Preview

Keaton Capital Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Keaton Capital Punishment
David Keaton almost faced the death penalty on the basis on mistaken identification. He was almost given capital punishment. The death penalty is a very serious consequence, and we have to try to stop it. The death penalty was first established in the eighteenth century B.C to give a more serious consequence to criminals. It has evolved since then. In the 1930s, executions reached the highest levels in American history, averaging 167 deaths per year. I think the death penalty should be banned. There are so many reasons why capital punishment is unfair and dangerous including, it puts innocent lives at risk, it goes against most religions, and it is very expensive. Judicial murder can put innocent lives at risk. David Keaton is an example of this. Everyone makes mistakes, in this case, that was the CSI who mistook him as someone …show more content…
This money comes out of our taxes. Cases without the use of death row costs roughly $740,00. Cases that do involve the death penalty costs around $1.26 million. In total, taxpayers pay $90,000 per year to pay for the cost of the death penalty. The fact that we are paying so much for something that we could go without is outrageous. We should be using this money that is going towards capital punishment for something more useful. Although the death penalty pushes discipline and severe consequences for the crimes that have been committed, life in prison is more humane and less expensive. Many victims feel that the death penalty can give them closure, knowing that the culprit is dead. When we convict someone of a crime, it is not right to kill them. Prison could change them. If you do not use the death penalty, their families could still visit and maintain a relationship with them. Knowing the negative facts of the death penalty, I would like to try to stop it. This issue could be taken to the General Assembly. As citizens, we can ban the death penalty in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The death penalty has always been a controversial topic in the United States. It is outlawed in 16 states, but it should be abolished in all fifty states. The act of the death penalty is irrational, costly, inhumane, and religiously immoral. Taking an individual’s life, because he/she murdered someone is senseless and is not a good representation of the United States.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Federal Government and state governments do not consider the lives of innocent men who were and currently are convicted of murder and sentenced to death. They think the court systems are flawless and if a jury finds one guilty, then the defendant is guilty no questions asked. The cases of Johnny D. McMillan and Ron Williamson prove the judicial system to be dead wrong. Pete Earley tells the story of Johnny D. McMillan in his nonfiction book, Circumstantial Evidence. The story of Johnny D. took place here in Monroeville, Alabama (Earley). He was falsely accused of the murder of Ronda Rene Morrison. He spent six years on death row and was finally released when it was proven that false testimony had put him in prison (Earley). No one from the prosecution or the state ever apologized to McMillan for his wrongful imprisonment (Earley). John Grisham tells Ron Williamson’s story in his nonfiction book, The Innocent Man. Ron Williamson, a former New York Yankee, was also falsely accused of murder (Grisham). Williamson was falsely accused of the murder of Debbie Carter in Ado, Oklahoma (Grisham). He spent eleven years on death row before he was finally proven innocent (Grisham). U.S. District court…

    • 1054 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnny Frank Garrett was executed for the rape and murder of an elderly nun on Halloween night in 1981. Garrett claimed his innocence from the time of his arrest until his dying breath. But still the state of Texas sentenced him to death in 1992, Texas has come under heavy criticism for allowing both a juvenile and mentally handicapped individual to be executed. Twelve years after his death, in 2004 the police found a DNA example which proved that Garrett was wrongfully sentenced to death.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Citizens’ tax money is used by courtrooms to carry out the executions. According to the article, Judge McCartin Turns against Death Penalty by Gordon Dillow explains the execution of inmates is: “It's a waste of time and taxpayers' money.” Judge McCartin acknowledges that, "It cost 10 times more to kill these guys than to keep them alive in prison.” Unfortunately, D.P cases occur a lot since the courtrooms come up with erroneous jurisdiction over inmates’ cases: The judicial system spends taxpayers money in revising documents, evidences, and appeals. For instance, the book Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean compares the prisoners’ execution costs more than life imprisonment in the state of Florida: “the cost of an each execution is approximately $3.18 million, compared to the cost of life imprisonment for (40 years) about $516,000” (129). These quotes assimilate in clarifying that it is cheaper to hold the inmates alive in prison rather than execute prisoners and invest high amounts of money on…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It takes only a $100 for a lethal injection and it takes over $47000 to keep someone in jail for a year. Multiply that with 25 and you $1175000 which are innocent citizens tax money which can go to something way better. $1175000 is only 25 years it's not even a life sentence. Which is another reason for the death penalty to be legal since canada's life sentence is only 25 years the criminals can come out of jail and try to hurt the victim's family for revenge.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty uses an unnecessary amount of America’s budget. The amount of money we spend on the death penalty could be put to better use. “Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 more than an ordinary…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another benefit of the death penalty is that it decreases crime. A study was done in states where the death penalty was enacted and for every execution, 14 people are deterred from committing a murder each year (Muhlhausen). When criminals see the high form of punishment murders receive, they are fearful of what consequences they would face if they performed a similar violent crime.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perspective the death penalty does not reach the minds of most criminals because a criminal rarely believes he/she could be caught. They hold a belief that they are intelligent enough to outsmart authorities. There is other whom holds such anger towards certain crimes that they believe death is a rightful punishment, but death does not “undo” a crime they have committed. I think it would be better for a criminal to think and reminisce their conscious. Their death would only put peace in their state of mind and except them from the punishments that prison holds for them. Families harmed by these criminals are sometimes frightened by the thought that they’re persecutor could escape and harm them again, however someone sentenced to life in parole in the united states has never escaped or been released. There is also a possibility that an innocent person could be convicted of a crime they did not commit, even with all our new technology and DNA testing there is always a chance of making a…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It provides a punishment and deterrent for someone who's already sentenced to life in prison.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life In Jail

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases". The process before being executed is much longer. In fact "Some prisoners have been on death row for well over 20 years"(Death penalty.org, 2008). This time on death row can vary, but usually it is more then 10 years (Death penalty.org, 2008). During that time of waiting on death row more and more money is being spent looking into the case to make sure everything is perfect and correct information is there. The amount of money spent on the person that is getting executed is over thousands more by the time the process is done. Executions cost "$2 million per person vs. $500,000 for life in prison without parole. If the death penalty was replaced with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, which costs millions less, more money, could go for things citizen really need. In fact; "the money saved could be spent on programs that actually improve the communities in which we live"(Death penalty, 2008). There are so many good things we could use the extra millions of dollars on including "education, roads, police officers and public safety programs, after-school programs, drug and alcohol treatment, child abuse prevention programs, mental health services, and services for crime victims and their families". All of this should be way more important in the grand schema of things. The state of California alone "could save $1 billion over five years by replacing the death penalty with permanent imprisonment." Having regular prisoners is so much cheaper. "California taxpayers pay $90,000 more per death row prisoner each year than on prisoners in regular…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been 158 exonerations in the US for the death penalty since 1973. That would have been 158 lives lost, 158 people knowing that they were innocent but couldn’t do anything about it. Capital crimes or capital offenses such as homicide and drug trafficking can result in the death penalty. Since 1999, death penalties have been mostly decreasing with only twenty of them in the year 2015. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States. The death penalty should not be allowed because no one has the right to end someone’s life, a wrongful execution wastes an enormous amount of money, and in cases of innocence, there is no way to correct the mistaken execution.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment, more commonly referred to as the death penalty, has been a highly debated topic in our country for quite some time. In 1972, the Supreme Court case, Furman V. Georgia deemed the death penalty unconstitutional in a 5-4 ruling (“Death Penalty”). After that, capital punishment stopped being used. However, the ruling was short lived. Gregg V. Georgia was a Supreme Court case in 1976 that reinstated the use of the death penalty (“Death Penalty”). As it is surrounded by controversy, many citizens debate if the death penalty should be legal in the United States. The death penalty should be illegal in all 50 states because: it is unconstitutional; criminals get special treatment; and innocent people…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the death penalty to be enforced there are many processes, which cost a lot of money, that take place over several years. The taxpayer, in most cases, pays all the costs of judges, attorneys, appeals, and courts over the whole course of the capital punishment trial. According to Michael Sage, a trial judge on a recent death penalty case, the cost will be three to four times more than the cost of a life-without-parole trial (“Cost”). In many states, the death penalty proves to be financially insufficient and negatively affects taxpayers through the cost of a death penalty trial. In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, which is about three times the cost of imprisoning someone for 40 years (“Facts”). The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases (“High”). Even though the death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison without parole, with some changes to the sentencing of a death penalty it could be an efficient method of dealing with capital punishment.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays