Preview

Karl Marx's Illusion Of The Working Class

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx's Illusion Of The Working Class
If Marx were alive, he would rebuke the mechanisms of unions and governmental regulations because it gives an illusion of false power for the working class. Marx states that within political practice, it is in the best interest to stay ‘against working class’, but he gives examples of how the bourgeoisie adjusts to current situations. He speaks of a “new class of petty bourgeoisie” in modern society that fluctuates its individual citizens between the two social classes, through competition, therefore limiting any chance of uprising. I believe that the capitalistic men, who are also elected to our governments by the working class (which is another illusion in on itself), compromised to cleaner working conditions and higher wages to allow unions …show more content…
Many industrial companies in first world countries saw wages sky rocketed to a decent amount for the worker, leaving two options for the capitalist; Raise prices on products to make up the difference, which would unevenly unfold across all markets at an unknowingly rate of time, or find an impoverish nation(s) to manufacture the same product at perhaps lower wages and number of workers. Many of these outsource nations have no regulations to protect the worker. If any work lack productivity, there are millions more willing to replace that person. Capitalist have no sympathy. Their main goal is to exploit the working class to gain capital, a product which requires per Marx, all members of society. So why is it that few benefit from this system? Marx details it very unfair for the proletariat to continue to be treated this way. No matter what the bourgeoisie promise to the proletariats, whether through unions or lawsuits, the proletariats should rise up and over throw the leading bourgeoisie and vanquish any class system. Communism is wishful thinking, but for now the capitalist have the upper

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “It is impossible for capitalists and laborers to have common interest.” The Second Industrial Revolution skyrocketed with new inventions and machines and changed how factories and jobs were worked. As the industries grew, so did the need for unions among the workers. To a certain degree the unions were successful in improving the position of the workers. They were not highly successful as they would be defeated and have to go back to square one, but mildly a success. Developing from the needs, the effects of the workers’ unions were successful.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the communist manifesto, Marx divides society into two main classes, the bourgeoisie, who are the owners of the means of production and employers of wage labourers, and the wage labourers themselves, the proletariat working class. The bourgeoisie, he claims, by their very capitalist nature, exploit the proletariat workers by unfairly controlling the wealth and means of production, thus forcing the proletarians to sell their only real asset, their labour in order to survive. Marx then goes on to argue that the proletarians must revolt against the capitalist society that treats them so unjustly in order to equally distribute the wealth and power. He reinforces this by saying, "Not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-the modern working class-the proletarians." (Ref. 2) and "Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product."(Ref 3) These statements would indicate that Marx regarded the proletarians to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism. But why does Marx regard them in this way?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution, factory workers received little pay, worked long hours, and never saw improvement in their living and working conditions. In the mean time, the middle class was emerging. They were rich because of the enormous amounts of money created in the country because of the Industrial Revolution. Marx thought that the capitalist system would eventually fail. He described communism as “a form of complete socialism in which the means of production--all land, mines, factories, railroads, and businesses—would be owned by the people” (649). He also thought all goods and services should be shared equally.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unions today are as necessary as they were during the Industrial Revolution. Unions ¡°are association of workers that combine forces and demand of different workers.¡± (R18) During the Industrial Revolution, the unions had certain demands such as higher wages, better working conditions, and less working hours, even though some countries, the developed countries do have those laws enforced, while the other countries don¡¯t have basic working rights. A large percentage of the countries don¡¯t have the basic working laws enforced, it is necessary for rest of the countries other than the developed ones to have unions to enforce the laws the workers deserve. Even though, the workers in developed countries have the basic working rights, unions are…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Marx’s view on trade union, the relationship of production in the Capitalism has two important sides, which is the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is the owner of market to produce products. Their goal is to increase their markets to have more money, surplus value, and wealth (Tucker, p.473). The proletariat is the worker who works for the bourgeoisie, but receive their wages based on their work (p. 473). Basically, workers produce the products using bourgeoisie’s material for the market.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Found It : ]

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If unions were going to work, striking would have to be effective, but they weren't. In the 1860's, the National Labor Union or NLU was formed by David Davis to unite workers in fighting for higher wages, an 8 hour work day and better working conditions, this set the stage for many failing unions to come. In 1877, railroad workers in this union took part in an enormous strike, The Great Railroad Strike, that resulted in mass violence across the country with not much impact made. Afterwords, an editorial in The New York Times talked about how the strike was hopeless, it was an act of resentful men. (Document B). With this failure, things such had come to a stop, however, year after year, strikes were breaking and little was being done in the workers favors. In 1892, workers at the Homestead Steel Plant near Pittsburg walked out on strike, The Homestead Strike, that cost the lives of at least two Pinkerton detectives and one civilian, among many other laborers deaths (Document G). The violent acts at Homestead failed to gain rights and since non-strikers were killed it led people to think of laborers in a negative way. Even though Unions formed to be effective in demanding for less hours and higher wages, the strikes formed didn't change much. Hours and Wages Of Industrial Workers had only very little improvement, during the 1860-1875, about 15 years there was a drop in the wages, during 1880-1891 there was in increase,…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 and the Railway Labor Act of 1951 basically paved the way for union corruption. Those acts in part, gave unions the right to exclusive representation in all 50 states. That means that once a union could certify that they had a simple majority of support for organizing as a unit, it then would speak for ALL covered workers, whether those workers voted for the union or not. Workers, who became disenfranchised with the union, did not have the right to form another union or invite in a different organization. They were stuck with what they had. As well, the government gave unions the absolute right to exact dues from workers, whether they wanted to pay them or not. Money, power and influence were squarely with the unions and made union treasuries easy pickings for union leaders and…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx describes the exploitation of the working classes/workers will always be in an inferior bargaining position to the owners when they contracting for wages and working conditions; the results are substance wages and brutal working conditions. “After labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly -- only then then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!” (Marx, “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” Section III, pg.3) Marx’s judgement on solely the proletariat being the oppressed and the bourgeois being the oppressors clouds the positive aspects of capitalism. The fact that one can have the potential to create upper development for oneself while benefiting others along the way is an outstanding idea. Marx misconstrues the idea of a capitalistic system, which is beneficial to both parties as being self-centered, when its actual intent is to keep everything in the workplace productive. I can agree that certain aspects of capitalism can affect those working at the ‘bottom of the chain’ per se, by limiting their ability to pursue leisurely activities when compared to those above them. Yet, there needs to be…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Response Paper

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Karl Marx, wages are a representation of one’s potential value of labor, however company owners necessarily get more money from one’s labor than an individual is paid in wages, for wages are based upon what is considered the minimal amount of money needed to sustain a worker’s life. This makes it a structural necessity in capitalism to feel as though we are paid less than the amount of work we put in. Given the author’s arguments, going through a retraining program in order to find a fulfilling career goes with Marx’s claim that we sell our labor for a wage in order to live, but he does not take into consideration the satisfaction received in a fulfilling career such as…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passing of time for human society. Karl Marx's views on Industrialization and the bourgeoisie had a major impact on how we view our industrial alignment today. Marx and Engel's The Communist Manifesto gives broad views on the subject of the middle class and how they fit into a society that was ruled by feudalism and aristocracy. Capitalism becomes a major topic in a socialist-based society that underwent many changes as industrialization progressed. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the change in society. At times aristocracy has refused to allow society to adapt to the changes that the bourgeoisie…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When workers are unionized they do not help the local governments, “public sector unions contribute to government bloat and to outsize compensation packages. As a result, they have created government inefficiency and bankrupted many local governments” (DiSalvo). The unions may help out the state and national government, but many local governments are affected a great deal by the unions. Many local governments are put out of businesses because they do not make enough money to afford the union fees. The local government does not have a high enough budget to afford the unions. They end up getting priced out by the state or national government, who have the high enough budget. Hence, forcing the local governments to go bankrupt. Continually, many high ranking positions in unions may not be doing their jobs correctly, but are still payed very well and will most likely not lose their jobs. In particular, “government managers generally get paid the same—and have the same likelihood of keeping their jobs—regardless of whether their operations are run efficiently” (DiSalvo). This quote shows that a government or business can be corrupt, but will most likely not get rid of the people who are corrupt because of the unions. The unions protect the rights of the workers, even the corrupt ones. This is a major problem for the government or business as it is not run as well as it could be. When the workers do not have to worry about losing their jobs, they will work less hard. Without the unions the workers feel more pressure to work harder or else they will lose their job. This creates more efficiency in the…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labor Unions

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Unions were formed initially for the common good and as a form of protection, but now they abuse their power to the detriment (disadvantage) of its members. When unions first came into existence in the 19th century, it was the beginning of the industrial revolution where workers moved away from agricultural work areas into factories and mines. In the process of this transition, many faced terrible working conditions: long hours, little pay, and health risks. Women and children who worked, generally received lower pay than men did, but even the men weren’t receiving enough for the amount of time they worked. The government did little to limit and resolve these injustices so therefore, labor movements raised; lobbying for better rights and working conditions; collective bargaining. This gave the workers…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx saw negativity within the economy; he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx states why there is a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. However it can be argued that these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn powered capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive. On the other hand radical social change would be inevitable according to Marx, society would enter a final period- communism. However this can be criticized as capitalism has only…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays