Preview

Karl Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
308 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx
Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim Views on Labor
During the 1800s there was clear and concise turmoil in regards to labor. Some viewed labor as a means to an end. It was a part of life with no implied passion. It was the only way to put food on the table and provide any additional support that was needed for families. Society, as we all know, had, or has, a set of rules and guidelines that one was to live by to maintain a place in the world. A place that if you dare objected you would be frowned upon. Here we will look at Karl Marx’s and Emile Durkheim’s views on labor.
In Karl Marx’s “Alienated Labor” he describes how the worker becomes so engrossed with the work that he loses himself. “The depreciation of the human world progresses in direct proportion to the increase in value of the world of things” (Marx 1977:4). The worker makes himself poorer while the rich get richer. He hustles and bustles to create a product that he cannot use himself. “The worker becomes a commodity that is all the cheaper the more commodities he creates” (Marx 1977:4).
Marx states that a consequence of this is that the worker relates to the product he helping to create as an alien object. The more he externalizes himself the more powerful the object becomes, therefore the poorer he becomes. Marx relates this to religion stating that “the more man puts into God, the less he retains in himself. The worker puts his life into the object and this means that it no longer belongs to him but the object” (1977:4). “As in religion the human imagination’s own activity, the activity of man’s head and heart, reacts independently on the individual as an alien activity of gods or devils, so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Walmart

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx, K. (2010). “Estranged Labor.” Pp. 32-38 in Social Theory: The Multicultural Readings (2010) edited…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx, although, believed the forces of production disenfranchised man from his ability to see nature in its grandeur. That is, nature in its beauty, has already existed in such form outside man's idealism and it is man's productive essence to work with the material around him that in turn recognised that beauty. Man`s natural work is warped by the unnatural forms of capitalist labour: the “superfluously coarse labours of life [make it so] its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them” (Thoreau, “Economy,” 2). Man’s drive is directed towards the desire of capital in “commerce” and “industry” (Marx, “Manifesto,” 210) which repurposes the labouring conscience of man’s “essence” (Ibid., “German Ideology,” 182) to the working “appendage of the machine” (Ibid., “Manifesto,”…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Industrial Revolution was a time of drastic change in the economic and social structures of the developed world. Factories and cities began to crop up all over to keep up with the rapid expansion pace of the time, and the living conditions of the middle and lower class quickly degraded with the increase of urban living. Society was soon divided into two classes: employers and laborers. The employers rapidly accumulated wealth and lived luxurious lifestyles while the laborers lived in complete filth and poverty. In Harding Davis’ Life in the Iron-Mills, the reader can clearly see the dehumanizing effects that the industrialization had on working individuals, and Marx’s idea of alienated labor coincides with Davis’ depiction of the daily…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Marx Alienation

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed in objectification when it came to labor, or essentially the outside/visible things we create are the workings of our internal thoughts—in my job, this is seen when I program accounts for our call takers as I make the visible (the account the agent works from) by thinking internally what the way to get the best functionality of the account would be. Marx though had some other theories about labor such as how work is a material thing, i.e. we farm for the food, we dig for the oil, etc. Marx believed that labor transforms us in terms of what we need, our level of self-consciousness, and so on. Marx though thought of work as the human need to work due to their needs—this is relatable as I work because I need to money, I need the money because I have bills and because I am in college. There is though an interesting topic that pretty much every job has that Marx thought of—alienation.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a country that lives off the back off capitalization, the majority of people wake up every morning to go to a job they either love or hate, for a wage of money to help them stay afloat in life. Majority of the jobs that are worked in this capitalizing society are jobs where someone is producing a product for someone over them who pay them. They do not produce the product for the benefit of themselves, but for the benefit of their employer. This is Marxian definition of alienating labor. Marx states Alienating labor estranges man’s own body from him, as it does external nature and his spiritual essence.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capitalists employ workers and they work through putting their efforts and then getting paid for supporting their families. How hard they work, how much degree they lost themselves, the more products they would produce. They always want to manufacture high quality products, as a result, the higher quality the products, the more they consuming themselves, finally, they are not the person they should being themselves anymore, and they are treated badly, and they would become coward and blunt. Consequently, the workers are become slaves of capitalists. In the common condition, it is our instinct to think that the people who put effort to produce, who owns the product of labor; but under society of capitalism, the main force is private ownership, as a result, the workers’ efforts are nothing or meaningless to themselves. It only has significant impacts to the capitalists. Alienation may occur in the form that many industrials have highly specialized functions on the assembly line and none can do the full job. Which reminds me a condition in 19th in china, during 19 to 20 century, since china becomes an important exporter so the country is growing fast and emerges a lot of manufacturing and technologic industries, which means a manufacturing industry may have over ten thousand workers. They work hard and the process of production is complex and enormous. There is a technologic company in Shenzhen named Foxconn has almost eight hundred thousand employees in China, and always occur suicide incidents because of the intense working speed and nervous working environment. I think the workers in this company are overly devoting themselves to the company and finally lost themselves in their own…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the production of a company increases, the workers sense of worth decreases. A political economy is supported by laws, land, wages and profits of labour without demonstrating their existence or connections. A laborer works for a wage that allows companies to produce a product that is then sold for a profit. Hence the laborer is a part of the process and becomes a commodity himself. The labour is objectified, and the worker is a slave to his labour. This brings about alienation for the laborer and his inner growth isn't realized. He becomes separated from himself and exists only as a worker who is lacking in personal worth. This also related inversely to an increase in a products worth. As the product becomes more important, the…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nra Gun Control

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx first expressed the idea, "The object that labor produces, its product, stands opposed to it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer."(Marx. 1) Most of us don 't own the tools and machinery we work with nor the products that we produce because they belong to the capitalist that hired us. But everything we work on and in at some point comes from human labor. The irony is that everywhere we turn, we are confronted with the work of our own hands and brains, and yet these products of our labor appear as things outside of us, and outside of our control. Work and the products of work dominate us, rather than the other way around. Rather than being a place to fulfill our potential, the workplace is merely a place we are compelled to go in order to obtain money to buy the things we need. "Hence," Marx wrote, "the worker feels himself only when he is not working; when he is working, he does not feel himself. He is at home when he is not working, and not at home when he is working. His labor is, therefore, not voluntary but forced, it is forced labor ' '( Marx pg.37) It is, therefore, not the satisfaction of a need but a mere means to satisfy needs outside itself.…

    • 2198 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Moore

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx perceives society made up as two classes, the powerful and exploitive higher class known as the bourgeoisie and the industrial wage earners that must earn their living by selling their labor known as the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is known as the private property owners and the proletariat works for the bourgeoisie. There is an inequality between these two classes because the bourgeoisie takes advantage of the proletariat by having them work in order to live. Marx believes that what make us human are our productive and creative abilities and when the proletariat works, they lose individual character because they are working for their lives. This causes the proletariat to be alienated while the bourgeoisie capitalist basically sits back and uses the proletariat’s work to its full advantage.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To support this claim, Marx states “Not only are the slaves of the Bourgeoisie class, and of the bourgeois state, they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the over-looker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself.”…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Group Members: Leslie-Ann Bolden, Michela Bowman, Sarah Kaufman, Danielle Jeanne Lindemann Selections from: The Marx-Engels Reader Karl Marx’s broad theoretical and political agenda is based upon a conception of human history that is fundamentally different from those of the social, and especially the philosophical, thinkers who came before him. Most importantly, Marx develops his agenda by drawing on and altering Hegel’s conception of the dialectical nature of the human experience. As Marx describes in his essay, “Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” and again in the “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844,” Hegel did little to base his ideas in the “real” history of man.1 Instead, Hegel’s theory of the nature of man is a “mystical” one. Hegel sees history as a story of man’s alienation from himself. The spirit (Geist, God), is the “true” nature of man, and man must bring the spirit (God) back into himself through the powers of thought (most specifically, philosophy). Drawing on this idea, and also on Feuerbach (see The German Ideology), Marx constructs his conception of history by “standing Hegel on his head.” Unlike Hegel, Marx regards God or spirit as the projection of man’s “true” self. To understand the true self of man, Marx argues, one must understand his “real,” social, material conditions. He states: “It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness” (4). From this idea, Marx proposes to understand the alienated state of man through an understanding of what he terms “historical materialism.” By understanding the material conditions of man through history, Marx argues, man can come to understand his social and political conditions. As he states, “The sum total of these [material] relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Few philosophers viscerally strike a chord with their readers, regardless of the subject in question. Yet there is something within Marx's essay, Alienated Labor, that is able to communicate directly to working people laboring even over one-hundred and fifty years subsequent to its publication. There is good reason for this: Marx elucidated a theory of labor in which workers become subservient to the objects they produce, a theory where people are not exalted by their labor, but devalued by it. Marx's concept of alienated labor describes the internal conflict and disparity of workers, be they from the 19th or 21st century, when their existence is contingent upon fulfilling the desires and wants of another and neglecting their own.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (To be fair, Schwartz doesn’t mention that many work harder for more money too.) So there is a cost to what Karl Marx called alienated labor. “Too often, instead of being able to take pride in what they do, and derive satisfaction from doing it well, workers have little to show for their efforts aside from their pay.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays