Keller Was Bad For Me Essay
“Keller was bad for me, the worst possible teacher.” Do you agree?
Keller, as Paul’s piano teacher, was both a positive and negative influence in Paul’s life. It would be understandable for Paul to feel as if Keller “was bad for him, the worst possible teacher”, judging from the way he later narrates his life. Keller’s mysterious past and renunciation of music ruled his teaching style, subsequently suppressing Paul’s musical passion. In spite of this, it would be more reasonable to believe that Keller’s teaching methods suited Paul at the time of his “youthful arrogance” and kept him grounded. It is only when Keller almost departs Paul’s life entirely, that the adult Paul begins to realise and appreciate Keller for the great “Maestro” he was.
First impressions can often be misleading. Not used to being critised and having very disciplined lessons, Paul initially refers to Keller as a “Nazi”, failing to understand the word for what it really meant. However, Keller’s overly strict teaching style was not entirely professional. It was the result of …show more content…
Keller was inclined to teach Paul “everything [he was] able to learn” and Paul was determined to become a “concert pianist”, to attain the unattainable and be the “one in a million”. Paul would practice and practice, “playing till [his] hands ached”. Keller reassured him that it was not about winning, as “you never win by much”. For Paul to have advice and from someone of such distinction, would be considered an achievement in itself making Keller an impressive teacher in this sense. Although Keller realised that Paul could never be the best, he tried to save Paul from the misconception and asserted that it is better “a small hurt now than a wasted life”. In this, Keller’s repertoire of skills and advice benefited Paul during his youthful years and as a grown man, making him a good
Keller, as Paul’s piano teacher, was both a positive and negative influence in Paul’s life. It would be understandable for Paul to feel as if Keller “was bad for him, the worst possible teacher”, judging from the way he later narrates his life. Keller’s mysterious past and renunciation of music ruled his teaching style, subsequently suppressing Paul’s musical passion. In spite of this, it would be more reasonable to believe that Keller’s teaching methods suited Paul at the time of his “youthful arrogance” and kept him grounded. It is only when Keller almost departs Paul’s life entirely, that the adult Paul begins to realise and appreciate Keller for the great “Maestro” he was.
First impressions can often be misleading. Not used to being critised and having very disciplined lessons, Paul initially refers to Keller as a “Nazi”, failing to understand the word for what it really meant. However, Keller’s overly strict teaching style was not entirely professional. It was the result of …show more content…
Keller was inclined to teach Paul “everything [he was] able to learn” and Paul was determined to become a “concert pianist”, to attain the unattainable and be the “one in a million”. Paul would practice and practice, “playing till [his] hands ached”. Keller reassured him that it was not about winning, as “you never win by much”. For Paul to have advice and from someone of such distinction, would be considered an achievement in itself making Keller an impressive teacher in this sense. Although Keller realised that Paul could never be the best, he tried to save Paul from the misconception and asserted that it is better “a small hurt now than a wasted life”. In this, Keller’s repertoire of skills and advice benefited Paul during his youthful years and as a grown man, making him a good