Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Kentucky Virginia Resolutions

Good Essays
1084 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kentucky Virginia Resolutions
Mike Hamrock
APUSH Semester Essay
12/13/12

Throughout the early days of the United States of America, when the nation was beginning to take structural form, the power of the national government increased greatly. Much of this is due to the Federalist ideas present by our first President George Washington, and other prominent founding fathers such as Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The Federalist position, which supported a strong central government favoring power to the national or federal government, was very prominent in the early days, however it was not unopposed. With the growing power of the national government, those known as Anti-Federalists entered the picture. Anti-Federalists favored power to the states, and sought a weak central government in order to ensure the right of individuals in the nation. Later Anti-Federalists formed the Democratic-Republican Party headed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. It was through the actions of the members of the Democratic-Republicans, through events including The Whiskey Rebellion of 1794, and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, that they were effective in decreasing the size of the federal government, ensuring individual rights to the people of the U.S. and stealing power away from the Federalist Party. It is James Madison who is most commonly referred to as the Father of the Constitution. Madison, being a Democratic-Republican in favor of the rights to the states, pushed for a more state favored Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist Party, was extremely opposed to state power, especially majority state power. The Federalist position had been prominent in politics during the very early years of the nation, through Federalist presidents George Washington and John Adams. It was under the administration of George Washington in 1794, that great opposition to the federalist position came into play. In the backwoods of Southwestern Pennsylvania the distillation of whiskey was a major part of the lifestyle, to the point where it was even used as money in some occasions. It was in 1791 that Alexander Hamilton placed an excise tax on few domestic items, most notably whiskey. This greatly enraged distillers in Pennsylvania to the point of a small rebellion, where whiskey poles were established, and the chant “Liberty and No Excise” could be heard throughout. It was George Washington, with great encouragement from Hamilton that he summoned several state militias into a force of about 13,000 men to put down the very small rebellion. This was a very questionable act by a recent revolutionary, and was opposed primarily by anti-federalists. By Washington showing such great force on such a small mutiny, he strengthened not only his executive power, but he was in violation of the Constitutions right to assembly. This was greatly argued by the foes of his party being anti-federalists and newly developing political party the Democratic-Republicans. The Whiskey Rebellion was most successful in widening the gap between federalists and anti-federalists, and for the formation of the Democratic-Republicans, which marked the beginning of the still lasting two party political system in the United States. Thus the Whiskey Rebellion was effective in intensifying the opposition to Federalists in the United States. As time passed the gap between federalists and anti-federalists continued to widen, especially after the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, which were hated by Democratic-Republicans. The Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the predominantly Federalist Congress in order to minimize their opposition by the Democratic Republicans. First the Alien acts increased the number of years required to become a citizen of the U.S. from 5 years to 14 years. This was a violation of the traditional American policy of open door hospitality and assimilation. The discrimination towards immigrants didn’t stop there however, for Congress also passed legislation permitting the president to deport “dangerous” foreigners in times of peace, and also to deport or imprison them in times of hostility. This delegation of power to the executive branch was in direct violation to the Constitution. Then Congress passed the Sedition Act which stated that anyone who impeded the policies of the government, or falsely defamed its officials would be liable to heavy fine and imprisonment. This threw Democratic-Republicans into a rage as it directly violated the Constitution’s guaranteed powers of the freedom of speech, and of the press. The Sedition Act was enforced heavily upon Jeffersonian editors, as well as ordinary citizens of the Democratic-Republican Party, in which many were indicted for their words. As a result several joined the Democratic-Republican Party, many being converts from the Federalist Party. In response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, Jefferson and Madison drafted their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions respectively. Both Resolutions stated that the Alien and Sedition Acts broke the compact agreement made by the states and their agent the federal government. Through this they also stated that the federal government had violated the powers granted to them by the Constitution, and that the nullification of the Acts was the rightful remedy for the states. Jefferson took a much more radical states rights stance than did Madison, however both ultimately reached the same goal, which was to reach a major opposition to Federalist views. Due to the extreme radical nature of the Resolutions they were not accepted by any other state legislature, however they did have influence on the increase of support for the Democratic-Republicans. This increase in support was very effective in providing more opposition to the Federalist Party and giving more power to the Democratic-Republicans in the upcoming election of 1800, in which Jefferson won. The conflicting views of the Democratic-Republican Party and the Federalist Party were major factors of determining the politics of the newly developing United States in the late 1700s. Federalists made up the majority of the House in the early years, and dominated the presidency for 12 years with George Washington, and John Adams. However through the very controversial actions of the Federalist Party, in regards to the Whiskey Rebellion, and the Alien and Sedition Acts, opposition to the Federalist Party grew substantially in the Democratic Republicans. It was ultimately through the policies of Jefferson and Madison, stated in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, that gave enough support to sway the power in Congress and of the Presidency to Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans. It was through this effectiveness that the Democratic-Republicans became a standing power in the politics of the time.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The General Argument made by Robert E. Shalhope in The Constitution and the Competing Political Cultures of Late-Eighteenth-Century America is that leading up to the 1787 Constitutional Convention there was political tension between the Federalist and Antifederalist about how the country would be governed. More Specifically, Shalhope argues that the Federalist thought that educated people should run the government and that the central government should have more power. While the Anti Federalists argued that the common people should be elected into the government, wealth should be widespread amongst the population, and that the state government should have more powers. The Federalists were mainly wealthy merchants and upper class men who have…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolution brought along much change in the now United States. Post war changes occurred in the republic, this included politics. One important event was that of the Constitutional Convention in which men formulated and revised state constitutions and also developed the method by which frames of government were written and approved. The status of women was being defined and the idea of abolition rose in the North. The central government’s power of the nation was too low. Unity and power lacked in the Confederation. National debt, trade, and protection against the Spanish and Brits were several of the problems facing the Confederation. Economic troubles also gloomed over the new developing country. A major issue dealt with paper currency and how quickly inflation had occurred. Shays Rebellion was an issues in which state governments would not come to the aid of debtors in New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and South Carolina. During the reformation of the constitution, the question was whether to amend the Articles of Confederation or to write a completely new one. The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two that were proposed. Conflict ensued between the states until the Great Compromise came to and established a bicameral congress which included the House of Representatives and the Senate. Men who fought against this new constitution were known as anti-federalists. But in the end the Federalists prevailed and the ratification of the Constitution…

    • 252 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hi list of my future

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Go to the following website in order to read the selected Federalist papers from the…

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most influential statesmen in the early republican period was James Madison. Madison was one of the patriots who wrote the Federalist Papers, which were responsible for the acceptance and eventual ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The papers brought up some of the main reasons why the Constitution ought to have been ratified, and many solutions to the evils that would potentially be faced by the United States. In his papers Madison drew attention especially to the concern of the tyranny of the majority and the possible solutions to his concern. He first considered where the problem stems with factions, but went on to look at solutions to the effect of factions because factions themselves were not his greatest…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, political parties, such as the Democratic-Republican and the Federalist Party, were formed. Democratic-Republican was created by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and the Federalist Party was created by Alexander Hamilton. The Whiskey Rebellion of 1974’s purpose was to the remove tax on whiskey in which federal revenue officials were tarred and feathered, riots were formed, and the threat of an assault on Pittsburgh. The results showed that the new government was capable of enacting laws and making sure they were enforced and obeyed. The government also had to provide protection in the western areas as settlers moved into those areas to establish farms, homes, and towns and cities.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A) James Madison was given the title “Father of the Constitution” because of his success in creating and writing the constitution. However he was not the sole creator of the constitution, but he was one of the main contributors to the document. He is widely known for the Virginia Plan, which brought forth many ideas that would be used in the Constitution. James Madison was such a huge contributor that in The Summer of 1787, it says “Never missing a day of the convention, never leaving chamber for more than ‘a casual fraction of an hour,’ Madison worked on his notes every evening throughout the sultry summer” (Stewart 48). In addition to his as his incredible strive for excellence, Madison was also the first delegate to arrive at the Convention…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists definantly protected the people of their country from tyranny. Before the federalists, the anti-federalists ruled the states, and they were very tyrannous. For example, they wanted all of the states to each take up a portion of the debt from the revolutionary war. This was easily payable by the larger states that had much industry, but for the smaller or less industrially developed states, this was a debt that they were just not able to handle. The federalists finally decided when they had the power that they would assume the debt as a part of a deal to move the capitol to Washington, D.C. This is just one example of how the anti-federalists tried to control the citizens while the federalists wanted to free the people and give them a chance to lead a free life. The federalist party definantly gave the people of the United States opportunity. The anti-federalists, however, did not. They not only jailed those in debt, but also they never set up a national bank to make loans so that people could cope with their debt. From setting up a national bank to helping people in debt, the federalists were able to lend money and keep people from being imprisoned for owing money. This allowed for the opportunity to grow and to expand to many of the…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had the support of people that were wealthy, such as businessmen. Democratic- Republicans had the support from the low class, such as farmers. Federalist party was considered the strong government while the weak government was the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalist became one of two first parties to ever exist in the United States. Political portion of the Federalist was to have a strong power nationality and not only states. Federalists allied with Britain to become a strong national government and bring forth the judicial and executive branches. The popular political views of the federalist are that they are in favor of, strong military, taxes, and tariffs for industries. Alexander Hamilton wanted to restore the government economic debt. In the way that he would do this is by creating IOUs, and repay everyone later. To make his IOUs work, he created the Whiskey Tax, so they can create the interest money to pay all the securities. ¬¬¬¬¬The Whiskey tax is an example of a tax law that was not arguable that it will help the states debt and the poverty that the U.S. was going through at time. Federalist hated Jefferson as president 1801, because he opposed every situation that the Federalist favored. That hatred rose up even further because of the Louisiana Purchase. They opposed to it because they bought it from France and they always preferred the British. The Democratic-Republican Party, was for rights of each…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays