statements or why are you in a group at all. We all come together to make sure we are all on the same page on the tasks that need to be done to get to reach the successful end goals. Lastly, unscorable statements are those that come from the quiet person or the person that does not really understand what the team is trying to accomplish. None of the people on the team might not understand what this person is trying to say. To be successful with your team, communication and relationships are most important. A good team works together as one and all wants to achieve…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays